He_Made_It
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,230
- Likes
- 1,501
Game is a blur honestly but didn’t Hooker have an open man twice at end of game. Absolutely agree we could’ve probably got into Fg range easier and managed time better.WTF on the play calling the last minute of regulation! WTF on #4 on D! WTF on these pathetic diprefs!!!!
Very well said. No matter how we got to that last 4th down in OT, the officials' call was still wrong, and ultimately was the final deciding factor for our offense.Tennessee lost because of a combination of all of the above (except "Music City Bowl bad mojo"...that was funny, though). One play never defines a game. However, people who say "one play never defines a game," in the context of another person complaining about a bad call are either missing the point or just throwing up a red herring. If I complain about a bad call after the game, and someone responds with "Well, you can't blame the loss on one call when they had lots of opportunities to win the game," that is fallacious thinking. It is an example of "whataboutism." It is avoiding the topic at hand by raising a different topic. Complaining about a call and pointing out blown opportunities are two different topics. Bringing up other plays is merely a distraction towards the bad call. It should be acknowledged that the call was blown and it was devastating towards Tennessee's odds to win the game at that particular time. What happened before the call is irrelevant to how bad the call was. It was an atrocious call, one of the worst I have ever seen as a UT fan.
Tennessee lost because of a combination of all of the above (except "Music City Bowl bad mojo"...that was funny, though). One play never defines a game. However, people who say "one play never defines a game," in the context of another person complaining about a bad call are either missing the point or just throwing up a red herring. If I complain about a bad call after the game, and someone responds with "Well, you can't blame the loss on one call when they had lots of opportunities to win the game," that is fallacious thinking. It is an example of "whataboutism." It is avoiding the topic at hand by raising a different topic. Complaining about a call and pointing out blown opportunities are two different topics. Bringing up other plays is merely a distraction towards the bad call. It should be acknowledged that the call was blown and it was devastating towards Tennessee's odds to win the game at that particular time. What happened before the call is irrelevant to how bad the call was. It was an atrocious call, one of the worst I have ever seen as a UT fan.
Agree. Whataboutism is also known as "straw man" arguments. Rather than counter the argument in question, the person props up a "straw man" to knock over, trying to look like they have won the argument.Tennessee lost because of a combination of all of the above (except "Music City Bowl bad mojo"...that was funny, though). One play never defines a game. However, people who say "one play never defines a game," in the context of another person complaining about a bad call are either missing the point or just throwing up a red herring. If I complain about a bad call after the game, and someone responds with "Well, you can't blame the loss on one call when they had lots of opportunities to win the game," that is fallacious thinking. It is an example of "whataboutism." It is avoiding the topic at hand by raising a different topic. Complaining about a call and pointing out blown opportunities are two different topics. Bringing up other plays is merely a distraction towards the bad call. It should be acknowledged that the call was blown and it was devastating towards Tennessee's odds to win the game at that particular time. What happened before the call is irrelevant to how bad the call was. It was an atrocious call, one of the worst I have ever seen as a UT fan.
It's all the above; but the play calling and clock management at the end of regulation was mind-boggling.
Either Wright scores or Fant gets flagged for pulling then Huepel definitely kicks a FG at 4th and goal from the 8.Huepel needs to learn the value of a field goal once in a while instead of 4th and out
If hooker is accurate or the refs call PI it's a TD or makeable FG and we're celebrating.It's all the above; but the play calling and clock management at the end of regulation was mind-boggling.