SmokinBob
(â) Team chargervol
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
- Messages
- 9,294
- Likes
- 32,794
Bias is a human flaw, shared by all humans. On that point youâre right. Unfortunately, racism is something that goes far beyond simple bias. Racism involves the fear of lossâ loss of control, loss of power, loss of wealth, loss of an established systemic order. It has been proven again and again that our very basic systems still remain very racist. There is white justice and black justice. There is black opportunity and white opportunity. These matters are statistically true. You donât need to agree for them to be true. They are just facts. The chance of being unjustly arrested, unjustly charged, unjustly put to death are all higher for black people. The opportunities for many jobs are starkly different for black and white people. Compensation is different, promotions are different, rates of being promoted are different. Again, itâs not important to agree with these things because they are just facts. Anecdotal stories, of a person who runs counter to the statistics doesnât change those realities. We are a long way from equality of opportunity. I wish that werenât true, but it is. The myth of âhire the bestâ imagines a myth where there are two choices: a single qualified white candidate and a single unqualified black one. That is almost never the case. The truth is that there are usually many (very) qualified candidates. Itâs insulting to the hard work of those considered to pretend otherwise. The myth of the superior white candidate who was passed over is a story told to stir people up. Iâm impressed that this group is carrying on a civil debate about this topic. Iâve resisted participation because itâs a strange forum for the topic. That said, we canât ignore that undoing slavery, reconstruction, Jim Crow and lynching is going to take some time. That doesnât mean I judge those who disagree with me here as âbadâ. I just canât sit on the sideline without noting that there is a lot more work to be done. That work comes in the form of doing the extra work of finding excellence in places we normally donât look. Itâs a cheap shot to pretend like that equates to hiring lesser candidates or lesser people. That is rarely the problem.
I look back at our previous coaching staffs:I donât have any answers for you brother.
one difference could be Saban has had 3 former minority coordinators end up with head coaching jobs and two other minority RB coaches get head coaching jobs as well.
not really sure but thereâs a disconnect and I donât know when it happened but itâs there.
Throwing out human nature and prejudices, there are many things that can make it "problematic", such as 'real world' variables that every hiring body has to deal with. Every situation is different, add to that, things like sample pool size, potential candidates willingness, time constraints, strategic fit, etc. make a "perfect" hire extremely difficult, if not impossible.With due respect to you and your opinion, saying it twice doesnât make it anymore true. The concept of diversity has nothing to do with hiring an unqualified black candidate over a white one. Thatâs just a bogeyman that isnât there. Itâs a story thatâs made up to make people angry, and it works. It just also happens to be false. The pursuit of diversity is based on the notion that we should seek proportional representation among equally qualified candidates. That shouldnât be problematic.
You made my eyes leak a little - you speak my heart.Iâm just so sick of the division in this world man.
I donât care who you are, what you look like, if your skin is slightly darker than mine, etc..Iâm still gonna love you & Iâd do anything I possibly could to help out anybody on this site.
Weâre never all going to agree on everything, & we may fight like brothers & sisters, but we can still all love each other. We all want the University of Tennessee to succeed & finally be a national power in football again. The things we disagree on are literally so minuscule in the grand scheme of life it doesnât even deserve a wasted breath.
Are you saying that all white men have received preferential treatment for centuries? How can anyone think this? I am genuinely curious. I'll just take for instance my Scotch/Irish ancestors that were sharecroppers to their British overlords until they managed to come to America and work hard as very poor farmers. They didn't own slaves. They weren't given anything. This does not include all the instances of actual white slaves in European history. White males never got the bad end of the shaft? Do you know about the Irish and Italian immigrants?.... This does not take away from what black people suffered during slavery or Jim Crow. Just saying you painted that with a broad brush.Playing devil's advocate a little here, but white people, mostly men, have received preferential treatment for centuries, if not mellinnia. I'm not justifying hiring someone because they're a minority, I'm just saying white males have almost never gotten the bad end of the shaft, period. It really has been a ridiculous run.
