Recruiting Forum Football Talk III

Status
Not open for further replies.
#58,780
#58,780
jackcrevol said:
that wouldn't be recommended. he's fine as ad.
Click to expand...
Imo he needs to go... he was supposed to be more like an interim ad. If its true thats he's meddling with the team. (Which i can absolutely see) he's the reason we aren't seeing progress. Imo the only way Pruitt should stay is if fulmer goes. Give him a chance without having fulmer basically trying to sabotage him and his program.
 
#58,784
#58,784
mr.checkerboards said:
They put in their 3rd string QB in a 3 point game. Didn't kick a FG when they had a chance to tie, and then jumped offsides on 4th and inches. Then last play of the game instead of lateraling it around they threw a quick slant and the guy just got down without trying anything.
Click to expand...
The plan was always to put him in the game, Pederson said as much all week. You gonna be this upset when teams rest players week 17 when they have playoff position locked up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Batman1948, VolByLaw and Dudley Smith
#58,785
#58,785
mr.checkerboards said:
I can promise you it took about 2 snaps to know Sudfield did not give them a chance to win.
Click to expand...
He gave them an excellent chance to win the 6th pick in the draft..... I would stand up there and go Nate has been here all year..... last game of the year..... we felt he deserved a chance to show what he can do..... jalen hurts is our QBs going forward if they fell that he is.
 
#58,788
#58,788
BearCat204 said:
The plan was always to put him in the game, Pederson said as much all week. You gonna be this upset when teams rest players week 17 when they have playoff position locked up?
Click to expand...
Pederson sold that on purpose. You play him if its a blowout. In a close game you try to win. Its a bit different when you have a playoff game vs altering the draft order and you play the scrubs all game vs put him in to make sure you don't win
 
#58,792
#58,792
mr.checkerboards said:
Pederson sold that on purpose. You play him if its a blowout. In a close game you try to win. Its a bit different when you have a playoff game vs altering the draft order and you play the scrubs all game vs put him in to make sure you don't win
Click to expand...
My steelers basically gave the game to the browns to rest guys for the playoffs.... what’s the difference in that and letting other guys play to help the team in the future.
 
#58,793
#58,793
volbeast33 said:
My steelers basically gave the game to the browns to rest guys for the playoffs.... what’s the difference in that and letting other guys play to help the team in the future.
Click to expand...
Altering the draft vs making sure stars don't get hurt before games that matter are completely different
 
#58,795
#58,795
mr.checkerboards said:
Pederson sold that on purpose. You play him if its a blowout. In a close game you try to win. Its a bit different when you have a playoff game vs altering the draft order and you play the scrubs all game vs put him in to make sure you don't win
Click to expand...
Unfortunately you nor anyone else gets to decide who is played at QB. He played who he wanted and who he played will be the backup to Hurts next year. Also stop acting like Hurts was lighting it up this game. No way to say they the Eagles would have won this game with Hurts in there.
 
#58,796
#58,796
mr.checkerboards said:
Altering the draft vs making sure stars don't get hurt before games that matter are completely different
Click to expand...
The rules are set up to benefit the eagles to lose that game and hurt their team if they win it.....if Tennessee losing to Vandy brought them justin fields while winning brought you jake Fromm when we don’t have a chance to go to a bowl game anyways.... I’m sure most fans would take the loss and improving the team towards a championship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StoVol
#58,798
#58,798
BearCat204 said:
Unfortunately you nor anyone else gets to decide who is played at QB. He played who he wanted and who he played will be the backup to Hurts next year. Also stop acting like Hurts was lighting it up this game. No way to say they the Eagles would have won this game with Hurts in there.
Click to expand...
He played who he knew wouldn't win. Purposely altering results should be a punishable offense.The NBA had a problem and fixed, the NFL needs to as well
 
#58,800
#58,800
volbeast33 said:
The rules are set up to benefit the eagles to lose that game and hurt their team if they win it.....if Tennessee losing to Vandy brought them justin fields while winning brought you jake Fromm when we don’t have a chance to go to a bowl game anyways.... I’m sure most fans would take the loss and improving the team towards a championship.
Click to expand...
Did you hear half our fans this year, no they wouldn't. A loss to Vandy was the best way to get the Gump out and most still wanted to win.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top