2024 Presidential Race

#15,127
#15,127
BowlBrother85 said:
As I have already stated dozens of times now ....

The involvement of Project Veritas gives plausibility to the belief that the diary was tampered with, They have a history of tampering with evidence, lying about evidence and bribing witnesses to lie for them. They are not above forgery. The couple who found the diary was obviously trying to make as much money from it as possible, and therefore, they also had motive to tamper with the diary.

Why do you keep asking the same questions over and over?

Whether you agree with me or not, my reasoning should be easy to understand. I believe that the involvement of Project Veritas in this matter taints the authenticity of the evidence. Maybe Ashley Biden did write those entries? .... However, there is room for reasonable suspicion based on the lack of integrity of the people who were in possession of the diary in between the time Ashley Biden last had it, and when it was handed over to the FBI.

We have covered all of this in the past. It is my own stupid fault for letting you drag me into this yet again. I should be able to ignore this.
Click to expand...

C’mon bro…this topic gets you wound up because you know it’s probably true. She’s therapy writing and mentions showers with her dad as a reason she feels like she was molested. It’s not proof of anything but it’s an alarming revelation.

Your subconscious can’t help but connect this with the inappropriate groping and sniffing on young children. We’ve all seen the videos.

These are coping mechanisms. The diary was a forgery. I don’t have to believe they might be true if I can smear the source. You need to do some journaling of your own 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, hog88 and whodeycin85
#15,129
#15,129
DC_Vol said:
C’mon bro…this topic gets you wound up because you know it’s probably true. She’s therapy writing and mentions showers with her dad as a reason she feels like she was molested. It’s not proof of anything but it’s an alarming revelation.

Your subconscious can’t help but connect this with the inappropriate groping and sniffing on young children. We’ve all seen the videos.

These are coping mechanisms. The diary was a forgery. I don’t have to believe they might be true if I can smear the source. You need to do some journaling of your own 😉
Click to expand...
My suspicions are reasonable, based on the lack of integrity of the people who found it and sold it .... and the people who bought it. If you can't understand that? I don't care anymore.
 
#15,136
#15,136
BowlBrother85 said:
That doesn't make that couple or Project Veritas any more credible. They both had significant motives to tamper with the diary, if it didn't include any material which was damaging to Joe Biden's reputation. You can't get around their involvement. It absolutely does taint the authenticity of the evidence.
Click to expand...
You continue to leave out the very inconvenient truth of what transpired next.

The DOJ/FBI had the diary AFTER the goon squad was in possession of it.

They had it for weeks.
They processed it into evidence.
They examined it for authenticity.

Are you saying they knew it was forged, and kept that a secret?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
#15,137
#15,137
luthervol said:
It doesn't matter if they were or not because they say pretty much nothing.
Try not to lose sight of that important point.
Click to expand...
There is an actual credible argument as to what her journal entries convey.

Not sure why you continue to dabble in the conspiracy theory that 3rd party master forgers were contracted to insert fake pages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#15,138
#15,138
85SugarVol said:
You continue to leave out the very inconvenient truth of what transpired next.

The DOJ/FBI had the diary AFTER the goon squad was in possession of it.

They had it for weeks.
They processed it into evidence.
They examined it for authenticity.

Are you saying they knew it was forged, and kept that a secret?
Click to expand...
We do not know that they analyzed every passage of the diary for authenticity. You are surmising that they did. They investigated it in order to confirm that it was Ashley Biden's property.

It is possible that the contents were analyzed for authenticity .... We don't know. The FBI has never addressed the contents of the diary .... only its ownership.
 
#15,139
#15,139
BowlBrother85 said:
We do not know that they analyzed every passage of the diary for authenticity. You are surmising that they did. They investigated it in order to confirm that it was Ashley Biden's property.

It is possible that the contents were analyzed for authenticity .... We don't know. The FBI has never addressed the contents of the diary .... only its ownership.
Click to expand...
I didn’t say “the contents” of the diary.

They examined the physical diary (not the content of the passages) and declared that it was authentic. That it was indeed Ashley Biden’s diary.

At no point, via official release, or leak, did they intimate in any way that the diary had been tampered with.

None. Zilch. Nada.
 
#15,140
#15,140
85SugarVol said:
They examined the physical diary (not the content of the passages) and declared that it was authentic. That it was indeed Ashley Biden’s diary.
Click to expand...
She said that it was hers from the start. That was never at issue.

85SugarVol said:
At no point, via official release, or leak, did they intimate in any way that the diary had been tampered with.
Click to expand...
True .... but if the contents were never scrutinized, then why would they?

.... and I really am done this time. My aggravation with this stems from how much this has already been discussed in the past. Sorry for erupting earlier, but I'm tired of this topic. Don't you realize that everything being said over this .... has been said by all of us many times before? Was it really necessary to rehash this .... again?????
 
#15,143
#15,143
BowlBrother85 said:
She said that it was hers from the start. That was never at issue.


True .... but if the contents were never scrutinized, then why would they?

.... and I really am done this time. My aggravation with this stems from how much this has already been discussed in the past. Sorry for erupting earlier, but I'm tired of this topic. Don't you realize that everything being said over this .... has been said by all of us many times before? Was it really necessary to rehash this .... again?????
Click to expand...
They still examined the diary. They processed it into evidence.

They wouldn’t have to analyze the contents to identify physical inconsistencies.

Paper
Ink
Glue
Color
Handwriting
Finger prints

- Maybe the pre-imminent crime lab in the world missed them, duped by the 2 Goons.
OR
- Maybe the FBI knew there were physical inconsistencies and decided not to clear their boss.

If the pages are forged - One of those ^ is true.
 
#15,146
#15,146
85SugarVol said:
They still examined the diary. They processed it into evidence.

They wouldn’t have to analyze the contents to identify physical inconsistencies.

Paper
Ink
Glue
Color
Handwriting
Finger prints

- Maybe the pre-imminent crime lab in the world missed them, duped by the 2 Goons.
OR
- Maybe the FBI knew there were physical inconsistencies and decided not to clear their boss.

If the pages are forged - One of those ^ is true.
Click to expand...
Maybe they didn't actually scrutinize the diary for inconsistencies? Ashley Biden had already acknowledged that it was hers. We don't know what the FBI did or didn't do ..... They haven't addressed it. You are having to surmise a lot from very little information, confirmed by the FBI.

There is no getting around your bias either. You don't want to believe that Project Veritas tampered with the diary, even though they have an established history of doing such things.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top