I really wish someone "in the know" would point the finger at who is most responsible for this mess so I'd know where to direct my ire.
No one seems to want to weigh in on where the continued dysfunction is at UT since we cleaned house 3 years ago. I've asked several times.
1. UT Admin. - Boyd/Plowman?
2. UT AD - Fulmer? AD staff?
3. UT BOT?
4. Boosters? - specifically where is the conflict between the boosters?
It has to be #4. You don't need any inside info or don't need to be in the know. We don't know specifics and never will, but the boosters are the only common denominator. "The boosters" has largely been the same group of people for years, and they pull strings that affect things down the chain. Boosters sit in this really unique position where technically they aren't the ultimate decision-makers, but they undoubtedly influence and put pressure on the people who are.
If you wanted to direct ire at the administration, I'd ask "which administration?" If you want to direct it at the athletic director, I'd ask "which athletic director?" If you wanted to direct it at the BoT, I'd ask "which Board?" There has been tremendous turnover at each of those positions over the last 10+ years. For example Mike Hamilton was a terrible AD. However, continuing to blame Mike Hamilton, or even Dave Hart, for Tennessee being bad
today seems kind of silly.
The UT booster dynamic I think is similar to a large, really opinionated family that is trying to make a decision about something. Usually, someone in that large family has the most influence and will eventually be able to pull the group to a decision. That does eventually happen at Tennessee, but our group of boosters is very factional, petty, thinks their idea is the right one, is unwilling to compromise, and doesn't want someone else to get credit for the idea if it is successful. Insert whichever allegory you want - too many chiefs and not enough Indians, too many cooks in the kitchen, whatever. Once a decision is made, there are a number of people who feel like they "lost" since it wasn't their idea that was adopted, and so they never get on board or perhaps even intentionally try and wreck the plan. Our booster community would be well-served to have some more folks who write checks purely for the tax write-off, or because they love the university, and decide that they are going to just go with the flow and get on board with whatever the group decides. I think we have very few boosters like that.
At the same time, a figure has failed to emerge within UT admin, the AD, or on the BoT to help rein in these boosters and get them on the same page. The adjectives I used above to describe our boosters can be applied to the boosters at most schools probably, but other schools have figures that help get these people on the same page. Tennessee does not.