luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 48,018
- Likes
- 20,713
How those reasonable and rational approaches are applied and implemented are the key. We have a founding document which is amendable. But we don't follow that pathway when we want to integrate something reasonable and rational. Our reasonable and rational ideas are too important, too necessary, too sacrosanct to be exposed to the risk of stumbling and falling on the existing pathway. Therefore, in our hubris we find new and creative ways to circumvent the pathway which was created for a constantly evolving world.The only thing that will work is a reasonable and rational approach.
The Republican Party has probably been worse than the Democratic Party but this a shiniest turd in the box comparison.Agree. But let's make sure we are honest about who favors the fencing. Liberals love big government. So do republicans. I know we don't like to think that way. But if anyone wants proof start a thread about cutting the spending budget across the board. The sacred cows people are milking on the other side of the fence, belong to both parties.
If there is a person at the state or federal level who legitimately represents me, my views, and the things i think are important, I have yet to find them. And hey, I get it. No candidate can represent one person at the exclusion of everyone else. Compromise under a big tent is part of the arrangement. But I gave up voting for the shiniest turd several elections ago.The Republican Party has probably been worse than the Democratic Party but this a shiniest turd in the box comparison.
i don't agree with Lightfoot's racist policy. But, correct if i am wrong here, I think she is prioritizing interviews to pocs. I don't think she is only granting interviews to the more melaninated.If the black mayor of a major city has a policy of only giving interviews to brown or black reporters and refuses to give interviews to white reporters, where does that fall on your racist continuum?
I think it's somewhat accurate. It sometimes seems to me that the US thrives not because of decisions made today, but because of what previous generations did and we're slowly undoing everything that helped make the US so desirable.I think you're kind of referencing something along these lines with "good times" being prosperous.
View attachment 369466
I think an argument could be made that we're somewhere in phase 3 sliding towards 4.
I think that's correct, we are at the event horizon between 3 and 4.I think you're kind of referencing something along these lines with "good times" being prosperous.
View attachment 369466
I think an argument could be made that we're somewhere in phase 3 sliding towards 4.