Recruiting Forum Football Talk III

Status
Not open for further replies.
He's a good CEO type, he acts like an adult and has solid relationships through the college and pro landscape. UT could do a lot worse than Marrone
"We could do a lot Worse"..that is some seriously motivating bullsđź’© man...really makes you wanna run through a wall..
 
It's just how it works. You do an in-house investigation, then bring in outside counsel to validate, clear up inconsistencies and see if there's anything else out there. That way, outside counsel can defend allegations with confidence and credibility. And if a client is questioning whether they can, or should, terminate for cause, outside counsel digs deeper and makes a recommendation.

You hearing anything about which direction they might go if Pruitt is out?
 
I think the administration is at the point where they don't care what the fans think. Fulmer has total control.

This exactly. He doesn't give two ***** about the fanbase or their thoughts. Which I why I think he's like JP and will not be here long term at least in the AD role
 
Does he have good recruiting connections? I don't doubt he has a decent Rolodex of NFL names.

UT could (and likely will) do worse than Marrone, but I also think we could do better.
UT could maybe do better and I'm not endorsing Marrone but he is better than say Chadwell or some other names mentioned
 
Freeze/Kiffin/Chadwell is what we want and would inject excitement and get us rolling ...

Marrone WITH a great experienced staff is what we can hope to get right now... That is absolutely the only way that scenario works and makes anyone happy... Marrone comes in without a top OC/DC/supporting staff like Garner/Tee, and it's total garbage... I just can't see UT doing that, especially with Steele already on the way...
 
I think the administration is at the point where they don't care what the fans think. Fulmer has total control.

I agree that admin is blocking out the noise. But you know Fulmer isn't driving this.

Unless you mean, Fulmer wanting to bring in Steele, in which case, yes, he's probably all over that.
 
Preface: I know that part of what I’m about to say is 100% false.

Sometimes (Always) I imagine @LA Vol as the person right in the thick of things (Like he’s Boyd or one of the Lawyers) who has all the facts in front of him and knows the end game, but he obviously can’t reveal it bc things have to play out.

And he feels sorry for all of us to the point he shares things in such a way as to lead us to the appropriate conclusions without saying it flat out. Unfortunately, we (VN) can’t see the forest for the trees.
If anyone is truly paying attention, he is saying a lot of the same things, just with different verbiage. It’s like an insurance agent selling life insurance. That terminology scares some people but if he says “mortgage protection” the person buys it no questions asked. It’s the SAME THING!
LA, I salute you for your patience.
 
I actually didn't say that. I said Marrone probably has as good of a resume for this job as Chadwell or Napier.

Marrone has an ugly NFL record (I know his backers instantly write that off) and was OK at Syracuse, by their standards (he had 2 good years out of 4 and won 40% of their Big East games overall). Chadwell has been good at basically every college job he's coached (except for a one-year stint at Delta State), but he's never coached above the G5 level. Napier, in limited time as a G5 coach, has been successful.

I don't see huge differences between the qualities of those resumes, for this particular job. If you want to talk about resume quality on an absolute basis, not relative to any particular position, then yes, Marrone's is the best purely because he's been in the NFL.

It's the same thing. The "probably" qualifier is just crazy to me. Chadwell and Napier have resumes akin to a Butch Jones. It's a crap shoot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top