BeecherVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 39,169
- Likes
- 14,459
It’s not, would you consider hiring a guy with that pedigree though? Sometimes you have to think outside the box. DetermineWell we are definetly no longer talking about Fisher.
Its limited. we need to look more like 15-16 Butch which is similar in principle to Ohio St, then we do what UK just fired. We would 100% be back in the same place in 3 years if Chadwell is the hireCoastal actually throws quite a bit. They threw for 320 vs LibertyView attachment 337862View attachment 337862
The basic premise is the same, QB based run game, limited passing game.
I was talking about Pete Carroll being hired at USC. They were in innovative offense. Their offense is still being used today. Because you can’t look past records and preconceived notions if you were AD you destroyed a dynasty.Pruitt was supposed to be a defensive mastermind. Defense doesn’t win championships anymore, even Saban has adapted. No experience recruiting, no experience with college kids, no experience at the college level, hasn’t coached in 4/5 years. Definitely not a sure thing hire.
Marrone would be a solid pro style offense with a strong O Line, Our current offense is called we have no QBWhat do you call our current offense? Coastal Carolina averaged more passing yards in fewer attempts per game than we did. They also averaged more rushing yards per game. I can't believe people turn their noses up at Chadwell while championing Marrone and Fisher.
I do agree with that last part. If he got a good oc he would probably do okay here.I was talking about Pete Carroll being hired at USC. They were in innovative offense. Their offense is still being used today. Because you can’t look past records and preconceived notions if you were AD you destroyed a dynasty.
Not saying Fisher will have that type of effect here but he will attract kids because of his NFL pedigree. He’s seen what NFL players look like and knows how to get you there. We could do way worse than him.