SugarCC
Gntlmen, u cant fight here, this is the war room!
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 8,756
- Likes
- 41,520
Tonight, i have found myself in conversations about the Stones being "garbage", The Beatles making "experimental crap", and "Elvis was not a rock n roll star...he was Frank Sinatra". It's my fault...I'm slipping, especially...
...here. I know why you do it, Prof, think the way you do about Elvis...anyone who pays attention knows. Ill end with this, Elvis was more Mississippi Delta than Brown ever was; more so than many others, also. James Brown grew up singing and playing and dancing to the music that he loved and was surrounded by, and he died doing it, too...so did Elvis. Rock n roll wasn't born the day Elvis walked into Sun, not at all; however, it WAS the day that he introduced rock n roll to the world. And, he was as good as ANYONE at doing it.
And not a single post about Taylor Swift.Finally after a long day at work and then church, I get to sit down to catch up, and there’s so many pages! Imagine my disappointment when y’all are arguing musical taste…again. LOL I remember my college music professor saying after he went over how the Beatles grew in 10 years what it took classical hundreds of years, and they led the way for many others that came after them, that there were always those that had to make themselves superior to whatever was popular and find ways to put it down. He said we like what we like, and we can also study and appreciate what is excellent without having to mix the two. So someone can have an amazing voice that people love to hear sing because it touches them even if that voice barely goes over an octave. And you can appreciate a singer that hits 4 octaves flawlessly without ever wanting to play a song of theirs again. Y’all brought that back to my memory from 1984!!!Music! “Rocky Top” is the best!
100%Finally after a long day at work and then church, I get to sit down to catch up, and there’s so many pages! Imagine my disappointment when y’all are arguing musical taste…again. LOL I remember my college music professor saying after he went over how the Beatles grew in 10 years what it took classical hundreds of years, and they led the way for many others that came after them, that there were always those that had to make themselves superior to whatever was popular and find ways to put it down. He said we like what we like, and we can also study and appreciate what is excellent without having to mix the two. So someone can have an amazing voice that people love to hear sing because it touches them even if that voice barely goes over an octave. And you can appreciate a singer that hits 4 octaves flawlessly without ever wanting to play a song of theirs again. Y’all brought that back to my memory from 1984!!!Music! “Rocky Top” is the best!
Jmo but it is the lack of knowledge/care to look further, which is fine...whatever. But if one has never personally delved into them and only saw the videos of the british invasion/girls screaming at them and heard a few songs...I can get why the misunderstanding.I know what the rock n rollers and experts say, but the vast majority of everyday rock n roll fans I know wonder why everyone thinks the Beatles are so great. Personally, I think they truly are among the greats, and I think they deserve a lot of credit as groundbreakers and originalists. However, their early stuff doesn’t seem like much more than bubble gum pop to me, and I can think of as many as 10 other rock acts - including Led Zeppelin - that I would choose to listen to over them.
He sounded great at Bonnaroo. And Stevie Nicks even better. Better than ever.
Really really wish I could catch Roger Waters touring right now. Word is it is spectacular.
Saw Dew Bee Brothers, in mid 80's. Then Mars She'll Tuckher at Grandfather Mtn back in the day. Not sure if Blues Traveller and Lenny Kravitz count, but Horde Festival was stout.
Elvis is the most versatile vocalist I've ever heard, and I'm sick of the "derivative"
Elvis did what he loved and he grew up in that culture..the music he loved influenced him...big f'n deal.
Kinetic comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider in collegiate baseball pitchers - PubMedThat’s different than what every shoulder and elbow specialist shows. Little league shoulder and elbow comes from too many pitches affecting growth plates. Torque from pitching is more with curves…
Jmo but it is the lack of knowledge/care to look further, which is fine...whatever. But if one has never personally delved into them and only saw the videos of the british invasion/girls screaming at them and heard a few songs...I can get why the misunderstanding.
Then you do the research and realize all that is reality and that's when appreciation goes full blown and beyond.
Watching The Yellow Submarine from an altered mental state helps quicken the appreciation process too![]()
How old is your son?
Overuse is what wrecks their arms. Not following strict pitching limits…even worse is poor mechanics. Regardless of the pitch type , high repetition of poor mechanics is the main culprit.
Most Tommy John surgery pitchers will tell you that in order to return to pitching, they were essentially forced to learn proper mechanics to be successful. Look at Ben Joyce’s mechanics now. Pretty dang good. If you compare it to pre-surgery, then I would bet it’s significantly different.
I read parts of the article, the author throws anecdotal evidence in next to the scientific articles that he quotes…Dr. James Andrews perfected the Tommy John surgery and what I posted above is pretty much verbatim from him. Poor mechanics plus excessive pitching results in injury and damage to these young pitchers.