I think Vrabel just got greedy there. I don’t actually know what the “analytics” say on it, but going for it on 4th and goal from the 1 is a much more justified risk than going for 2 from the 1 — the reward is 4 additional points, whereas Vrabel was chasing 1 additional point. Moreover, situationally, I just don’t understand the call at all. You have the chance to take the lead with a PAT, and while you’d rather have a 2-point lead, all else equal, it doesn’t really do that much for you to be up 2 instead of 1.
That being said, the Titans had three crucial plays where they needed one yard and got stuffed with the most dominant back in the game, so it is on execution also.