A Miami newspaper is stating that they're out of the race, and it looks like its down to Oregon and the hometown Kansas State Wildcats. I'll try to find the link.
<table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="padding: 6px;" valign="top">SI.com reports Bryce Brown still committed to Miami...</td><td 1="" class="" style="padding: 6px;" valign="bottom" align="right" nowrap="nowrap">Reply</td></tr></tbody></table><hr color="#cccccc" noshade="noshade"> Bryce, his father and mentor are all quoted as saying that BB is still committed to miami. So I guess none of them understand the definition of the word. Maybe they are thinking of the word interested. It has been said on here often, but the word committed is meaningless nowadays.
<table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="padding: 6px;" valign="top">
is this deal crazy or what?
</td><td style="padding: 6px;" class="" 1="" valign="bottom" align="right" nowrap="nowrap">
</td></tr></tbody></table>
I think that Butler will lead him to sign with whoever is most likely to continue to use his "services" in the future. Originally, I believe that his partner was set to be Miami, which resulted in NY Times detailing the shenanigans that they did / did not offer another of Butlers potential player a scholarship. Sure, Miami officially came out and said that they had not, in fact, offered a scholarship to this wholly unknown player, it was only after the offer began to drew wider attention and outright suspicion from others that they (finally) chose to do so. This first hiccup in their relationship with Butler was not greatly exacerbated when Browns recruitment was subsequently shopped to other schools (in fact, he had warned them he would do this as part of his plan), but rather, only when it began to look as if they might not actually get him to sign. Simply, Miami was willing to play along (and look somewhat suspicious and foolish in the process) so long as they ended up with Brown. When it became unmistakably clear that they may not get him after all, the game was up. In response, Butler begins anew the search for a partner to replace Miami. To give him time to do so, Bryces announcement is moved to March 16<SUP>th</SUP>, something which they say was decided long ago, but was only announced just a few weeks ago. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comffice
ffice" /><o
></o
>
<o> </o
>
Although verbally committed for months, suddenly, a whole slew of teams begin to emerge or move to the forefront of Bryces radar, including Tennessee. <o></o
>
Oregon, a team who has established somewhat of a pipeline into the Wichita area, becomes an ever prominent name in the mix. In another article, Butler states that he has had phone conversations from other(s) around the country who are looking to do similar training / mentoring arrangements in their area, and asked for his help and advice in doing so. Did anyone else notice the connection that exists between Oregon and its wealthiest / most influential booster, Phil Knight of Nike? Who better than Nike to help Butler grow a network of training facilities and elite football camps all around the country? That's the same "Nike" as you'll likely seen in, "Nike Football Training Camps" for those scoring at home. <o></o
>
<o></o
>
Tennessee, and its new all-star recruiting coaching staff suddenly gets involved, seemingly, out of the blue. Recall Bryces earlier comments, saying he was wanted to sign after NSD in order to know where all of the stud o-linemen would have signed by then. Slice it however you want, and I dont like it any more than you, but Tennessee has one of the most emaciated offensive lines in college football, and NSD did little (if anything) to alleviate those large concerns. Maybe we coach them up, maybe we move some people around, but at the end of the day, it is what it is and it wont be any different come March 16<SUP>th</SUP>, I am sorry to say. Brown later said that Tennessee, "doesnt have the players to get done what theyre trying to do" on their current roster. Imagine walking into that locker room as a freshman with those comments pasted to the side of the big white elephant standing angrily in the middle of the room. Would you want to be that guy? Neither would I. Unless Mrs. Earps possesses some persuasive powers of conversion which would be sufficient to make Billy Graham blush with envy, you can likely forget that being the deciding factor, too. <o></o
>
<o></o
>
That brings us to Kansas State, which is not only a good friend to have in the neighborhood, but his alma mater. Did anyone else find Butlers comments on KSU to be somewhat over-the-top and out of nowhere last week? Has he ever appeared so fawning over any other school or coach than he was KSUs Coach Snyder? Do you think some fans in the local area would be willing to change their perception of Butler if he guides Brown to sign with the local team? You bet they would, and Butler needs all of the friends he can get in Kansas right about now. It should also be noted that KSU only recently fired a coach who discouraged his boosters to support Butlers efforts, and have now re-hired a new one (Coach Snyder) who sounds as if he not only supports Butler, but wants to move to Vermont and get the relationship legalized. I wonder if Butler sees this as an opportunity he should exploit, er, explore? Me, too.<o></o
>
<o> </o
>
