Bassmaster_Vol
June=#LifeMonth
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
- Messages
- 54,656
- Likes
- 230,936
SS, nobody is being negative. I was just pointing out that Burns proved to not be a great hire so any of this "just trust the coaches!" stuff is irrelevant. The only complaint that I am making is that I would prefer it to be someone with experience. I don't think that's some extreme take.You laugh, but it seems that many prefer that answer. I just prefer to look for the best and remain positive until it's clear that's misplaced.
It could have been something that simple. Maybe DJ doesn't mesh with this offense? That's fine if so. Seems like we could have found someone more proven is all.I'm also not too sure how much I trust AP and VQ.
I think the heat could have been turned down on DJ while administration things happen or maybe he reached out to us and Heupel just didn't feel like it was a great fit once meeting him.
It could have been something that simple. Maybe DJ doesn't mesh with this offense? That's fine if so. Seems like we could have found someone more proven is all.
oh i think you're an an expert at receiver... all things catcher.Again, you can say I'm no expert at the receiver position. And you'd be right. But Swain is. And he threw a party when he left. By every report I've heard from people I know and from Austin Price, he was terrible at recruiting. We have a chance to upgrade here. Is Pope an upgrade? Maybe. Who knows? My preference would have been to hire someone proven. Shoot me.
My counter to this would be that he's at TN now. Not UCF. At TN he put up one of the best offenses in college football. Hiring a proven coach here could have been done. But at the end of the day, it's his choice and if he thinks Pope can get it done then let's see it. Seems unnecessarily risky thoTo be fair though, if you look at Heupel's hiring history for offense how many times has he gone out and hired a proven name. I mean even Burns wasn't exactly proven.
SS, nobody is being negative. I was just pointing out that Burns proved to not be a great hire so any of this "just trust the coaches!" stuff is irrelevant. The only complaint that I am making is that I would prefer it to be someone with experience. I don't think that's some extreme take.
Calm down Adolf, you're about to be Putin your place.
This is certainly true.I agree with how you phrased this. Cause I don't think Burns was bad here, but he definitely wasn't a great hire. On paper he had plenty of speed/talent in that WR room too and to only see the upperclassmen really take strides has you wondering.
Swain and AP both are the worst for turning on anyone that leaves (except Tee for some odd reason...) but typically they don't think we've ever lost a good coach and always think we can upgrade.
My counter to this would be that he's at TN now. Not UCF. At TN he put up one of the best offenses in college football. Hiring a proven coach here could have been done. But at the end of the day, it's his choice and if he thinks Pope can get it done then let's see it. Seems unnecessarily risky tho
To be fair though, if you look at Heupel's hiring history for offense how many times has he gone out and hired a proven name. I mean even Burns wasn't exactly proven.
if you said that about the political stuff id agree.
this is a sports message board. if you dont like him, block him. That's what ive done for @InVOLuntary, @Weezer, @engineerVOL, and @Glitch. Those idgits summitted Mt Moran more times that I can count.
@LA Vol I know you been around a while. Can you briefly describe the difference between this staff and the last staff, as far as how they go about hiring coaches. Also how do you feel about the way this staff goes about recruiting opposed to the last one.. I will hang up an listenPope and CJH are filling in for Burns and recruiting isn't skipping a beat. Burns leaving was no surprise, UT didn't attempt to retain him and worked a very short list to replace him. Fit, recruiting and keeping the culture are more important than timing.
