85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 34,259
- Likes
- 68,073
Youāre better than I am. I would have thrown out the supposedly daycare. Edit Edit Jen. Heās alright for a dawg fan visitorYou have to realize how hilarious this take is coming from a Georgia fan. I'm sure you believe those Kirby recruiting classes were all on the up and up, which makes it even funnier, IMO. I mean, sure, Amarius Mims turned down money from multiple schools to go to Georgia. Same with Darnell Washington. You're an okay dude for a pup fan, but you have to know Georgia was shelling out money before shelling out money was allowed. Yet the eye of the NCAA never fell upon you.
![]()
I have no idea, but if so, then they'll lose here too.But isnāt it the same with Tennessee? They didnāt have enough rules to umbrella collectives as boosters with Nico, right?
I know. I was doing the comparing.I have no idea, but if so, then they'll lose here too.
Sometimes I have to remember the NCAA has failed to be able to punish many many times. Their bylaws only cover so much...
I'm just more familiar with the UNC case because it's both been dealt with and has been fleshed out in great detail over years and years.
Fwiw was in no way comparing the cases. Just speaking to the UNC case with the other poster.
You have to realize how hilarious this take is coming from a Georgia fan. I'm sure you believe those Kirby recruiting classes were all on the up and up, which makes it even funnier, IMO. I mean, sure, Amarius Mims turned down money from multiple schools to go to Georgia. Same with Darnell Washington. You're an okay dude for a pup fan, but you have to know Georgia was shelling out money before shelling out money was allowed. Yet the eye of the NCAA never fell upon you.
![]()
Lol, mental gymnastics. If you donāt think Georgia cheats on the recruiting trail than you are either ignorant or lying to yourself. Either way, lol.You seem to have read more into my post than was there. Ulysses suggested that NIL resources make Ohio State better positioned than Tennessee acquire athletes. I wondered if that would necessarily guarantee more success. I don't have the answer, just noted that this sort of thing had been debated before in a military context. Maybe having the most money is paramount in the NIL era, but I'm not sure because football is the ultimate team sport and culture is important.
As for Mims or Washington, I haven't seen any evidence that they were paid to sign with UGA, so what was the NCAA's reason to investigate? It's possible, but you could say that for any college athlete. If you're saying that Pruitt offered them money and thus UGA must have done the same, I don't believe that's the kind of logic that launches investigations. Pruitt reportedly handed out $60,000 total to multiple athletes, much less per individual player presumably. Sums like that could be, and almost certainly have been, outweighed by non-financial considerations in a player's recruitment.
Has Georgia been illegally "shelling out money" in amounts that give them a recruiting advantage over everyone else? When there's money or power at stake, I never rule out the possibility of cheating. But I'd need to see something more than "they're recruiting very well so they must have some illicit advantage". In the recent past UGA's underperformance ("no championship since 1981"), despite some obvious geographic recruiting advantages, was used as an indictment of the program and of Mark Richt. Now it's overperformance, I guess.