Why did USC bail out, and why do I think that LSU would, too? Because not only would they not play along, they wont even act like they would play along. They would like to have Brown, for sure, but they don't need Butler to get him. They'll simply get the next Brown, next year. Or more likely, a player of equal quality is already on their roster right now. If LSU plays ball with Butler, they become immediate players in this, and I believe, will seal the deal. I don't think that they'll feel a need to do so, a la USC, and Brown leaves both unconsidered. <o></o
>
<o></o
>
So, here's an interesting question:<o></o
>
<o></o
>
What do the final four (4) teams that are most likely remaining (Miami, Kansas State, Oregon and Tennessee) all have in common?<o></o
>
<o></o
>
Proximity to home? Same conference? Same offensive styles? New coach? Old coach? No, no, no, no and no. Well, then, what else could it be?<o></o
>
<o></o
>
Each of the four teams are aggressively trying to either enter or restore their place amongst college football's elite - and to do so as quickly as possible. In fact, one could argue that they may each be considered somewhat desperate to do so. So, is it only desperate teams who would want Brown? No, not at all, but it may only be the desperate teams who are also willing to take Butler as part of the deal. <o></o
>
<o></o
>
Ever notice how much they charge for those rain coat things at the stadium? It's extraordinarily higher than anywhere else you could have bought one somewhere else, and yet, they sell out of them each time it rains during a home game. I'll bet that Brian Butler could tell you why, if you don't already know.<o></o
>
<o></o
>
There's no telling what Brown will ultimately do. He doesn't even know. Butler doesn't know. I sure as heck don't know, and neither do you, your contact, "insider", friend, guy you followed down the street, or whomever else someone cites as a reliable source ..including those of you who mention your gut feelings in all of this. While I don't know how each of your "guts may work, I can hardly think of a worse resource for determining my level of optimism as to where an 18-year old kid may sign to play football. Personally, my gut is usually only reliable to tell me when I should eat and go to the bathroom, and little else. Heeding its "feelings" outside of those rudimentary functions is how people wake up one day and find themselves living in a van outside of Tijuana. Simply, your guts are idiots. Please, stop listening to them, or encouraging someone else to do so. If you feel the need to have some wholly unintelligent organ to tell you entirely nonsensical information in order to feel optimistic, just offer to buy the closest liberal a cup of mocha chi soy latte, crack open a fresh pack of clove cigarettes, then sit back and listen to them babble. <o></o
>
<o> </o
>
<o></o
>
It's an 18 year old kid who's supposedly "married" to a UT hostess after one two-day visit (some visit), being mentored by a Don King wannabe - only he's somehow even shadier than the original, which I used to think was impossible so who knows? <o></o
>
<o> </o
>
But, it sure is fun to think and talk about, huh?<o></o
>
I think that Butler will lead him to sign with whoever is most likely to continue to use his "services" in the future. Originally, I believe that his partner was set to be Miami, which resulted in NY Times detailing the shenanigans that they did / did not offer another of Butlers potential player a scholarship. Sure, Miami officially came out and said that they had not, in fact, offered a scholarship to this wholly unknown player, it was only after the offer began to drew wider attention and outright suspicion from others that they (finally) chose to do so. This first hiccup in their relationship with Butler was not greatly exacerbated when Browns recruitment was subsequently shopped to other schools (in fact, he had warned them he would do this as part of his plan), but rather, only when it began to look as if they might not actually get him to sign. Simply, Miami was willing to play along (and look somewhat suspicious and foolish in the process) so long as they ended up with Brown. When it became unmistakably clear that they may not get him after all, the game was up. In response, Butler begins anew the search for a partner to replace Miami. To give him time to do so, Bryces announcement is moved to March 16<SUP>th</SUP>, something which they say was decided long ago, but was only announced just a few weeks ago. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comffice
ffice" /><o
></o
>
<o> </o
>
Although verbally committed for months, suddenly, a whole slew of teams begin to emerge or move to the forefront of Bryces radar, including Tennessee. <o></o
>
Oregon, a team who has established somewhat of a pipeline into the Wichita area, becomes an ever prominent name in the mix. In another article, Butler states that he has had phone conversations from other(s) around the country who are looking to do similar training / mentoring arrangements in their area, and asked for his help and advice in doing so. Did anyone else notice the connection that exists between Oregon and its wealthiest / most influential booster, Phil Knight of Nike? Who better than Nike to help Butler grow a network of training facilities and elite football camps all around the country? That's the same "Nike" as you'll likely seen in, "Nike Football Training Camps" for those scoring at home. <o></o
