Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#3,776
#3,776
Here is the ironic thing, liberals were already boycotting fox advertisers. Now conservatives are gearing up to do the same thing.
Really stupid companies are the ones that p*ss off half of their potential customers. But I don’t think I have ever seen a business so colossally foolish as to basically give the finger to BOTH HALVES of their potential audience.
What market segment exactly is fox going to rely on now for viewership?
FCB28BC4-C24F-4DF2-BF94-0D5F01016BF4.gif
I already did a search of fox advertisers to know who to boycott. You know who already did the hard work and compiled a list for me? the liberals who were trying to get Tucker cancelled for the past three years. Thanks Libs!!!!! 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,779
#3,779
lawgator1 said:
I have a real fear that Jesse Waters is going to take that spot, either that time or become the heir apparent. Carlson is a smug SOB but Waters is off the charts. Really seems like the glib factor with him caps his upside potential.
Click to expand...

That would be outstanding.

Or Greg Gutfeld.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
#3,784
#3,784
TN Ribs said:
I hope @BreatheUT and many others on this forum have some family and friends checking in on them today. The creepy fanboy obsession with Tucker was cult-like and pathetic. The good news for them is they all got smarter today - it's addition by subtraction not having to watch Tucker since he has been knowingly lying to them for years. They also get an hour back of their day and I'm here to help, I recommend the Stanley Cup Playoffs which has the best postseason in all of sports.
Click to expand...

You guys have to get find any happiness you can, everyone knows nobody watches cnn or msnbc, except for a few sheep here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Franklin Pierce
#3,785
#3,785
BowlBrother85 said:
In general, I don't think Fox News tries to convert independents to the Republican side. It's affirmative political programming. Their goal is to galvanize already existing Republican Party support, not create it.
Click to expand...

Do you think of this silliness on your own, or do you ask Ai-chat
 
#3,788
#3,788
hUTch2002 said:
Ah, now your views make sense. Your “news” source sucks.
Click to expand...
Rachel Maddow supports her opinions and constructs better arguments than anyone else on cable news. Her monologues will often begin with a historical reference comparable to a modern event which she builds her argument around. It's a very effective way to make a point. She is an intellectual. Fox News only employs emotionally charged Republican Party sycophants.
 
#3,790
#3,790
BowlBrother85 said:
Rachel Maddow supports her opinions and constructs better arguments than anyone else on cable news. Her monologues will often begin with a historical reference comparable to a modern event which she builds her argument around. It's a very effective way to make a point. She is an intellectual. Fox News only employs emotionally charged Republican Party sycophants.
Click to expand...
Is the vaunted „intellectual“ still trying to convince us of Russian Collusion in 2016? 🤪
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, InVOLuntary, TennEddie and 2 others
#3,791
#3,791
BowlBrother85 said:
Rachel Maddow supports her opinions and constructs better arguments than anyone else on cable news. Her monologues will often begin with a historical reference comparable to a modern event which she builds her argument around. It's a very effective way to make a point. She is an intellectual. Fox News only employs emotionally charged Republican Party sycophants.
Click to expand...

She is simply a far left arm-waving homosexual, who takes forever to make a point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary, TennEddie and 2 others
#3,797
#3,797
BowlBrother85 said:
Rachel Maddow supports her opinions and constructs better arguments than anyone else on cable news. Her monologues will often begin with a historical reference comparable to a modern event which she builds her argument around. It's a very effective way to make a point. She is an intellectual. Fox News only employs emotionally charged Republican Party sycophants.
Click to expand...
In other words, you lap up every word simply because you agree with her. We all know.

Edit: Do you even realize she’s just there for entertainment purposes just like Tucker was?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary and EasternVol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top