President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

I think you’ve said but I don’t remember. Who got your vote in the primary last time?
Sanders or Buttigieg; I don't remember, but Biden had already locked up the dem nomination and all the other candidates on the ballot had officially withdrawn. Biden still only received 88% of the vote. I think Sanders got 9%.
 
Sanders or Buttigieg; I don't remember, but Biden had already locked up the dem nomination and all the other candidates on the ballot had officially withdrawn. Biden still only received 88% of the vote. I think Sanders got 9%.

Both had dropped out before the GA primary was held. Pete dropped out on March 1st Bernie dropped out April 8th and the GA primary was June 9th.
 
That's what I said.
Bernie still got 9.3% and Pete got 0.6%.

Then why did you vote for a candidate that had withdrawn? You have numerous posts about wasting a vote by voting for someone who has no chance of winning, my guess is that you dutifully pulled the lever for old Joe and just don't want to admit it.
 
Then why did you vote for a candidate that had withdrawn? You have numerous posts about wasting a vote by voting for someone who has no chance of winning, my guess is that you dutifully pulled the lever for old Joe and just don't want to admit it.
I'm going to have to side with luther on this one. He happily brags about doing all kinds of stupid ****. Why would this be any different?
 
Then why did you vote for a candidate that had withdrawn? You have numerous posts about wasting a vote by voting for someone who has no chance of winning, my guess is that you dutifully pulled the lever for old Joe and just don't want to admit it.
Well your guess, as is the norm, is completely wrong.
You still don't understand the throw away vote and when it makes sense to use it. Everybody who took the time and made the effort (some of those votes were absentee cast before the candidates had withdrawn) to vote for a candidate who had already withdrawn was clearly saying, "I do not support Biden as the democratic candidate". What they were NOT doing was making it easier for a candidate they liked even less to win. (That's key).

When it makes no sense to "throw away" a vote is when there are only two viable candidates and you dislike one more than the other.

But, I'm all for right leaners voting 3rd party....... I would actually vote 3rd party under certain circumstances.
 
Sure most of us have relied on financial loans of one type or another when we were younger without experience to expect better wages/salary, when we needed things necessary to begin life on our own, and when life itself (perhaps marriage and children) demanded more of our income. However, with success leading to better incomes and accumulation of needs ... maturity, most of us become more financially stable and independent. How long do you think a country can go on acting like a high maintenance adolescent with no will to learn any semblance of financial maturity, restraint, or management?

Heh. 6% of our budget goes to pay debt.

Was 15% under Reagan and Bush I.

This. Is. Political. Shenanigans.
 
The House can impeach Biden but the Senate will not. The DOJ will do nothing other than what Biden tells them to do (crooks will not investigate themselves) so there is very little Reps can do. But at least facts are getting out that Biden is a crook while the Dems had no facts of any wrong doing in the impeachments of Trump
Doesn’t change the fact that the House should do what’s right and at least send it over to the Senate. Knowledge that they don’t have the votes to remove from office sure didn’t stop the Democrats from impeaching twice on absolutely spurious charges
 
Tucker Carlson, Tony Bobulinski, the FBI, and the DOJ have known this for over 2 years.

It was obvious from Hunter Biden’s texts and emails that the Biden’s were running an influence peddling scheme and were raking in a lot of cash, including from regimes we consider to be hostile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbwhhs
EXCLUSIVE: The Harrowing Videos that lay bare the True Scale of Title 42: Drone Footage Captures a sea of tents dotted along the Rio Grande and CHILDREN being rescued from while swimming from Mexico to the US

A sprawling tent encampment stretches out of sight along the Mexican bank of the Rio Grande, captured in aerial footage.

As the drone follows the path of tents along the river, two figures splash into the water, setting off for the far bank with rapid strokes.

Their target comes into view: Three children, using rubber rings and empty Coke bottles for flotation, are caught up in weeds, their heads barely above water.

The dramatic drone footage, obtained exclusively by DailyMail.com, uncovers the true scale of the immigration crisis and human desperation on display along the southern border as Title 42 comes to an end.

It shows hundreds of people camped out beneath thin blue plastic sheets with Brownsville, Texas, in their sights.

70835149-12068881-A_sprawling_tent_encampment_stretches_out_of_sight_along_the_Mex-a-4_1683753266355.jpg


70834273-12068881-As_the_drone_follows_the_path_of_tents_along_the_river_two_figur-a-8_1683753356341.jpg


70834277-12068881-The_footage_captures_the_dramatic_moment_when_two_adults_plunge_-a-21_1683753590179.jpg


70834275-12068881-image-a-24_1683753616737.jpg


70833387-12068881-image-a-10_1683753368874.jpg


70837755-12068881-image-a-1_1683753027721.jpg

Officials on both sides are bracing for an influx over the border to begin exactly at 11.59pm eastern time on May 11 when Title 42 is mothballed.

The videos that lay bare the scale of Title 42 | Daily Mail Online
 
Advertisement

Back
Top