lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 75,186
- Likes
- 44,496
Back then a loosely organized but in some respext trained group of men prepared to jointly defend their communities. It was not individuals. If you are reading that, read Hamilton in the Federalist Papers.
I understand that the VERY FIRST RULE of statutory construction is that it is assumed that each part of a statute has meaning, ie is there for a reason. The gun nut position on this is utterly ridiculous because the phrase about a well regulated militia as the reason for the right to keep and bear arms just completely evaporates. The phrase is entirely read out of any significance which makes no sense, at all.
Back then a loosely organized but in some respext trained group of men prepared to jointly defend their communities. It was not individuals. If you are reading that, read Hamilton in the Federalist Papers.
I understand that the VERY FIRST RULE of statutory construction is that it is assumed that each part of a statute has meaning, ie is there for a reason. The gun nut position on this is utterly ridiculous because the phrase about a well regulated militia as the reason for the right to keep and bear arms just completely evaporates. The phrase is entirely read out of any significance which makes no sense, at all.
Why did you specifically pick Hamilton and avoid giving Jefferson as an example ?![]()
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787
Yea, Hamilton was a Federalist to the core.
Also a big fan of the standing army…
Any Republican that supports this should be immediately recalled and/or voted out of office.
Look at the $ getting ready to be handed out. It’s pathetic.
- Allots more than $100 million to states and tribal authorities in the form of grants to “expand” mental health services, including mental health services delivered on school campuses
- Expands Byrne JAG grant program to cover implementation of “extreme risk protection orders,” a/k/a red flag laws, with zero framework for that except a cursory, “don’t violate their due process rights” warning
- As prohibiting factors, include juvenile criminal convictions (after 16 years) and admission to a mental hospital.
- Enhances sentencing for “straw purchasers” under federal law
- (Laughably), goes after drug dealers/cartels to stop gun-running (more in the additional piece).
- Allocates $100,000,000 to the FBI for “salaries and expenses…to meet additional resource needs of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System”
- Awards $1,400,000,000 (yes, that’s $1.4 billion) to the FBI for “State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance,” $750 million of which is earmarked for Byrne JAG grants
- $100,000,000 to the FBI to be used “for competitive grants to be administered by the Community Oriented Policing Services Office for purposes authorized under the STOP School Violence Act of 2018”
Pluralist - Text of Senate Gun Bill Released, and Your Rights Are Dangling by a Thread – Opinion
Look at the $ getting ready to be handed out. It’s pathetic.
- Allots more than $100 million to states and tribal authorities in the form of grants to “expand” mental health services, including mental health services delivered on school campuses
- Expands Byrne JAG grant program to cover implementation of “extreme risk protection orders,” a/k/a red flag laws, with zero framework for that except a cursory, “don’t violate their due process rights” warning
- As prohibiting factors, include juvenile criminal convictions (after 16 years) and admission to a mental hospital.
- Enhances sentencing for “straw purchasers” under federal law
- (Laughably), goes after drug dealers/cartels to stop gun-running (more in the additional piece).
- Allocates $100,000,000 to the FBI for “salaries and expenses…to meet additional resource needs of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System”
- Awards $1,400,000,000 (yes, that’s $1.4 billion) to the FBI for “State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance,” $750 million of which is earmarked for Byrne JAG grants
- $100,000,000 to the FBI to be used “for competitive grants to be administered by the Community Oriented Policing Services Office for purposes authorized under the STOP School Violence Act of 2018”
Pluralist - Text of Senate Gun Bill Released, and Your Rights Are Dangling by a Thread – Opinion
Look at the $ getting ready to be handed out. It’s pathetic.
- Allots more than $100 million to states and tribal authorities in the form of grants to “expand” mental health services, including mental health services delivered on school campuses
- Expands Byrne JAG grant program to cover implementation of “extreme risk protection orders,” a/k/a red flag laws, with zero framework for that except a cursory, “don’t violate their due process rights” warning
- As prohibiting factors, include juvenile criminal convictions (after 16 years) and admission to a mental hospital.
- Enhances sentencing for “straw purchasers” under federal law
- (Laughably), goes after drug dealers/cartels to stop gun-running (more in the additional piece).
- Allocates $100,000,000 to the FBI for “salaries and expenses…to meet additional resource needs of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System”
- Awards $1,400,000,000 (yes, that’s $1.4 billion) to the FBI for “State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance,” $750 million of which is earmarked for Byrne JAG grants
- $100,000,000 to the FBI to be used “for competitive grants to be administered by the Community Oriented Policing Services Office for purposes authorized under the STOP School Violence Act of 2018”
Pluralist - Text of Senate Gun Bill Released, and Your Rights Are Dangling by a Thread – Opinion
That's the intent.The whole bill is a joke, watered down, and won't do a thing to stop the killings, and access to guns by people who shouldn't have access. It should simply be called The ******** Bill.
Still, the fact remains that his logic is flawed as evidenced by the counterpoint created by these facts, which are just a few of the many of such examples that point out that the “right to defend myself” is defended much more vigorously than other rights regardless of consequence… and that normally people prefer to address real problems in lieu of indulging in unfettered hobbies.
