Recruiting Forum Football Talk IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
#35,478
#35,478
jakez4ut said:
Well the NFL refs aren't any better. What a ish show this has been.

Seattle wr catches, runs, fumbled, Seattle recovers... No time outs... Had to rush to line up and spike it, clock hours zero...

Refs stop the game to review whether or not it was a complete pass. Puts 2 seconds back on the clock. Seattle kicks game tieing FG.

View attachment 404006
Click to expand...
They replayed it and the spike was actually at the 1 second mark.(before review was initiated)

On top of that I thought the officiating was great. They stopped it for review at the 3 second mark and allowed them to get their spike in that they originally spiked at the 1 second mark to then be at the 2 second mark.

I’m not a fan of either team and I think the officials did a great job on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beneVOLence and jave36
#35,479
#35,479
VolGee4 said:
I think I said last night…we played a walk on tackle and Ollie Lane, Whitehead and a walk on RB at times, Solon Page, and then being led by a senior transfer QB his team didn’t want v…who will probably be the #1 pick taken in April.

The other ironic thing is that Kiffin (I think more than once) said postgame that they were missing 4 players on offense and won. Heupel didn’t get any air time, but my guess is he would have never said anything about guys being out.
Click to expand...
The Dallas Cowboys OL is hella good…and basically triples the amount of false starts our young upstarts commit. That’s coaching!
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX, VOLSONLY, VolGee4 and 3 others
#35,482
#35,482
cHiZzLeVOL said:
They replayed it and the spike was actually at the 1 second mark.(before review was initiated)

On top of that I thought the officiating was great. They stopped it for review at the 3 second mark and allowed them to get their spike in that they originally spiked at the 1 second mark to then be at the 2 second mark.

I’m not a fan of either team and I think the officials did a great job on that.
Click to expand...
They didn't stop it till the trans were walking out on the field.. There definitely wasn't 3 seconds left when they were trying to clock it. Maybe 1... Either way...there was no reason to review that play at all... None. That's the bigger issue. They should never have stopped play, period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy Antrim
#35,487
#35,487
jakez4ut said:
They didn't stop it till the trans were walking out on the field.. There definitely wasn't 3 seconds left when they were trying to clock it. Maybe 1... Either way...there was no reason to review that play at all... None. That's the bigger issue. They should never have stopped play, period.
Click to expand...

I agree they shouldn’t have reviewed up.
how about this rule change...

when the clock is running and there is a threat to half ending let the offense attempt to get off the play. After that play is completed review the previous play and adjust if need be


No team should benefit from a stoppage of play for a replay imo
 
#35,489
#35,489
jakez4ut said:
They didn't stop it till the trans were walking out on the field.. There definitely wasn't 3 seconds left when they were trying to clock it. Maybe 1... Either way...there was no reason to review that play at all... None. That's the bigger issue. They should never have stopped play, period.
Click to expand...

They reviewed it to make sure he didn’t step out of bounds.

Even if they did not stop play at 3 seconds he had spiked the ball with 1 second on the game clock.

So, it doesn’t matter….. you are getting upset over a 1 second difference that would have resulted in the same outcome.

The refs did a great job. Period. Your argument is dumb.
 
#35,490
#35,490
BruinVol said:
I agree they shouldn’t have reviewed up.
how about this rule change...

when the clock is running and there is a threat to half ending let the offense attempt to get off the play. After that play is completed review the previous play and adjust if need be


No team should benefit from a stoppage of play for a replay imo
Click to expand...
The ball was clocked (before review initiated) with 1 second still on the clock….. I don’t get what the fuss is about…. They would have still been able to kick a field goal.

Instead they got 3 seconds to snap the ball and possibly go offsides and the clock run out on its own. If anything that would have screwed them. But instead they got 1 extra second that didn’t matter. Because the outcome would of been the same…. A field goal attempt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beneVOLence and Tennessee Golfer
#35,494
#35,494
cHiZzLeVOL said:
The ball was clocked (before review initiated) with 1 second still on the clock….. I don’t get what the fuss is about…. They would have still been able to kick a field goal.

Instead they got 3 seconds to snap the ball and possibly go offsides and the clock run out on its own. If anything that would have screwed them. But instead they got 1 extra second that didn’t matter. Because the outcome would of been the same…. A field goal attempt.
Click to expand...

The clock ran out. Getting that second back would have required a review but yea likely they get it
 
#35,495
#35,495
cHiZzLeVOL said:
They reviewed it to make sure he didn’t step out of bounds.

Even if they did not stop play at 3 seconds he had spiked the ball with 1 second on the game clock.

So, it doesn’t matter….. you are getting upset over a 1 second difference that would have resulted in the same outcome.

The refs did a great job. Period. Your argument is dumb.
Click to expand...
Bull. There was no reason to stop that play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy Antrim
#35,498
#35,498
cHiZzLeVOL said:
Hope we find an answer for someone other than Dayne Davis at Right Tackle. We will get destroyed at the line of scrimmage if he is the Right Tackle against Alabama.

Didn’t we pick up a OL transfer that hasn’t played?
Click to expand...

I don’t remember us picking up an OL transfer. Doesn’t mean we didn’t. I mean let’s be honest, the only way we would have a shot at compete if with Bama is if everyone was healthy. But think about what you said. We played Davis and right tackle and we had Ollie Lane in there as well. We even played Lampley. Yet we still only lost by 5 points and still had a chance to win the game. Also factor in we were without Evans.

I am very excited for this team moving forward. If we continue to progress, I do t think it’s completely out of the realm of possibility that we could seriously compete for the East next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrVolton, SmokinBob and screenthis
#35,499
#35,499
BruinVol said:
Have to wonder if that play alone makes JH go to Bailey soon
Click to expand...

Without best OL probably not but it would be nice. I thought it was neat that when Hooker was hurt Bailey ran out on the field to check on him. That to me spoke volumes to the relationship/respect between the two. Obviously Milton didn’t have that option since he was with offensive huddle and coaches being talked to but Bailey did not have to run out there and he did
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX, Smokeytom, VolNash17 and 9 others
#35,500
#35,500
BigOrangeTrain said:
I don’t remember us picking up an OL transfer. Doesn’t mean we didn’t. I mean let’s be honest, the only way we would have a shot at compete if with Bama is if everyone was healthy. But think about what you said. We played Davis and right tackle and we had Ollie Lane in there as well. We even played Lampley. Yet we still only lost by 5 points and still had a chance to win the game. Also factor in we were without Evans.

I am very excited for this team moving forward. If we continue to progress, I do t think it’s completely out of the realm of possibility that we could seriously compete for the East next year.
Click to expand...
You are correct regarding the OL transfer don’t know why I thought we got one lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top