Recruiting Forum Football Talk IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vasectomy for 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
will-ferrel-say-what.gif
 
Woof. Yes, and by such logic we should be ranked below Texas...

We're talking using overall analysis. The committee doesn't seriously go down an infinite tree of head to head matchups, that would be insane and cyclical. Mere H2H does not determine overall rankings.

UK started out a handful of NET spots above us and still are. I don't expect a team to drop a full line over 1 loss any more than UT fans having been angry over us dropping to a 4 seed had we lost to Miss St in the opener...these teams have played 30+ games and seeding are mostly already set. Unless you started out on the brink of moving up. We started out closer to a 4-seed than a 2. I think we'll do very well to reach the 2-line. Jmo but I think we now deserve it. But a 1 or a top 2 seed no haha.
We have no Q2 or lower losses, KY has 1 Q2 loss. We have the same amount of losses as them, and the same number of Q1 wins as them. Explain why they should be above us.
 
We have no Q2 or lower losses, KY has 1 Q2 loss. We have the same amount of losses as them, and the same number of Q1 wins as them. Explain why they should be above us.

It’s annoying, but he’s probably spot on regarding how the committee looks at it. But Weezer’s right, it’s a lazy, horse s**t way of differentiating between teams that have such a similar schedule and resume.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top