Withdraw the offer and give osu the chance to withdraw theirs.My thing is....if you want competitors as players, then you need competitors as coaches.
In my mind, if Washington is a competitor then he WANTS to take on a challenge and go up against the best.
If he isn't in the boat by now, after what we are offering, then I don't know he is the competitor we need.
He’s the DC for a coach who is a defensive guy. Top 10 in Total D. 2nd/3rd over a two year period in 3rd down stops. Theres nothing that a reasonable person wouldn’t love about him. He’s doing it against lesser competition but with much lower ranked guys.
I’ve been noticing something, you sit back and take potshots at other folks posts, basically being an uninformed critic, without ever offering up your “solution“. While I may not agree or like a post, at least I do try and give another option, rather than a potshot then leave.I am sure the rest of the SEC would love it if we took him too. Glad you aren’t a decision maker.
I like Reeves at UAB. JMOFirst off, the past 2 days have returned to the circus reporting of the level we had during the Head coach search 3 years ago. It seems as if all the leaked info is coming out of OH. I'll have to agree with AD DW that we are better off doing our business in a fairly clandestine manner, rather than have the local Knoxville yokels throwing out any and everything they can link to a "linked nugget" of some sort. I seriously doubt Washington leaves OSU. Which leads to my next thought.
3 guys that I see as DC's that have been successful at lower-tier programs:
Gillespie - Tulsa
Reeves - UAB
Watts - Fresno St.
The thing that stands out to me is these guys have done well in leagues that are more offensive focused. And they have done well at schools that haven't been top of their league's programs in the past. That probably says they are playing with equal or less talent, and coaching them up to be successful. As bad as our defense looked last year, there is no doubt that our players would benefit from a fresh start on basic techniques.
Where these guys would probably be lacking is on recruiting at the Power 5 level. It would probably take a couple of years for them to prove themselves to really make headway on the recruiting front. To that, you'd hope some of the position coaches could step up in that role. But what kind of assistants would work for an up-and-comer?
I know these guys don't fit the big name, homerun hire that people were hoping for. But realistically, we just need to instill some basic skills back onto the defensive side of the ball at this time. There were just too many times that our guys weren't lined up properly, or even seemed that they knew what their assignment was. In 3 years, I never really knew what our outside LB/Rush end players were doing? They never seemed to cover backs in the flat, maintain outside leverage on outside runs, or generate much pressure on the passer.
I'll hope that whenever we get an announcement of our coaches, we'll have some stability and can begin the rebuilding process.
I’ve been noticing something, you sit back and take potshots at other folks posts, basically being an uninformed critic, without ever offering up your “solution“. While I may not agree or like a post, at least I do try and give another option, rather than a potshot then leave.
My opinion is not erroneous, it’s based on fact. He is a good recruiter, but as a DC, he is about Chavis level, he will get you beat with his bend but don’t break defense. And Fulmer hired him, knowing good and well they were going to fire Pruitt. If he didn’t know that, well, he is a bigger idiot than I thought. I have zero doubt, that he thought his job was safe, and he was going to bring in Marrone to be HC with Steele as DC. I may be wrong, but, as far as Steele and DC, see Chavis, John.I have no real solution just like anyone else. I would just promote Steele. I get your erroneous opinion about him. But he is well respected, good recruiter and developer and has a ton of SEC experience. But it seems we may have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for a no name DC. I mean UABs DC??? Some fans will bring up anything to justify a hire.
Spot On - Everyone needing a DC should look at Reeves, consistently over achives with his players. Being at UAB he is looked over because people just won't check on him.David Reeves enters his fourth season as defensive coordinator and his fifth season overall at UAB.
A two-time Broyles Award nominee, Reeves’ unit has been one of the most disruptive defenses in the country over the past two years. In 2018, the Blazers finished ninth nationally in total defense and in 2019 moved up one spot to finish eighth.
Over the past two seasons, UAB has been among the nation’s best in getting to the quarterback, compiling 92 total sacks and 217 tackles for loss. Additionally, UAB has been able to get off the field when it counted the most, finished No. 2 nationally in third down defense in 2018 and No. 3 in 2019.
Oh and he wants to be hereJust hire Jancek and be done with it. He got a bad rap bc of the Florida game. He was a good dc, kept things simple and aggressive. He got fired bc he basically told Butch what a dumbass he was/is. He has previously worked with Willie Martinez even as co-dc with him. They forced a decent amount of INTs which is what Heupels O would need.
First off, the past 2 days have returned to the circus reporting of the level we had during the Head coach search 3 years ago. It seems as if all the leaked info is coming out of OH. I'll have to agree with AD DW that we are better off doing our business in a fairly clandestine manner, rather than have the local Knoxville yokels throwing out any and everything they can link to a "linked nugget" of some sort. I seriously doubt Washington leaves OSU. Which leads to my next thought.
3 guys that I see as DC's that have been successful at lower-tier programs:
Gillespie - Tulsa
Reeves - UAB
Watts - Fresno St.
The thing that stands out to me is these guys have done well in leagues that are more offensive focused. And they have done well at schools that haven't been top of their league's programs in the past. That probably says they are playing with equal or less talent, and coaching them up to be successful. As bad as our defense looked last year, there is no doubt that our players would benefit from a fresh start on basic techniques.
Where these guys would probably be lacking is on recruiting at the Power 5 level. It would probably take a couple of years for them to prove themselves to really make headway on the recruiting front. To that, you'd hope some of the position coaches could step up in that role. But what kind of assistants would work for an up-and-comer?
I know these guys don't fit the big name, homerun hire that people were hoping for. But realistically, we just need to instill some basic skills back onto the defensive side of the ball at this time. There were just too many times that our guys weren't lined up properly, or even seemed that they knew what their assignment was. In 3 years, I never really knew what our outside LB/Rush end players were doing? They never seemed to cover backs in the flat, maintain outside leverage on outside runs, or generate much pressure on the passer.
I'll hope that whenever we get an announcement of our coaches, we'll have some stability and can begin the rebuilding process.