Playing devil's advocate a little here, but white people, mostly men, have received preferential treatment for centuries, if not mellinnia. I'm not justifying hiring someone because they're a minority, I'm just saying white males have almost never gotten the bad end of the shaft, period. It really has been a ridiculous run.
Bias is a human flaw, shared by all humans. On that point youâre right. Unfortunately, racism is something that goes far beyond simple bias. Racism involves the fear of lossâ loss of control, loss of power, loss of wealth, loss of an established systemic order. It has been proven again and again that our very basic systems still remain very racist. There is white justice and black justice. There is black opportunity and white opportunity. These matters are statistically true. You donât need to agree for them to be true. They are just facts. The chance of being unjustly arrested, unjustly charged, unjustly put to death are all higher for black people. The opportunities for many jobs are starkly different for black and white people. Compensation is different, promotions are different, rates of being promoted are different. Again, itâs not important to agree with these things because they are just facts. Anecdotal stories, of a person who runs counter to the statistics doesnât change those realities. We are a long way from equality of opportunity. I wish that werenât true, but it is. The myth of âhire the bestâ imagines a myth where there are two choices: a single qualified white candidate and a single unqualified black one. That is almost never the case. The truth is that there are usually many (very) qualified candidates. Itâs insulting to the hard work of those considered to pretend otherwise. The myth of the superior white candidate who was passed over is a story told to stir people up. Iâm impressed that this group is carrying on a civil debate about this topic. Iâve resisted participation because itâs a strange forum for the topic. That said, we canât ignore that undoing slavery, reconstruction, Jim Crow and lynching is going to take some time. That doesnât mean I judge those who disagree with me here as âbadâ. I just canât sit on the sideline without noting that there is a lot more work to be done. That work comes in the form of doing the extra work of finding excellence in places we normally donât look. Itâs a cheap shot to pretend like that equates to hiring lesser candidates or lesser people. That is rarely the problem.
Playing devil's advocate a little here, but white people, mostly men, have received preferential treatment for centuries, if not mellinnia. I'm not justifying hiring someone because they're a minority, I'm just saying white males have almost never gotten the bad end of the shaft, period. It really has been a ridiculous run.
With due respect to you and your opinion, saying it twice doesnât make it anymore true. The concept of diversity has nothing to do with hiring an unqualified black candidate over a white one. Thatâs just a bogeyman that isnât there. Itâs a story thatâs made up to make people angry, and it works. It just also happens to be false. The pursuit of diversity is based on the notion that we should seek proportional representation among equally qualified candidates. That shouldnât be problematic.
The biggest difference is Saban has had success and is winning which then reflects well on his staff, regardless of race. UT has not had that success. Dooley and Pruitt aren't even head coaches anymore, and Butch spent a few years as an intern for Saban before finally getting a HC job this year. Success breeds opportunity and we've not had that success in a very long time.I donât have any answers for you brother.
one difference could be Saban has had 3 former minority coordinators end up with head coaching jobs and two other minority RB coaches get head coaching jobs as well.
not really sure but thereâs a disconnect and I donât know when it happened but itâs there.
Dumb af because it had nothing to do with skin color, historically. White people were just as enslaved. The Roman's alone show that vigorously. The Irish and Scots by the British. The Mongols, Persians, etc enslaved white people. The notion they received better treatment as a whole is disingenuous and I haven't even mentioned the Jews. Slavery was simply classed based by the conqueror. Back then we were tribal, not global which explains the above examples and even the early years of America.Playing devil's advocate a little here, but white people, mostly men, have received preferential treatment for centuries, if not mellinnia. I'm not justifying hiring someone because they're a minority, I'm just saying white males have almost never gotten the bad end of the shaft, period. It really has been a ridiculous run.
