Something to know if not already posted, Sam Bradford was a 5.7 3-star quarterback according to Rivals (2006) and Landry Jones was a 5.8 4-star also according to rivals (2008). 247 also had Bradford as a 3-star and Jones as a 4-star. I think Bradford was much more mobile than Jones. I’d compare Bailey to Jones and maybe Salter and Maurer to Bradford. jmo.
Yesterday I had a post that showed we should forget about the Time of Possession stat in regards to our new approach to football at Tennessee. Heupel’s offenses will typically have the ball for between 22 and 24 minutes per game which means our defense will be on the field for around 36-38 minutes per game. I said it was probably more important to look at how many snaps the defense was playing rather than the clock time they were on the field. I suspect our media may not point this out and will instead mislead some of our lesser informed fans with the notion that we are getting killed in TOP. They’ll probably save this nugget for when we lose so they can get everyone riled up. I don’t even know if we can count on the radio guys to be informed about this. I figure it’s up to you and me and the quarterbacks on the Big Orange Hotline to spread the word. jmo.
In 2013 against Oregon we had the ball for 34:18 and the Ducks had it for 25:42. We got beat 59-14. We ran 67 plays; they ran 76. Time is irrelevant. jmo.
Anyway, so looking at Heupel’s history and weighting it more for his time at UCF I think we can expect our defense to play an addition 10-12 snaps per game above and beyond what we have been accustomed to. Now the fast paced offense isn’t always the cause of the defense having to play more snaps. If they can’t get off the field then that is on them. We will need to have enough depth so that we can manage the snap counts for our guys on that side of the ball, and they’ll need to be in top condition, else wise we may end up losing a lot of 4th quarter games. jmo.
So here’s a couple of data tables that hopefully paints a somewhat better picture of this. DE stands for defensive efficiency. It’s a ranking so a lower number is better. If we suck at defensive efficiency, which we often have, it means we can’t get off the field and our opponents are probably going to score a lot of points. As you can see in the comparison of scoring offense to scoring defense, Heupel usually has a good defense to work with and some of the margins he creates is likely going to put us in games that nobody thinks we have any business being in, that is, providing our defense holds up. jmo.
View attachment 355679
View attachment 355680