War in Ukraine

#34,827
#34,827
FLVOL_79 said:
If you are losing Generals in modern warfare you might be a third world country..
Click to expand...
Yeah, our generals fight from the safety of a hardened bunker in the Pentagon. There won't be any more 9-11 planes interrupt their tea and crumpets anymore.
 
#34,828
#34,828
NorthDallas40 said:
Well technically they did… then the US and Russia talked them into giving them up and Russia assured them there would be no hostilities or provocations against them if they did so. Whoopsie!
Click to expand...
That sounds like the promises democrats are making about giving up our 2nd amendment rights.
 
#34,829
#34,829
NorthDallas40 said:
Well technically they did… then the US and Russia talked them into giving them up and Russia assured them there would be no hostilities or provocations against them if they did so. Whoopsie!
Click to expand...

They probably never had missile launch codes though and free falls were taken out I would think.
 
#34,830
#34,830
Orangeburst said:
They probably never had missile launch codes though and free falls were taken out I would think.
Click to expand...
Much of the Russian nuclear infrastructure and development was in Ukraine. So I think it’s a bit of a red herring to assume they wouldn’t be able to make use of those resources. The day after the end of the USSR Ukraine had the third largest nuclear Arsenal in the world. And they had the science and infrastructure to support it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79 and Orangeburst
#34,833
#34,833
NorthDallas40 said:
Much of the Russian nuclear infrastructure and development was in Ukraine. So I think it’s a bit of a red herring to assume they wouldn’t be able to make use of those resources. The day after the end of the USSR Ukraine had the third largest nuclear Arsenal in the world. And they had the science and infrastructure to support it.
Click to expand...


ICBM's have a minimum range though.
I get it...they had them...but it was not simple and would require a lot of money to repurpose on to some other platform, if even available, in which IRBM's do not seem to exist
 
#34,835
#34,835
Orangeburst said:
ICBM's have a minimum range though.
I get it...they had them...but it was not simple and would require a lot of money to repurpose on to some other platform, if even available, in which IRBM's do not seem to exist
Click to expand...
Just possession of the weapons and the science to support them is a deterrent. Had we minded our damn business in 1994 this current situation likely doesn’t exist.
 
#34,839
#34,839
Orangeburst said:
Why the semantics?
Click to expand...
It's not semantics. For some reason, you are not clearly articulating my position.

Orangeburst said:
By your metrics, Ukraine should have nukes now.
Click to expand...
Had they had nukes, it is likely that the Russians would not have invaded... which makes my point. I thought I have been clear, but I guess I need to say it one more time, that nukes are a deterrent and a useful defensive tool.
 
#34,843
#34,843
volgr said:
Hey, you finally posted an actual death. He died outside Popasnaya.
Click to expand...
Can’t hide from this one since it’s already been acknowledged on the pro Russian shill pipeline huh Larry? I’ll guess you’ll still claim NUH UH on the one shot down in an SU-25 on June 2 though 🤡
 
#34,846
#34,846
DonjoVol said:
I've seen that from the anti Candace crowd as well.
Click to expand...
No you haven’t Curly but I realize your smooth brain isn’t equipped to process the difference.

She doesn’t have the resume to be fit for political office /= women in general don’t make good leaders.

Run along now and ponder the difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#34,847
#34,847
NorthDallas40 said:
No you haven’t Curly but I realize your smooth brain isn’t equipped to process the difference.

She doesn’t have the resume to be fit for political office /= women in general don’t make good leaders.

Run along now and ponder the difference.
Click to expand...
Also seen the same from the anti Tulsi crowd. These old geezers, democrats and anti Trumpers hate very attractive, independent thinking women. They prefer Hillary, Whoopi, Liz Warren and Joy Behar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#34,849
#34,849
DonjoVol said:
Also seen the same from the anti Tulsi crowd. These old geezers, democrats and anti Trumpers hate very attractive, independent thinking women. They prefer Hillary, Whoopi, Liz Warren and Joy Behar.
Click to expand...
That is absolutely stupid as hell. Well done Curly! 🤡
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top