This is incredibly false.Yes. This is true. There are also different types of burns. There are burns that sting. Some that leave a scar and others than require you to amputate a limb. What racism has done to black people in America in particular is far worse than the vast majority of any type oppression that white people have experienced throughout history. The same white Americans who came here and massacred native Americans to get away from their oppression. As an adult, itâs irresponsible to create a false equivalent as a means to dilute the impact of racism on the black community. Racism is really bad guys. Racism allowed the Tulsa massacre to happen and nobody even bat an eye. Racism is why the FBI never declared the KKK as a terrorist organization but spared no expense to destroy the black panther party. I know a lot of you guys are conservative and such but please rethink your views.
being conservative has nothing to do with this. Youâre view about that IS the problem. Statistically look at oppression in liberal cities and states. Itâs astronomical the differences to conservative ones. (I know I know, political forum, but donât be ignorant)Yes. This is true. There are also different types of burns. There are burns that sting. Some that leave a scar and others than require you to amputate a limb. What racism has done to black people in America in particular is far worse than the vast majority of any type oppression that white people have experienced throughout history. The same white Americans who came here and massacred native Americans to get away from their oppression. As an adult, itâs irresponsible to create a false equivalent as a means to dilute the impact of racism on the black community. Racism is really bad guys. Racism allowed the Tulsa massacre to happen and nobody even bat an eye. Racism is why the FBI never declared the KKK as a terrorist organization but spared no expense to destroy the black panther party. I know a lot of you guys are conservative and such but please rethink your views.
I have been told by HR of a company that I have worked for, that if I'm ever up for a "promotion" they would have to make sure they have there percentages of diversity hires before they could award my hard work with the promotion.Bias is a human flaw, shared by all humans. On that point youâre right. Unfortunately, racism is something that goes far beyond simple bias. Racism involves the fear of lossâ loss of control, loss of power, loss of wealth, loss of an established systemic order. It has been proven again and again that our very basic systems still remain very racist. There is white justice and black justice. There is black opportunity and white opportunity. These matters are statistically true. You donât need to agree for them to be true. They are just facts. The chance of being unjustly arrested, unjustly charged, unjustly put to death are all higher for black people. The opportunities for many jobs are starkly different for black and white people. Compensation is different, promotions are different, rates of being promoted are different. Again, itâs not important to agree with these things because they are just facts. Anecdotal stories, of a person who runs counter to the statistics doesnât change those realities. We are a long way from equality of opportunity. I wish that werenât true, but it is. The myth of âhire the bestâ imagines a myth where there are two choices: a single qualified white candidate and a single unqualified black one. That is almost never the case. The truth is that there are usually many (very) qualified candidates. Itâs insulting to the hard work of those considered to pretend otherwise. The myth of the superior white candidate who was passed over is a story told to stir people up. Iâm impressed that this group is carrying on a civil debate about this topic. Iâve resisted participation because itâs a strange forum for the topic. That said, we canât ignore that undoing slavery, reconstruction, Jim Crow and lynching is going to take some time. That doesnât mean I judge those who disagree with me here as âbadâ. I just canât sit on the sideline without noting that there is a lot more work to be done. That work comes in the form of doing the extra work of finding excellence in places we normally donât look. Itâs a cheap shot to pretend like that equates to hiring lesser candidates or lesser people. That is rarely the problem.
bUt WhItE pRiVilEgEI have been told by HR of a company that I have worked for, that if I'm ever up for a "promotion" they would have to make sure they have there percentages of diversity hires before they could award my hard work with the promotion.
Therefore, it matters not if I'm the more qualified candidate for the job, I may be passed because of my skin color, ethnicity, gender, and whether I'm gay or straight.
Not exactly what I would call equal opportunity.
you coulda made your pt and stopped at 'mellinnia'.Playing devil's advocate a little here, but white people, mostly men, have received preferential treatment for centuries, if not mellinnia. I'm not justifying hiring someone because they're a minority, I'm just saying white males have almost never gotten the bad end of the shaft, period. It really has been a ridiculous run.