Proof of the election fraud

#276
#276
loggervol said:
Do you hate America that bad? Socialism that the democrat party believes in has never worked anywhere. Everything they are doing is not going to help the little guy, it will help the elites. And, just like before, jobs will flee America for cheaper wages and less restrictions.
Click to expand...

You probably believe everything you say because you heard it all your life, but it is all wrong. None of what you are saying in this post is actually true.
 
#277
#277
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
#279
#279
Sin City Vol said:
Can you please become a Gator fan? You’re kinda embarrassing with all the tin foil hat crap
Click to expand...


No tin foil hats here. I posted facts that a lot of people aren't aware of because lamestream media won't provide this information. If you done want to read it or don't agree with me, that's completely fine with me. I post this information so others who are curious about what happened can do some research and form their own opinion on what happened this past election and what we need to change for future elections. Unlike you, I don't expect absolutely everybody else to think exactly like me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, loggervol and BigOrangeGoose
#280
#280
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump supporters have insisted over the last four years on this forum that a coordinated social media effort (Russian-based disinformation and propaganda) in favor of one candidate over another, could not possibly sway enough votes to change the outcome of a presidential election. Your whining is a little hard to sympathize with in light of that.
Click to expand...
Ok? So are they wrong?
 
#283
#283
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump supporters have insisted over the last four years on this forum that a coordinated social media effort (Russian-based disinformation and propaganda) in favor of one candidate over another, could not possibly sway enough votes to change the outcome of a presidential election. Your whining is a little hard to sympathize with in light of that.
Click to expand...


I recall the Russian Collusion Delusion very well. The 2 are not even comparable. Look at what's happening now.

1. Mainstream media refuses to cover anything that doesn't fit their agenda. There was very little coverage of the Biden corruption. Many Americans that voted for Biden did not even know about the Biden's ties to China because the media completely hid this

2. It's quite obvious how Google has suppressed opposing views

3. Facebook and Twitter have been deleting any and all opposing views. They are deleting hard facts and everything having to do with election integrity. Basically anybody who questions the results of this past election are labeled as right wing conspiracy theorists. I could go on and on here
 
  • Like
Reactions: loggervol and BigOrangeGoose
#284
#284
VolinWayne said:
I recall the Russian Collusion Delusion very well. The 2 are not even comparable. Look at what's happening now.

1. Mainstream media refuses to cover anything that doesn't fit their agenda. There was very little coverage of the Biden corruption. Many Americans that voted for Biden did not even know about the Biden's ties to China because the media completely hid this

2. It's quite obvious how Google has suppressed opposing views

3. Facebook and Twitter have been deleting any and all opposing views. They are deleting hard facts and everything having to do with election integrity. Basically anybody who questions the results of this past election are labeled as right wing conspiracy theorists. I could go on and on here
Click to expand...
Facebook and Twitter have been deleting unsubstantiated claims of fraud. During the 2016 presidential campaign they allowed the vast majority of disinformation to stand. They took corrective measures this time around. Good for them.
 
#286
#286
Vol Main said:
But the coverage of Gateway Pundit seems to be different from the local coverage. It is not unusual for a propaganda rag to take a valid report and turn it into something exaggerated and inaccurate.
Click to expand...
True, but it’s also not unusual for the mainstream media to completely ignore certain story lines and shape narratives to a leftist slant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, MemphisVol77 and BigOrangeGoose
#287
#287
VolinWayne said:
But thay doesn't fit his agenda
Click to expand...

My "agenda" is for accurate vote counts of registered voters and for accurate reporting of those counts. If your agenda if for automatic personal attacks against anyone who says something you don't like, regardless of the true facts, then that is your problem, not mine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#288
#288
Roustabout said:
True, but it’s also not unusual for the mainstream media to completely ignore certain story lines and shape narratives to a leftist slant.
Click to expand...

That does happen, but it is far more common for today's so-called conservatives to dismiss factual reports which they do not like as a left wing bias. I get that accusation all the time, myself, and I am not left wing. Left wingers attack me because I often say things they do not like, by calling me a racist right winger, etc. An example is the George Zimmerman case. MSNBC and others went along with the father's lynch mob narrative which turned out to be a false fabrication, which many people passionately believe to this day. Whenever I attempt to correct the false narrative, well, I think you know how that goes.
 
