There are probably an unlimited number of methods to measure strength of schedule so it’s pretty easy if you don’t like one you can probably find one you do like. Strength of schedule even when measured by computers can be subjective, depending on what data is being measured.
I looked at the standard measurements, offensive rushing yards per attempt, offensive passing rating, total offense in yards per play, and scoring offense. I looked at the same data on the defensive side of the ball.
Georgia’s 5 SEC opponents to date have played a total of 24 SEC games including their game against Georgia. We’ve played 4 SEC opponents to date and collectively they have played 20 SEC games including their game against Tennessee.
Georgia’s 5 SEC opponents have won 6 SEC games on the year out of 24; Tennessee’s 4 SEC opponents have won 11 SEC games on the year out of 20.
The table below shows that our SEC opponents are better against SEC competition in all of the statistical measurements cited than Georgia’s SEC opponents in their SEC clashes. From a scoring perspective, offense and defense combined, Tennessee’s SEC opponents are 15.5 points better in conference than Georgia’s SEC opponents, meaning Tennessee's SEC opponents to date would be expected to beat Georgia's SEC opponents to date by an average of 15.5 points per game.
Note: The averages do not include the Georgia and Tennessee numbers, only their SEC opponents.
Note 2: Even with what is arguably a much stronger strength of schedule Tennessee is #1 in conference against SEC opponents in offensive passing rating, offensive total yards per play, scoring offense, and rushing defense yards per attempt. We really are pretty good, overall #1 in the nation I'm told.
View attachment 510267