Anti-shunshinepumper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
- Messages
- 4,102
- Likes
- 4,159
Upon seeing Nico now, I don’t think he would have been much, if any, better than Joe in 2023, but it’s possible that he would have been better in 2024 with a year of SEC play under his belt.Ok, but that presumes Nico would have been better. His 2024 season doesn't reflect that, even though he looked ready to play in the Iowa game, but then so did Joe in the Clemson game. Actually Nico fares slightly worse statistically - they're nearly identical - and didn't improve meaningfully over the season. Nico hasn't proven he'll ever be good enough.
Anyway, back to the point; it's unsubstantiated meme-weaving to assert Heupel wouldn't have sat Joe during 2022 if not for Milton's injury. Or that there's a larger, blind loyalty-to-the-starter problem there.
Yet.
Yes if you want to win 6 games , maybe 7.When the season starts, Merklinger will have been in the system for 18+ months. If he's not ready to play, or doesn't have a grasp on the offense, he was vastly overrated out of high school and he never will get it no matter how long he's here.
I've seen nothing as yet to make me believe that's the case. Basing anything, good or ill, off a spring game, is silly.
I don't believe we'd have told him to kick rocks if we didn't feel we had a capable QB between him and GMAC.
We are the king of starting true freshman. Manning, Clausen, Ainge, and Bray all did it.
Jalen Hurts did it, Matthew Stafford, Fromm did it a few years ago and finished something like 5th in the nation in QBR and took Georgia to the championship game.
18 months is plenty of time for Merklinger to be the man.
It is possible, and who is in better position to make that decision than coaches? You can make a ride or die either way; the guy who doesn't let the program gains slip too far, or the guy who may put you at .500 this year but MAY ball-out next year.Upon seeing Nico now, I don’t think he would have been much, if any, better than Joe in 2023, but it’s possible that he would have been better in 2024 with a year of SEC play under his belt.
And do you want to go into this season with, at best, the 10th best QB in the league?Opinions on VN are that Nico was "mid" yet Merk last year and through Spring practices couldn't separate himself and surpass Nico.
G-Mac in Spring practice seemed no better than Merk and has zero snaps in a college game as of yet.
There's a whole contingent saying Nico was the 9th best QB in the SEC last year yet neither Merk nor G-Mac could blow him away in practice.
Ask yourself, why couldn't Merk, at least, distinguish himself above Nico if Nico is the 9th best QB in the SEC?
I've been on the side of recruiting a one year starter since Nico left.And do you want to go into this season with, at best, the 10th best QB in the league?
Or would you try to find someone better?
Eason a freshman at UGA almost had us beat until the Dobbsnail Boot play.When the season starts, Merklinger will have been in the system for 18+ months. If he's not ready to play, or doesn't have a grasp on the offense, he was vastly overrated out of high school and he never will get it no matter how long he's here.
I've seen nothing as yet to make me believe that's the case. Basing anything, good or ill, off a spring game, is silly.
I don't believe we'd have told him to kick rocks if we didn't feel we had a capable QB between him and GMAC.
We are the king of starting true freshman. Manning, Clausen, Ainge, and Bray all did it.
Jalen Hurts did it, Matthew Stafford, Fromm did it a few years ago and finished something like 5th in the nation in QBR and took Georgia to the championship game.
18 months is plenty of time for Merklinger to be the man.
Milton didn’t win us any games in 2023, you could maybe say Kentucky would have been a loss with Nico. Which, obviously that would have been a bad loss, but it wouldn’t have necessarily been a loss. I only cite it because it’s the only example of Milton playing well in a close win in 2024 or even playing well in a game our defense didn’t dominate. Seeing how Nico played against Iowa, I believe he was at least passable enough to beat Kentucky that year. Gaston Moore would have gone 7-5 that year, and so would Nico at a minimum. So at most, you would have lost one win by going to Nico in 2023, more likely you have the same record.It is possible, and who is in better position to make that decision than coaches? You can make a ride or die either way; the guy who doesn't let the program gains slip too far, or the guy who may put you at .500 this year but MAY ball-out next year.
It's easy when all we see are on the field results but have not the faintest idea of that guy's progression or ability prior. It's easy to say "See! See! - we should have been playing X all along!" when the damn light for X may have just switched on two weeks ago.
I don't know what to tell you except to repeat "It is possible"; the rest is speculation. Joe had a worse defense yielding less time of possession, more opponent points, and a worse offensive line giving up 12 more sacks. Even having better pass blocking, higher TOP, and a better running game wasn't enough for Nico to statistically separate himself. It's as possible to speculate Nico comes out of 2023 worse off, and UT having to deal with this last year instead of now.Milton didn’t win us any games in 2023, you could maybe say Kentucky would have been a loss with Nico. Which, obviously that would have been a bad loss, but it wouldn’t have necessarily been a loss. I only cite it because it’s the only example of Milton playing well in a close win in 2024 or even playing well in a game our defense didn’t dominate. Seeing how Nico played against Iowa, I believe he was at least passable enough to beat Kentucky that year. Gaston Moore would have gone 7-5 that year, and so would Nico at a minimum. So at most, you would have lost one win by going to Nico in 2023, more likely you have the same record.
Now if he goes into that Arkansas game in 2024 with 8 SEC starts and 10 starts against P4 competition instead of 1 and 3 respectively, would that have made a difference? I think it could have. He would have played at Alabama, at Kentucky in a close game, and at OU when he went to Arkansas. Might have given him enough experience to stay composed enough at Arkansas to pull out a win, and then we would have gone to Atlanta. Texas lost to Gunnar Stockton throwing less than 100 yards, so we might have had a chance there, but either way, going to Atlanta would be a real accomplishment on par or better than going to the playoff and losing in round 1.
Playing Nico might have lost the Kentucky game in 2023, but it might have won the SEC Championship in 2024. I believe Nico isn’t good, but sticking it out with Joe was the wrong decision, because Nico is basically a skinny, younger Joe Milton.