Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#114,076
#114,076
hog88 said:
As of now all are asymptomatic to mild symptoms. One of the girls in the office got it from her husband who was in Vegas last week and the other one got it from her daughter who does something in health care. No idea where my drivers got it from.
Click to expand...
If you have to ask with the drivers, it's better not to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weezy and hog88
#114,077
#114,077
Orangeslice13 said:
You’re the OG name caller.
Your stupid ****ing question was answered in the post you quoted without reading. I even included my thoughts to prevent stupidity. Congratulations.
Click to expand...
Why don't you put me on ignore? You apparently don't want to engage me other than to tighten your panties, so ignore my posts
 
#114,079
#114,079
hog88 said:
As of now all are asymptomatic to mild symptoms. One of the girls in the office got it from her husband who was in Vegas last week and the other one got it from her daughter who does something in health care. No idea where my drivers got it from.
Click to expand...

Everyone needs to accept they are going to get COVID. The options on the table are:

1 - get the regimen of shots and boosters. Hope that the jabs do it’s thing to keep symptoms to a minimum. And pray that some longer term negative vaccine consequences don’t materialize.

2 - evaluate your own risk with respect to health and medical history and take your chances in the COVID casino

The knows here are:
- relative risk of COVID disease
- jabs are minimizing risk of death in hospitalized COVID patients

The unknown is:
- long term effect of vaccine and associated boosters

It’s such a simple choice that is it perplexing how complicated the discussion has become, largely due to intermingling politics into the decision.

The facts just need to be laid on the table. Each individual makes their own choice. And we go about life as normal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HammondB3Vol, jaybird_1981, Rasputin_Vol and 6 others
#114,080
#114,080
LouderVol said:
Opposite at my work. 2 unvaxxed no symptoms, 10 vaxxed all with mild symptoms. Granted that is 100% of the (known) unvaxxed in my office, and a little more than 1/3 of the vaxxed.

Covid has been weird from day 1, and will continue to be. Protect yourself how you see fit, but with the uncertainty, mandates have never made sense.

It's been humorous watching people's reactions in the office. At first it was very much a high and mighty that the unvaxxed got it. Then denial when the first vaxxed got it, somewhere around the 5th vaxxed it turned into panic, then the biggest branchcovidian got it, that turned it up to some sort of manic reinterpretation (the unvaxxed couldnt have had no symptoms, the only the reason I am not in the hospital is the vax), and now we finally hit acceptance.

Really interesting case study going from watching it hit society to watching it hit those I spend the most time with. Eye opening in how its changed people. Not for the better.
Click to expand...
At my work there hasn’t been any disagreement between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Nobody really cares, or has been vocal about it at least, whether anyone else gets the shot. It’s been viewed as a personal choice thing.

Although some of the vaccinated folks are mad they still have to put on a mask if they leave their computer and walk to the bathroom, break room, etc. A few folks hated masks so much that was the reason they got the shot to begin with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 508mikey, ***RoadVol*** and Rasputin_Vol
#114,084
#114,084
DC_Vol said:
Everyone needs to accept they are going to get COVID. The options on the table are:

1 - get the regimen of shots and boosters. Hope that the jabs do it’s thing to keep symptoms to a minimum. And pray that some longer term negative vaccine consequences don’t materialize.

2 - evaluate your own risk with respect to health and medical history and take your chances in the COVID casino

The knows here are:
- relative risk of COVID disease
- jabs are minimizing risk of death in hospitalized COVID patients

The unknown is:
- long term effect of vaccine and associated boosters

It’s such a simple choice that is it perplexing how complicated the discussion has become, largely due to intermingling politics into the decision.

The facts just need to be laid on the table. Each individual makes their own choice. And we go about life as normal.
Click to expand...



I believe you are correct in some areas, but I disagree with you on a few items.

First off, we all need to stop calling it a vaccine. It is not. The CDC had to change the definition of a vaccine because this shot didn't meet the criteria of a vaccine.

Secondly, we have no idea if the "vaccine" is really helping anyone at all. Since the CDC is not collecting and sharing the comorbidities associated with each death, there is no way to know how effective this shot is at all. Maybe the ones "vaccinated" do not have 3-4 comorbidities whereas the ones that have died may have most likely died had they contracted the flu or any other respiratory virus regardless of their "vaccine" status.

Third, with 90%+ deaths coming from people over the age of 50% there is no reason at that children should take this shot. The risks far outweigh the benefits unless the child is immunocompromised.

You are absolutely correct in stating this has become political. It has been since it started. Remember the Democrat philosophy, never let a good crisis go to waste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HammondB3Vol, kiddiedoc, DynaLo and 2 others
#114,085
#114,085
TheDeeble said:
At my work there hasn’t been any disagreement between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Nobody really cares, or has been vocal about it at least, whether anyone else gets the shot. It’s been viewed as a personal choice thing.

