Why would we want to ban assault rifles and handguns given there's no correlation between gun ownership and homicide?
I created the original post, and I just answered that question. If you do not like my purpose for creating the post, I think it is because you do not like my answer to your question. Blowing up this discussion into a cloud of facts about tangential issues does not change the facts I've stated or the purpose I stated them.
What proof do you have that taking away guns will cause homicide rates to drop? Sure, gun deaths may go down, but what's the point if people just opt to kill in a different fashion? Isn't the goal to lower the actual homicide rate? As has been stated, your stats do not support that the homicide rate will drop.I created the original post, and I just answered that question. If you do not like my purpose for creating the post, I think it is because you do not like my answer to your question. Blowing up this discussion into a cloud of facts about tangential issues does not change the facts I've stated or the purpose I stated them.
What proof do you have that taking away guns will cause homicide rates to drop? Sure, gun deaths may go down, but what's the point if people just opt to kill in a different fashion? Isn't the goal to lower the actual homicide rate? As has been stated, your stats do not support that the homicide rate will drop.
You're still ignoring the fact that it's not the guns. The problem is the people who decide to kill others.
Cough, because there is a correlation between gun ownership and gun deaths. That 18 year old who just murdered 21 people at an elementary school used a high capacity, high powered semi-automatic rifle.
He committed homocide. He did not walk in and provide a pistol to nineteen kids and two teachers who decided they wanted to commit suicide.This thread is not about arsenic and old lace. It was prompted from another school shooting by an eighteen year old former student who bought two AR-15 style rifles the day after he turned eighteen and a few days later murdered 21 people in an elementary school.
He committed homocide. He did not walk in and provide a pistol to nineteen kids and two teachers who decided they wanted to commit suicide.
I don’t know about Wyoming, but Alaska leads the country in depression and domestic abuse. it is believed to be directly related to long nights and periods of being shut-in (Hello? Calling Dr. Fauci and his merry band of government control freaks).
What you’re failing to realize is for every “bad minded” individual that passes a background check and walks out with said AR15, 100 other good minded individuals did the same. Here’s the real problem. “Bad minded” individuals leave the house with AR15 in hand because they know what they’re about to do where good minded individuals leave theirs at home where it belongs. So the best we can hope for is a handgun vs an AR when they clash and even that’s a slim chance that a CCW holder will be present at the scene.No, you miss the point, which you should realize without assistance. The problem is a combining of certain types of people with certain types of guns. The reality is that so long as high capacity, high powered rifles are available to the general public, they will be purchased and used by numbers of bad minded individuals to commit mass murders.
He could just as easily have done it with 2 ruger Mark VIIs.Cough, because there is a correlation between gun ownership and gun deaths. That 18 year old who just murdered 21 people at an elementary school used a high capacity, high powered semi-automatic rifle.
That gun buying license doesnt help his situation. Or 90% of these shooters incidents. You already have to pass a back ground check.
All you are doing is making it more difficult for the normal, law abiding, citizen.
He could just as easily have done it with 2 ruger Mark VIIs.
You’re too focused on the scary, black “assault” rifle and not focused enough on anything else.