>
<o></o
>
Tennessee, and its new all-star recruiting coaching staff suddenly gets involved, seemingly, out of the blue. Recall Bryces earlier comments, saying he was wanted to sign after NSD in order to know where all of the stud o-linemen would have signed by then. Slice it however you want, and I dont like it any more than you, but Tennessee has one of the most emaciated offensive lines in college football, and NSD did little (if anything) to alleviate those large concerns. Maybe we coach them up, maybe we move some people around, but at the end of the day, it is what it is and it wont be any different come March 16<SUP>th</SUP>, I am sorry to say. Brown later said that Tennessee, "doesnt have the players to get done what theyre trying to do" on their current roster. Imagine walking into that locker room as a freshman with those comments pasted to the side of the big white elephant standing angrily in the middle of the room. Would you want to be that guy? Neither would I. Unless Mrs. Earps possesses some persuasive powers of conversion which would be sufficient to make Billy Graham blush with envy, you can likely forget that being the deciding factor, too. <o></o
>
<o></o
>
That brings us to Kansas State, which is not only a good friend to have in the neighborhood, but his alma mater. Did anyone else find Butlers comments on KSU to be somewhat over-the-top and out of nowhere last week? Has he ever appeared so fawning over any other school or coach than he was KSUs Coach Snyder? Do you think some fans in the local area would be willing to change their perception of Butler if he guides Brown to sign with the local team? You bet they would, and Butler needs all of the friends he can get in Kansas right about now. It should also be noted that KSU only recently fired a coach who discouraged his boosters to support Butlers efforts, and have now re-hired a new one (Coach Snyder) who sounds as if he not only supports Butler, but wants to move to Vermont and get the relationship legalized. I wonder if Butler sees this as an opportunity he should exploit, er, explore? Me, too.<o></o
>
<o> </o
>
Why did USC bail out, and why do I think that LSU would, too? Because not only would they not play along, they wont even act like they would play along. They would like to have Brown, for sure, but they don't need Butler to get him. They'll simply get the next Brown, next year. Or more likely, a player of equal quality is already on their roster right now. If LSU plays ball with Butler, they become immediate players in this, and I believe, will seal the deal. I don't think that they'll feel a need to do so, a la USC, and Brown leaves both unconsidered. <o></o
>
<o></o
>
So, here's an interesting question:<o></o
>
<o></o
>
What do the final four (4) teams that are most likely remaining (Miami, Kansas State, Oregon and Tennessee) all have in common?<o></o
>
<o></o
>
Proximity to home? Same conference? Same offensive styles? New coach? Old coach? No, no, no, no and no. Well, then, what else could it be?<o></o
>
<o></o
>
Each of the four teams are aggressively trying to either enter or restore their place amongst college football's elite - and to do so as quickly as possible. In fact, one could argue that they may each be considered somewhat desperate to do so. So, is it only desperate teams who would want Brown? No, not at all, but it may only be the desperate teams who are also willing to take Butler as part of the deal. <o></o
>
<o></o
>
Ever notice how much they charge for those rain coat things at the stadium? It's extraordinarily higher than anywhere else you could have bought one somewhere else, and yet, they sell out of them each time it rains during a home game. I'll bet that Brian Butler could tell you why, if you don't already know.<o></o
>
<o></o
>
There's no telling what Brown will ultimately do. He doesn't even know. Butler doesn't know. I sure as heck don't know, and neither do you, your contact, "insider", friend, guy you followed down the street, or whomever else someone cites as a reliable source ..including those of you who mention your gut feelings in all of this. While I don't know how each of your "guts may work, I can hardly think of a worse resource for determining my level of optimism as to where an 18-year old kid may sign to play football. Personally, my gut is usually only reliable to tell me when I should eat and go to the bathroom, and little else. Heeding its "feelings" outside of those rudimentary functions is how people wake up one day and find themselves living in a van outside of Tijuana. Simply, your guts are idiots. Please, stop listening to them, or encouraging someone else to do so. If you feel the need to have some wholly unintelligent organ to tell you entirely nonsensical information in order to feel optimistic, just offer to buy the closest liberal a cup of mocha chi soy latte, crack open a fresh pack of clove cigarettes, then sit back and listen to them babble. <o></o
>
<o> </o
>
<o></o
>
It's an 18 year old kid who's supposedly "married" to a UT hostess after one two-day visit (some visit), being mentored by a Don King wannabe - only he's somehow even shadier than the original, which I used to think was impossible so who knows? <o></o
>
<o> </o
>
But, it sure is fun to think and talk about, huh?<o></o
>
