MarcoVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2019
- Messages
- 18,896
- Likes
- 89,477
No, it wasn't "horrendous," it was rigged.
The safety alone is proof the game was rigged and more than the margin of victory.
But there is also the Bama PI that cost TX a TD early. More than margin victory.
The scramble they are bragging on that set up Bama's "winning" FG was a flagrant two hand hold by Bama's right OT. That turned a -20 yd and loss of down play into a +20 yd play for the first down and the FG. That's a 40 yd swing and the play that "won" the game.
"Horrendous" and "incompetent" are the cover stories. The other cover story here is that they actually called 1 of every 4 flagrant Bama fouls. If there are 48 fouls and 12 are called, that's just proof of rigging; yet they spin it to imply that the refs who stole the game for bama were "hard on bama." Notice if AL vommits a penslty snd it us called, that is extraordinary because it never happens and "hard" on Saban. They keep repeating that vague misleading fact, as you say, in place a review of the game.
The Big12 officials called several calls against Bama early -- and the calls were all correct. No one has disputed a single one!!!
But they freaked out when they realized that TX -- who they hated more than AL because they are leaving for the SEC -- was actually going to win a fairly called game. So they rigged numerous calls. It was flagrant.
The 3 plays I cited are 2 + 7 + 3 = 12 points.
@InVOLuntary hasn't protested so I take that as me being welcome. Besides, if I do it properly, he'll never know I'm there.
What I am saying how ironic it is they spend that time making fun of and degrading people, yet are aware that the should provide a deaf interpretation of that slop. Maybe woke is the wrong term. I just think it is an odd combo.I’m sorry, are you saying someone having a sign language interpreter for the hearing impaired is “woke”?
And yet, there were plenty of us screaming for him to be the starter.Check out this stat line for JT Shrout:
Colorado vs. Air Force - Game Summary - September 10, 2022 - ESPN
But He knew the planet rotated, right? Also, I think that is why He told us there was day and there was night, one day, so we didn’t have to speculate. We know it was a day as we know it.
Wow.No, it wasn't "horrendous," it was rigged.
The safety alone is proof the game was rigged and more than the margin of victory.
But there is also the Bama PI that cost TX a TD early. More than margin victory.
The scramble they are bragging on that set up Bama's "winning" FG was a flagrant two hand hold by Bama's right OT. That turned a -20 yd and loss of down play into a +20 yd play for the first down and the FG. That's a 40 yd swing and the play that "won" the game.
"Horrendous" and "incompetent" are the cover stories. The other cover story here is that they actually called approximately 1 of every 4 flagrant Bama fouls. If there are 48 fouls and 12 are called, that's just proof of rigging; yet they spin it to imply that the refs who stole the game for bama were "hard on bama." Notice if AL commits a penalty and it is called, that is extraordinary because it never happens and therefore"hard" on Saban. They keep repeating that vague misleading fact, as you say, in place a review of the game.
This is the bottom line: The Big12 officials called several calls against Bama early -- and the calls were all correct. No one has disputed a single one!!! They enjoyed it because everyone knows bama is allowed to foul with impunity.
But they freaked out when they realized that TX -- who they hated more than AL because they are leaving for the SEC -- was actually going to win a fairly called game. So they rigged numerous calls. It was flagrant.
The 3 plays I cited are 2 + 7 + 3 = 12 points.
"It just happened" is comically reductive and screams of a strawman. Biological and chemical/neurochemical processes, all of which follow cause and effect logic, over millions of years, isn't "it just happened". It's a slow burn of natural processes over time, weeding out things that didn't work (tautologically true), necessarily remaining are the things that did work. On one planet (afawk) out of many. Though it seems highly probable to have occurred on other planets as well, given the quantity of potential instances.
Nor are they mutually exclusive. A god and a set of natural processes can both exist and there's no requirement for how it was set up. Everyone just assumes its (god's) qualities and the setup.
Frank, go ahead and move this to the wasteland thread so the innocent folk aren't bothered on a beautiful Saturday![]()
I know exactly what you’re going off of, but I didn’t take it that way (not meaning it right). I took it as tongue in cheek and a little locker room like talk. Heck, I say the same stuff about myself at work. We’re all busting each other’s balls (those who have them)Actually didn't like that. They equivocated Will actually being responsive to partners as being "the grunt guy". Lost a little respect for Boogie. Will is the man. Maybe needs a little Will Smith-Chris Rock momentjkjk real gentlemen fight with knives, but only after bacon and waffles