Last edited:
#289
#289
Why are they "crooked thieves"? Because they wanted to protect our democratic system of elections, and build safeguards against public mayhem and chaos.

First you say this.


And, then you admit that they were trying to tip the scales? What is it, are you confused?

Just as Russia tried to tip the scales in favor of Trump. Massive amounts of anti-Hillary memes, wikiLeaks releases of hacked Clinton campaign e-mails and fake news stories sure didn't seem to bother Trump voters in 2016.

I think they also helped to put together the Trump collusion narrative also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol Main
#291
#291
Vol Main said:
You probably believe everything you say because you heard it all your life, but it is all wrong. None of what you are saying in this post is actually true.
Click to expand...

No, I voted for Bill Clinton for his second term. At that time I had no idea of the damage his trade deals would hurt the USA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
#292
#292
Vol Main said:
That does happen, but it is far more common for today's so-called conservatives to dismiss factual reports which they do not like as a left wing bias. I get that accusation all the time, myself, and I am not left wing. Left wingers attack me because I often say things they do not like, by calling me a racist right winger, etc. An example is the George Zimmerman case. MSNBC and others went along with the father's lynch mob narrative which turned out to be a false fabrication, which many people passionately believe to this day. Whenever I attempt to correct the false narrative, well, I think you know how that goes.
Click to expand...
Where is your proof on this? Far more common. I think there is at best, equal amounts on both sides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol and Sandman 423
#294
#294
Vol Main said:
My "agenda" is for accurate vote counts of registered voters and for accurate reporting of those counts. If your agenda if for automatic personal attacks against anyone who says something you don't like, regardless of the true facts, then that is your problem, not mine.
Click to expand...

I agree with everything in this post. Did I miss the part where I attacked you?
 
#295
#295
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeGoose
#296
#296
Roustabout said:
Where is your proof on this? Far more common. I think there is at best, equal amounts on both sides.
Click to expand...

Where is my proof of it? How about the replies to my posts on this forum. Are you going to pretend that you have not seen that proof?
 
#298
#298
Vol Main said:
Whatever your reasons, your vote for Clinton does not make true the things you just said to me.
Click to expand...

Maybe you don’t but you do realize that joe and most of the Dems that were voted for, do. ( hate America). And, if you voted for them, you either don’t care about their views or you feel the same way. The WV Senator may be the only middle of the road dem but he still votes for radical ideas. What does that say about him?

I may be wrong and I’m not going back to check because it’s not worth my time. You have been calling Trump supporters crazy, idiots and whatever else has been said. But refuse to have a real conversation.
 
#299
#299
clarksvol00 said:
Well... some Army guys went AWOL from the motor pool and raided Germany to confiscate some super-secret Spanish servers that Hugo Chavez was using to hack the vote, but those patriots and Sidney Powell haven't released the information from the super secret Spanish servers yet. And if Sydney Powell said it, it has to be true because she would never risk her reputation in the legal community.
Click to expand...
It’s one thing to say that you think states like PA changed their laws in a manner inconsistent with their state constitution and try to follow that path towards fighting the election results (which failed, I know) but Powell was slinging some pretty crazy sh1t out there that was a whole other level of contesting the results. How can you possibly throw something like that out without having rock solid proof? The constitutional argument is based on an interpretation of a document. What she was throwing out is either there or it isn’t. That’s what makes her claim so puzzling. Like BB said, with the lawsuits happening we will get to find out but I’m feeling pretty darn sure Powell isn’t going to like where this ends up and I’m someone that did vote for Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00
#300
#300
Roustabout said:
Where is your proof on this? Far more common. I think there is at best, equal amounts on both sides.
Click to expand...

A lot of evidence appeared in regional newspapers which did not appear in the national media or the trial. But the evidence in the trial disproved the lynch mob narrative. My experience with responding to such questions on this forum is that it is a waste of my time. The short answer is that the proof is in the trial transcript.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top