Ok, but that presumes Nico would have been better. His 2024 season doesn't reflect that, even though he looked ready to play in the Iowa game, but then so did Joe in the Clemson game. Actually Nico fares slightly worse statistically - they're nearly identical - and didn't improve meaningfully over the season. Nico hasn't proven he'll ever be good enough.In that particular instance against UTSA, he shouldn’t have played after he got hurt. We were up big. Then he stinks up the joint and let them get back into it.
However, I will say that we saw in September that Joe was not the answer, and every game he played after that was a wasted of reps for Nico. I absolutely believe Nico should have played, not because he was great, but because Joe wasn’t good enough and never would be.
Anyway, back to the point; it's unsubstantiated meme-weaving to assert Heupel wouldn't have sat Joe during 2022 if not for Milton's injury. Or that there's a larger, blind loyalty-to-the-starter problem there.
Yet.