KnoxLandcruiser
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,547
- Likes
- 5,459
What's the purpose of using number 3 in place of Z?
Russia isn't giving up the eastern and southern area. Ukraine had the opportunity to negotiate a settlement with the Minsk II ceasefire agreements and still maintain their country. But instead, NATO put a battery in their backs and assured them that NATO was behind them and would support them if Russia did anything. NATO had no serious intentions as of now to do nothing more than just flood the area with weapons and empty their old stockpiles. They don't have the stomach, for now at least, to put a significant number of NATO boots on the ground outside of military advisors.
If there was an overwhelming desire to grab Donbas and the Black Sea coast, then Putin would have grabbed it back in 2014 when those areas had referendums declaring their independence and desire to join Russia. But instead, his hope was that a diplomatic solution could have been achieved through the Minsk ceasefire agreements.Sooooo. It's not about the Nazi's and was really all about a land grab to begin with?
So how does stealing this land help de nazify Ukraine?If there was an overwhelming desire to grab Donbas and the Black Sea coast, then Putin would have grabbed it back in 2014 when those areas had referendums declaring their independence and desire to join Russia. But instead, his hope was that a diplomatic solution could have been achieved through the Minsk ceasefire agreements.
2014 Donbas status referendums - Wikipedia
From you own damn link Moe! The referendum is illegitimate and not per the Ukraine constitution!If there was an overwhelming desire to grab Donbas and the Black Sea coast, then Putin would have grabbed it back in 2014 when those areas had referendums declaring their independence and desire to join Russia. But instead, his hope was that a diplomatic solution could have been achieved through the Minsk ceasefire agreements.
2014 Donbas status referendums - Wikipedia
The US has acted like the biggest thugs on the planet over the last 2-3 decades. We don't have clean laundry by any stretch.
And at some point, reality has to set in. The more the US and NATO feeds weapons into Ukraine, the more it will prolong the inevitable. Meanwhile, not only will more Ukrainians possibly die, but you also run the risk of one mistake or false flag nudging us towards a nuclear exchange. Ukraine will not win this conflict. You know this. NATO knows this. So why prolong this any further? Allow 3elensky to go to the negotiating table and hammer out an honest deal.
You are out of your mind again. There would have been no need for Ukraine to attack Russian backed separatists had Pootin not violated the 1994 Budapest Agreement and invaded Crimea and Donbas.You are thinking backwards. There would be no need to "steal" the land had those NAZIs and the Ukrainian govt not been attacking the Donbas for 8 years.
Now I'm curious about what you are talking about here. Outside of me blaming a corrupt govt in Kiev that the Obama State Department established in 2014, I'm not sure I understand where you are going with that. Also, I'm not blaming the people of Ukraine or I don't think I've blamed the people of any other country that we have meddled with that I know of. If you can find that example, I would be interested to see that because I may want to clarify that, if possible.I agree with you that we keep diddling in places we don't belong, but for a different reason than you. We've been backing people who don't have the real will to fight for themselves, and that makes Ukraine different. They are fighting to win and to keep their country; that's pretty noble and remarkable these days. Unlike you, I don't hold it against the country that we've meddled where we shouldn't; I blame our "leaders" for blundering to appear strong. Unfortunately we keep electing the same people and expecting something different.
They had every opportunity to maintain their country had they simply followed the Minsk II ceasefire agreement. Now that the conflict is in full gear, they have to settle for the best deal they can get. That is the gamble that the Kiev regime made based on NATO pimping them up and leading them to believe that NATO was going to support them 1000%.That still goes back to why should Ukraine negotiate away territory that belongs to Ukraine?
No they didn’t you disingenuous sycophant because Minsk II only exists because your asshat hero tore up the actual agreement and seized land by invading Ukraine.They had every opportunity to maintain their country had they simply followed the Minsk II ceasefire agreement. Now that the conflict is in full gear, they have to settle for the best deal they can get. That is the gamble that the Kiev regime made based on NATO pimping them up and leading them to believe that NATO was going to support them 1000%.
Now I'm curious about what you are talking about here. Outside of me blaming a corrupt govt in Kiev that the Obama State Department established in 2014, I'm not sure I understand where you are going with that. Also, I'm not blaming the people of Ukraine or I don't think I've blamed the people of any other country that we have meddled with that I know of. If you can find that example, I would be interested to see that because I may want to clarify that, if possible.
I couldn't disagree more in either situation. I've expressed my reasons several times about Russia-Ukraine and I do not feel like getting into the Iraq-Kuwait thing right now (April Glaspie, babies in incubators and protecting democracy in Kuwait, which is a monarchy).I had no problem with driving Iraq out of Kuwait, or helping drive Russia out of Ukraine. Those have an invader and a victim - and they weren't civil wars or insurgencies.