NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 59,075
- Likes
- 86,200
If the US military was blessed with a loss of 8 generals in 51 days I would be elated, especially if they are the woke idiots like Milley and the sec of defense (what's his name) that his boss can never remember.
But they won in WWII. And winning is the point.
US industry determined the result. It was a war of attrition that Germany couldn’t keep up with. Russia pounded their face against Germany’s fist until their hand broke. That isn’t prowess that’s just a willingness to throw meat into the meat grinder until it clogs up. Lots of … “skill” there.US industry had a lot to do with the result. But it was the Russians fighting and winning on the Eastern Front.
The goalposts are migrating rapidly this year. Yeah to all that, but the Russians won the fighting on the Eastern Front, so they won. The other Allies won their theaters too.Won what? The allies caved to their demands because they were tired of fighting and had to finish off the Japanese halfway across the globe. You misspelled the US, British, and Russians won in Europe. The US did nearly all of the heavy lifting against the Japanese while fighting the Germans.
The goal posts related to Russia sucking at any military skill and leadership are fully in tact despite your efforts to bob and weave around them to try and offer up silly definitions of military leadershipThe goalposts are migrating rapidly this year. Yeah to all that, but the Russians won the fighting on the Eastern Front, so they won. The other Allies won their theaters too.
US industry had a lot to do with the result. But it was the Russians fighting and winning on the Eastern Front.
Of course they got a lot of outside material, but it was the Russian military that beat the Germans The Russian winter is the Russian winter. That shouldn't have come as any surprise to the Germans. They tried biting off more than they could chew.Russia would have fallen to the Germans in WW2 without supplies from the allies and Hitler’s meddling. They were essentially saved by the weather against Napoleon and Hitler. They employed extremely poor tactics and simply overwhelmed the Germans with sheer numbers with no consideration for Russian infantry losses. They employed the same basic tactics in WW1 with little to no consideration for Russian infantry losses.
Who mentioned prowess or skill? I never said their strategy was brilliant. I said they won the Eastern Front.US industry determined the result. It was a war of attrition that Germany couldn’t keep up with. Russia pounded their face against Germany’s fist until their hand broke. That isn’t prowess that’s just a willingness to throw meat into the meat grinder until it clogs up. Lots of … “skill” there.
Sure thing Sherlock. To what post did I reply?I did.
“Assad is still there no?”
That’s pretty blatantly a reference to Syria in a discussion about the Russian military that is occurring.
Or are you saying you incorrectly brought up Syria in the discussion and saying the Russian military isn’t fighting?
Ah so you are claiming the end result of victory points to some skill or prowess in their part! That is your whole point.But they won.
Good to see they’ve evolved in the past 100 years.Russia would have fallen to the Germans in WW2 without supplies from the allies and Hitler’s meddling. They were essentially saved by the weather against Napoleon and Hitler. They employed extremely poor tactics and simply overwhelmed the Germans with sheer numbers with no consideration for Russian infantry losses. They employed the same basic tactics in WW1 with little to no consideration for Russian infantry losses.
Of course they got a lot of outside material, but it was the Russian military that beat the Germans The Russian winter is the Russian winter. That shouldn't have come as any surprise to the Germans.