Roe vs Wade Overturned

#3,626
#3,626
Allvols1996 said:
You can’t have individual rights without individuals. So, yes, you can be libertarian and pro-life.
Click to expand...
You can be pro-life but not really pro govt regulation

Allvols1996 said:
Yes. I’m not the one making a positive claim. You are saying these rights exist, so please show me where they exist.
Click to expand...
Are you unfamiliar with natural rights? They can exist without govt. Actually they should exist outside govt and any good govt should recognize them
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, 85SugarVol and hog88
#3,627
#3,627
Allvols1996 said:
Yes. I’m not the one making a positive claim. You are saying these rights exist, so please show me where they exist.
Click to expand...

I can't show you where. But you can't show me any evidence of a government granting basic human rights either.
 
#3,631
#3,631
utvolpj said:
You can be pro-life but not really pro govt regulation


Are you unfamiliar with natural rights? They can exist without govt. Actually they should exist outside govt and any good govt should recognize them
Click to expand...
Sure you can. Libertarians aren’t anarchist. There is a growing trend in the movement that is borderline anarchy, but that isn’t the party at its core.
 
#3,633
#3,633
utvolpj said:
Are you unfamiliar with natural rights? They can exist without govt. Actually they should exist outside govt and any good govt should recognize them
Click to expand...
Familiar with them? yes, as a concept. Do I think they hold up? Only in the sense if we are speaking about some universal human worth like what Aquinas described. If you get into Lockeian ideas it gets a little tricky to support. That’s where Jefferson borrowed much of his work for the DOI.
 
#3,634
#3,634
utvolpj said:
So they're now in favor of govt laws limiting individual freedoms? Interesting shift
Click to expand...
Only if you look at through that lens. Life is the basic, fundamental, property of individualism. Impossible to separate the two. How can you have true liberty if you are in danger of having your future wiped out before you exit the protective confines of your Mother?? Kind of pulls the rug out on that, no?
 
#3,638
#3,638
bnhunt said:
It's the woman's right to choose what she does with her body. It's not your choice or mine.
Click to expand...

Yet women can't sell body parts for money, neither can men. Anyways, define a woman. The baby sure didn't have a choice to get their brains sucked out. What did that baby do?
 
#3,640
#3,640
utvolpj said:
So they're now in favor of govt laws limiting individual freedoms? Interesting shift
Click to expand...
Do you see laws against murder as the same shift? The premise that being against killing a life is some how contradictory to anti gov is asinine.

If you view the baby as an individual, which scientifically it is, then protecting his or her life is the first moral test. I'm not libertarian but I don't see the contradiction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Allvols1996
#3,643
#3,643
utvols88 said:
Do you see laws against murder as the same shift? The premise that being against killing a life is some how contradictory to anti gov is asinine.

If you view the baby as an individual, which scientifically it is, then protecting his or her life is the first moral test. I'm not libertarian but I don't see the contradiction.
Click to expand...

The concept of individuality is a value-based judgment. Science does not deal in value-based judgements.
 
#3,644
#3,644
PKT_VOL said:
The concept of individuality is a value-based judgment. Science does not deal in value-based judgements.
Click to expand...
Being an individual is attained by having your own DNA making you your own being. The turtle inside the egg is an individual. When it hatches, it is still an individual. There's nothing value based about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,646
#3,646
utvols88 said:
Being an individual is attained by having your own DNA making you your own being. The turtle inside the egg is an individual. When it hatches, it is still an individual. There's nothing value based about it.
Click to expand...

Regardless of however you feel about what constitutes "individuality", it is your own philosophical value judgment. It is not a scientific one as science does not and cannot make those judgements.
 
#3,647
#3,647
PKT_VOL said:
Regardless of however you feel about what constitutes "individuality", it is your own philosophical value judgment. It is not a scientific one as science does not and cannot make those judgements.
Click to expand...

Science can absolutely state those are two separate life forms. Which seems to be the going definition of individual. A separate human life
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,648
#3,648
Vol8188 said:
Science can absolutely state those are two separate life forms. Which seems to be the going definition of individual. A separate human life
Click to expand...

Science cannot do that. What constitutes "two separate life forms" is a philosophical value judgement.

Science can only design falsifiable experiments to test whether a specific criteria is present within a previously delineated philosophical framework.
 
#3,650
#3,650
PKT_VOL said:
Science cannot do that. What constitutes "two separate life forms" is a philosophical value judgement.

Science can only design falsifiable experiments to test whether a specific criteria is present within a previously delineated philosophical framework.
Click to expand...

It seems scientist make the distinction between life and none life, and distinguish one life form from another constantly. So I’m not sure I’m following
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top