Ulysees E. McGill
This season is for you Sweets
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 56,305
- Likes
- 151,443
Or he could look up his actual stats and realize that he had given up 19 runs in 19 innings….. he was averaging less than 1 strikeout per inning at 15…. We really struggled against him but to move on and get ready for this weekend.So he could've pitched 1 game all season for 1 inning and allowed 1 run and have an ERA of 9 basically.
Again...the problem is the bent ones out there changing outcomes on purpose for one reason or another. It breeds suspicion and every honest official suffers for it...Some people are just terrible as umps. Doesn't mean they should be punched. I think every parent should have to umpire a game for other teams to see how hard it is. I have to call lines in volleyball all the time and when people complain about my calls I happily offer them the job. I've never had another person take it.
No C-section unless medically warranted.I want to assure everyone, that even though the BaseVols dropped a game last night I am as committed as ever to having TV's baby. I know TV and the BaseVols will get back on track this weekend vs the gumps and the baby will be doing somersaults in celebration. I am considering a c-section though and would welcome any thoughts on the situation.
Chaos is bad..there has to be some kind of roster control.It's pretty clear imo
Sankey and SEC schools wanted to "join the party" and not be seen as the only regressive conference...and yet they added in this restrictive qualifier to still have some control over player movement. Ultimately, guys like Saban never wanted one iota of this. The schools would happily go back to when there were no transfers at all and players were held under lock and key.
They only gave in, at the bare minimum, to avoid the flak they've seen the NCAA take on for years. Ultimately, the schools (the members of the NCAA association) have always wanted full control and always will.
If one has large volumes of data to support anomalies, then by all means. But general paranoia is what every fanbase has. EVERY. I mean the freakin UK fanbase has a website dedicated to showing how SEC refs are anti-Kentucky.Again...the problem is the bent ones out there changing outcomes on purpose for one reason or another. It breeds suspicion and every honest official suffers for it...
Do you really think officiating in the SEC is above board?
Milton has to be one of the most frustrating QBs ever...it is baffling how such an obviously intelligent guy just completely vapor locks in real competition. It is obviously all in his head...if Heupel and Halzle could be the ones that finds the key that unlocks all that talent...records would fall.when Nico wore the Honco shirt:
This guy is inescapable:
Random:
You and your f'n robots..AI is going to destroy humanity according to many futurists..and you can't wait for it..Can't wait till robot umps become a thing.
Nobody will ever talk back to T-1000.
There needs to be real severe accountability for umps...period. We have been screwed over so many times by these bent MFers that you have to be blund and stupid not to see it...that is where the anger comes from...officials having godlike powers and no real accountability for horrible horrible decisions that completely f over players and fans.Two reasonable people can have a discussion.
But 100,000 can't. And then suddenly bottles, golf balls, el tri batteries, etc become the pathetic norm. And then it's excused. Unless it's South American refs...who get killed right there on the field.
Jmo but it should be zero tolerance for all verbal or physical assaults. It is a freakin game and it's ridiculously childish. Society needs to grow up.
You and your f'n robots..AI is going to destroy humanity according to many futurists..and you can't wait for it..
Edit: That is obviously not what I believe is going to happen since I believe in Jesus, but for you guys that are unbelievers, it seems you would be more...uhmm..wary of AI.
I agree from the outside looking in; but if you really, truly believe someone is intentionally screwing you out of a fair game after years and years of training and dedication, it's not a stretch to see how some people would think violence against officials is justified. I've absolutely had the impulse to punch a ref before, and in the moment I believed I would be 100% right for doing so.If one has large volumes of data to support anomalies, then by all means. But general paranoia is what every fanbase has. EVERY. I mean the freakin UK fanbase has a website dedicated to showing how SEC refs are anti-Kentucky.
Jmo but you should atleast have hard evidence for such accusations. Otherwise, it's just a dime a dozen finger being pointed, as every fanbase in every sport on earth does.
Regardless, no amount of paranoia or skepticism can ever justify assault, verbal or physical, toward someone. It's just a form of entertainment at the end of the day. Build your case, make sure it's bulletproof, then present it for consideration. But throwing fists or bottles does nothing but scare away the good ones. It's a childish response that has no place in mere sport.
Bingo...a guy that makes several horrible calls that screws teams over should be fired immediately and never step on SEC field again...and it should be public.I will say it again, but the conference is partly to blame for what happened against Ole Miss. Sure, what some people did was childish and unacceptable, but if you truly want to analyze the situation, the conference plays a hand by trotting out the same guys who make mistakes. If you don’t hold them accountable and put out a bad product, then you are part of the problem. It was only a matter of time that something like that happened, and it ended up at UT.
This discussion can go down a rabbit hole. But there are lessons to be learned by holding people accountable, too.
If you think officiating is not biased towards favorites in the SEC...then you are blind. I don't care about stupid UK idiots.If one has large volumes of data to support anomalies, then by all means. But general paranoia is what every fanbase has. EVERY. I mean the freakin UK fanbase has a website dedicated to showing how SEC refs are anti-Kentucky.
Jmo but you should atleast have hard evidence for such accusations. Otherwise, it's just a dime a dozen finger being pointed, as every fanbase in every sport on earth does.
Regardless, no amount of paranoia or skepticism can ever justify assault, verbal or physical, toward someone. It's just a form of entertainment at the end of the day. Build your case, make sure it's bulletproof, then present it for consideration. But throwing fists or bottles does nothing but scare away the good ones. It's a childish response that has no place in mere sport.
Some of those arrogant bent crooks deserve to get their ass whipped.If one has large volumes of data to support anomalies, then by all means. But general paranoia is what every fanbase has. EVERY. I mean the freakin UK fanbase has a website dedicated to showing how SEC refs are anti-Kentucky.
Jmo but you should atleast have hard evidence for such accusations. Otherwise, it's just a dime a dozen finger being pointed, as every fanbase in every sport on earth does.
Regardless, no amount of paranoia or skepticism can ever justify assault, verbal or physical, toward someone. It's just a form of entertainment at the end of the day. Build your case, make sure it's bulletproof, then present it for consideration. But throwing fists or bottles does nothing but scare away the good ones. It's a childish response that has no place in mere sport.
They can be programmed to cheat..and even make it look better.cmon man. It is software built upon sensors, motion, detection collision, machine learning, etc...like self driving cars...don't think self-driving cars are going to overthrow humanity
There's a huuuge gap between this and true AI, which yes every futurist is properly wary of. Asimov was one of the first and he immediately pointed his noggin thoughts toward the cautionary perspective.
But to take the AI cautionary perspective and turn it into a strawman argument against all things even remotely adjacent (even less than adjacent) does no one any good. If we can find a significantly safer way to operate our vehicles or a significantly better way to ref our sports, then why not?
My question is if "great" or perfect refs actually even exist or are they a figment of our imagination...like hiring the perfect coach. The NFL has awful reffing too (just ask Saints fans) and those are supposed to be the best in the world. But they'll make mistakes. Tons of them. That's human reffing for you. So what expectation do we have for refs? Are they realistic considering human limitations to perceiving movement?There needs to be real severe accountability for umps...period. We have been screwed over so many times by these bent MFers that you have to be blund and stupid not to see it...that is where the anger comes from...officials having godlike powers and no real accountability for horrible horrible decisions that completely f over players and fans.