The Atlanta Braves

Also hot take but Ronald needs to give up leading off.
Drop him to 3, move Ozzie to 2 and put Matt at 4.
In the long run it should produce more RB I opportunities.
 
lol, congrats? If you truly think they are better, and our guys did anything other than fall flat out their faces, then agree to disagree and have a good day bro. Coming into the series, they only edge they had was bullpen. You predicted we couldn’t hit Ranger Suarez twice? Lol

Or that this dude had a 4.46 ERA and would do this

 
  • Like
Reactions: AV_12
Also hot take but Ronald needs to give up leading off.
Drop him to 3, move Ozzie to 2 and put Matt at 4.
In the long run it should produce more RB I opportunities.

No. Ronnie needs to be leadoff. Lineup construction is fine. Just need a better #2 hitter. Ozzie is great, much more suited for 5/6
 
He is a mediocre SS and an above average 8-hole. Not much better we can do in the current situation we are in. Dans followed his wife. It is what it is.
And they got him super cheap. If he’s your 8th or 9th best everyday guy you’re in fantastic shape
 
It's really not.
I still like the game 1 construction more than anything we ran out all year.

No one had an issue with the lineup. Until we went cold for four games. Ozzie in the 2 hole against righties is my only complaint. Everything else is good.
 
We have Austin, Olson, Ozuna, Murphy, Ozzie. All sluggers that can hit behind Ronnie and drive him in. Taking your best OBP guy with his speed and removing him from that with all the power guys behind him for ā€œRBI opportunitiesā€ is silly baseball. Stack your best dudes and go from there.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 05_never_again
Also hot take but Ronald needs to give up leading off.
Drop him to 3, move Ozzie to 2 and put Matt at 4.
In the long run it should produce more RB I opportunities.
Most teams bat their best player second. We bat our 5th (?) best second.

Ronald likes to bat first and we don’t have a leadoff hitter so it is what it is. We didn’t lose because lineup construction (although it’s pretty peculiar to submit a G1 lineup we’ve literally never used despite having the last 40 games to do whatever we wanted with), we lost because the other side has better players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zjcvols
Most teams bat their best player second. We bat our 5th (?) best second.

Ronald likes to bat first and we don’t have a leadoff hitter so it is what it is. We didn’t lose because lineup construction (although it’s pretty peculiar to submit a G1 lineup we’ve literally never used despite having the last 40 games to do whatever we wanted with), we lost because the other side has better players.

That game 1 no show was brutal. Only gave up 3 runs, faced Ranger Suarez and put up a goose egg. If they do anything it’s 2-2 with Max back at our place. Just inexcusable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coach_Z
Advertisement



Back
Top