SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 56,260
- Likes
- 70,437
It’s really not a radical decision. I know they’re talking about changing it, but even Tennessee has had restrictions on going armed in public since the 80’s. It’s never been overturned by a court and Tennessee courts have applied it in a pretty draconian way.
There just has never been a widely recognized constitutional right to open carry. The decision is in line with moderate jurisprudence.
I thought it also covers concealed carry so it's hard to exercise the right if you can only do it in your home.
The federal ban on bump stocks, put in place by the Trump administration, was ruled unlawful by a divided federal appeals court on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. This is a significant win for gun owners who have observed overreaching government clamp down on guns in recent years.
The latest ruling from the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals grants Gun Owners of America (GOA), a preliminary injunction against the ban, affirming the gun group's concerns that the federal ban violated the "Administrative Procedure Act, the Fifth Amendment's takings clause, and the 14th Amendment's right to due process."
... and we wonder what the National Rifle Association will have to say about this ruling after they caved and called for "additional regulations" on "bump fire stocks" in late 2017 following the Las Vegas shooting.
I swear I’d enjoy slapping the bloody hell out of the kinds of a-holes that pens articles like this one.We need common sense leftist control.
View attachment 358749
Nope. Not until they stop focusing on the implement and start focusing on the individual.This comes up every time there is a mass shooting in the US. Lots of talk, the House might pass a bill, it will die in the Senate. Repeat next mass shooting. Anybody thinking this time will be any different needs to pass the blunt, they holding it too long.