Although some of the vaccinated folks are mad they still have to put on a mask if they leave their computer and walk to the bathroom, break room, etc. A few folks hated masks so much that was the reason they got the shot to begin with.
Click to expand...
It became a thing at my office when the CDC introduced different rules based on vaccine status rather than safety. If everyone was vaxxed they wouldnt have to wear a mask.
 
#114,087
#114,087
825VOL said:
I believe you are correct in some areas, but I disagree with you on a few items.

First off, we all need to stop calling it a vaccine. It is not. The CDC had to change the definition of a vaccine because this shot didn't meet the criteria of a vaccine.

Secondly, we have no idea if the "vaccine" is really helping anyone at all. Since the CDC is not collecting and sharing the comorbidities associated with each death, there is no way to know how effective this shot is at all. Maybe the ones "vaccinated" do not have 3-4 comorbidities whereas the ones that have died may have most likely died had they contracted the flu or any other respiratory virus regardless of their "vaccine" status.

Third, with 90%+ deaths coming from people over the age of 50% there is no reason at that children should take this shot. The risks far outweigh the benefits unless the child is immunocompromised.

You are absolutely correct in stating this has become political. It has been since it started. Remember the Democrat philosophy, never let a good crisis go to waste.
Click to expand...
The annoying part for me is that arent even trying to hide that they use slanted data. They do it in the open with the knowledge that the media will never call them out on it. And then they change metrics whenever the previous one no longer fits the narrative, and they call it science, rather than politicking.
 
#114,089
#114,089
hog88 said:
As of now all are asymptomatic to mild symptoms. One of the girls in the office got it from her husband who was in Vegas last week and the other one got it from her daughter who does something in health care. No idea where my drivers got it from.
Click to expand...
Interesting... I wonder what else he caught in Vegas? Or may have left behind?
 
#114,091
#114,091
825VOL said:
I believe you are correct in some areas, but I disagree with you on a few items.

First off, we all need to stop calling it a vaccine. It is not. The CDC had to change the definition of a vaccine because this shot didn't meet the criteria of a vaccine.

Secondly, we have no idea if the "vaccine" is really helping anyone at all. Since the CDC is not collecting and sharing the comorbidities associated with each death, there is no way to know how effective this shot is at all. Maybe the ones "vaccinated" do not have 3-4 comorbidities whereas the ones that have died may have most likely died had they contracted the flu or any other respiratory virus regardless of their "vaccine" status.

Third, with 90%+ deaths coming from people over the age of 50% there is no reason at that children should take this shot. The risks far outweigh the benefits unless the child is immunocompromised.

You are absolutely correct in stating this has become political. It has been since it started. Remember the Democrat philosophy, never let a good crisis go to waste.
Click to expand...
It is, at best, a therapeutic injection or something that minimizes symptoms... not a true vaccine (at least the definition of vaccine before they changed it).
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiddiedoc, DynaLo, Ernest T. Vol and 1 other person
#114,092
#114,092
hog88 said:
5 out today, 2 office both vaxxed and 3 drivers 2 of which I know are vaxxed the other IDK. 1 of the drivers along with being vaxxed (IDK about boosted) survived a bad bout of Covid in spring 2020 vented and hospitalized for about a month.
Click to expand...

I don't know anyone who had to be vented that made it through. Let us know how they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#114,093
#114,093
Grand Vol said:
I'm pretty sure the last time the French displayed such a flippant attitude towards their citizens, the leadership started getting gravity haircuts from that unique French device.
Click to expand...

This time the peasants are well armed, roughly estimated at 1 in 6, and since doing away with mandatory military service there is no longer the sense of loyalty to government it fostered. I won’t be the least bit surprised if the sentiments behind “Madame” start reappearing. The French have always loved a good revolt.
 
#114,095
#114,095
DynaLo said:
I just don’t see “show us your papers” being very popular now in a population whose parents and grandparents were directly and violently impacted by that very same rule during the 1940’s.
Click to expand...
Yeah well unfortunately the majority of Frenchmen with guts all died during that (and the preceding) event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
#114,098
#114,098
SpaceCoastVol said:
witty

For some strange reason, you don't see that you and I actually agree on a lot of stuff. But apparently I said something once that pizzed you off, and you can't get past it. Oh well.

Your loss.
Click to expand...
I don’t know you from atom. I don’t quote you very often. I just responded to you. Any issues you’ve had are your own.
Tell ya what, stop saying stupid things, like asking questions, that were answered in the post you quoted, and I’ll stop pointing out that it was stupid.
Savvy?
 
#114,099
#114,099
ButchPlz said:
Yeah well unfortunately the majority of Frenchmen with guts all died during that (and the preceding) event.
Click to expand...

But the women didn’t and they raised the children in the aftermath. Remember also that women were very heavily involved in the French Revolution and its outcome. Disregard the wrath of a pissed off Frenchwoman at your own peril.😁
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top