Fox being sued for allegedly broadcasting ‘lies’ about Dominion

#7
#7
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FallCreekVols, Tnslim1, InVOLuntary and 2 others
#10
#10
If you owned a company which manufactured a product, and then the President and his proxies went on TV saying you were owned by Venezuela or China (when it isn't) or some other foreign country and that your product was part of a conspiracy (that didn't exist).

And on top of that you and your lawyers kept telling them there was no truth to what they were saying. And then judges told them there was no truth to it.

And then they kept on repeating the lies to the point you started getting threats.

You'd sue too. And you'd be right to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VFFL@THE BEACH and ClearwaterVol
#11
#11
lawgator1 said:
If you owned a company which manufactured a product, and then the President and his proxies went on TV saying you were owned by Venezuela or China (when it isn't) or some other foreign country and that your product was part of a conspiracy (that didn't exist).

And on top of that you and your lawyers kept telling them there was no truth to what they were saying. And then judges told them there was no truth to it.

And then they kept on repeating the lies to the point you started getting threats.

You'd sue too. And you'd be right to do it.
Click to expand...
Are you one of 400k viewers of CNN?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, AM64, dovervolz and 2 others
#14
#14
lawgator1 said:
If you owned a company which manufactured a product, and then the President and his proxies went on TV saying you were owned by Venezuela or China (when it isn't) or some other foreign country and that your product was part of a conspiracy (that didn't exist).

And on top of that you and your lawyers kept telling them there was no truth to what they were saying. And then judges told them there was no truth to it.

And then they kept on repeating the lies to the point you started getting threats.

You'd sue too. And you'd be right to do it.
Click to expand...
So you think Trump has a defamation suit against CNN, MSNBC, and any other media outlet that cover RussiaGate and the Pee tapes...which were flat out known lies at the time correct? Remember be consistent
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tnslim1, InVOLuntary, 82_VOL_83 and 2 others
#15
#15
whodeycin85 said:
So you think Trump has a defamation suit against CNN, MSNBC, and any other media outlet that cover RussiaGate and the Pee tapes...which were flat out known lies at the time correct? Remember be consistent
Click to expand...


Truth is a defense. And if he sued over any of it he'd have to sit for a deposition, under oath. Trump will NEVER do that because he'd perjure himself and he knows it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VFFL@THE BEACH and VOLnMiami
#17
#17
whodeycin85 said:
So you think Trump has a defamation suit against CNN, MSNBC, and any other media outlet that cover RussiaGate and the Pee tapes...which were flat out known lies at the time correct? Remember be consistent
Click to expand...

Of course not defamation is now a one way streak, as most laws now. Especially when you have a pro-communist regime
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and davethevol
#20
#20
lawgator1 said:
Truth is a defense. And if he sued over any of it he'd have to sit for a deposition, under oath. Trump will NEVER do that because he'd perjure himself and he knows it.
Click to expand...
Not really...I believe that fact it's came out with no supporting evidence would be enough to prove defamation...if I tell a lie about someone and it's proven to be a lie....it not up to them to provided further proof that it's a lie
 
#21
#21
whodeycin85 said:
Not really...I believe that fact it's came out with no supporting evidence would be enough to prove defamation...if I tell a lie about someone and it's proven to be a lie....it not up to them to provided further proof that it's a lie
Click to expand...


Yes, it is. And Trump would have to sit for a deposition and answer everything. Under oath. Subject to prosecution if he lies. He ain't doing it. No chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VFFL@THE BEACH and VOLnMiami
#23
#23
lawgator1 said:
Yes, it is. And Trump would have to sit for a deposition and answer everything. Under oath. Subject to prosecution if he lies. He ain't doing it. No chance.
Click to expand...
I'll admit I'm not up to date on laws regarding such...but seems that your basically saying the victim has to prove they are a victim again even tho the proof has already been established.....I'm pretty sure a person being robbed with video evidence of such theft doesn't have to prove it again..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
#24
#24
whodeycin85 said:
I'll admit I'm not up to date on laws regarding such...but seems that your basically saying the victim has to prove they are a victim again even tho the proof has already been established.....I'm pretty sure a person being robbed with video evidence of such theft doesn't have to prove it again..
Click to expand...


Yes, he'll have to take the stand and deny it. He has to prove it false in court. Others coming in and saying they already did that out of court is hearsay. Trump's like would be an open book in such a suit. For one thing, the issue arises as to whether any claim of damages was caused by this ... or something else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VFFL@THE BEACH and VOLnMiami
#25
#25
lawgator1 said:
Yes, he'll have to take the stand and deny it. He has to prove it false in court. Others coming in and saying they already did that out of court is hearsay. Trump's like would be an open book in such a suit. For one thing, the issue arises as to whether any claim of damages was caused by this ... or something else.
Click to expand...

Still pushing the Trump hate. Where does it come from? Did he do your mother way back when.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tnslim1, StarRaider and 82_VOL_83
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top