Is the pain of change worse than the pain of staying the same? That's what UT football has to decide if the investigation doesn't produce evidence that makes firing Pruitt a must.
Those who believe in Pruitt and believe he can be a good head coach, good for you. I haven't seen an HC get off the mat in year 4 after constant player, staff turnover, and at least 1 bad loss each of his first three seasons and lead his program forward in the modern college football landscape. If the reports are true, and Pruitt is difficult to work with, then they'll be more support people leave over time. If Pruitt isn't the long term hire, then how can you possibly justify bringing him back next year even if you can find reasons to justify the outcome of the 2020 season?
All the traditional power schools have had lulls in their programs from time to time. In most cases, those lulls lasted between 10-15 years before the school returned to a place of stability and winning. If the school didn't get back to winning after that period of time, historically speaking, they don't return to that level. Tennessee is on the threshold of that timeline. I find myself agreeing with Josh Pate, that this next hire is of great significance and importance for the future trajectory of the program.
I believe the pain of staying the same in this case is worse than the pain of change. Pruitt needs to go. A new head coach needs to be hired. The fact that the early signing class brought in 80% of this year's class means you can take a week or two (if it's even needed) and hire your next coach. There are no similarities to when Kiffin left except it happened in January. The panic then was not having much of a class at all. Make the move, let's have hope reborn for this program.
Rant over.