2020 Presidential Race

[RockyTop85]

Ah, more of that "party of facts" stuff I see.

FYI, out of 59 presidential elections, 45 had larger margins of victory AND it appears Biden's win over Trump is the exact margin as Trump's over Clinton. Guess he won in a landslide in 2016?

After Obama expanded it who did it after W expanded it.

Yeah, that will be awesome.

Ah, it’s shift change for the “I am not a trumpkin but can’t help but respond to from unflattering statements about Trump,” employees.



Obama was a bad president. I voted against him twice. Trump was worse. That’s why I voted against him 6 times.

 

[37L1]

Maybe we should just scrutinize the one that made voting effortless with a high probability of fraud.

But, but, but. . . CNNPolitics refutes this.

Facts First: Election experts have told CNN time and time again that mail-in ballots are a safe form of voting and not subject to widespread fraud.
-- Holmes Lybrand

 

[luthervol]

There is a crap load more evidence in 2020 (yes sworn affidavits are evidence) than the 2016 election Russia fiction that was investigated for years afterward.

There is nothing that will come even remotely close to changing the landslide numbers. The affidavits are laughable.

 

[volinbham]

He can't to be honest. Still need to pick up both seats in Georgia to have a slim majority.

as hill says - he can't take one from a state with an R governor. 23 states have D governors from which he could choose. Bernie and Warren though are off limits (thank God).

Even the 50/50 split will be dicey for all those D Senators up in 2022 - doubt they'll want to be on board with a completely non-partisan move by the Senate.

 

[37L1]

Ah, it’s shift change for the “I am not a trumpkin but can’t help but respond to from unflattering statements about Trump,” employees.



Obama was a bad president. I voted against him twice. Trump was worse. That’s why I voted against him 6 times.

Only 6? Slacker.

 

[C-south]

There is nothing that will come even remotely close to changing the landslide numbers. The affidavits are laughable.

Right. Biden is apparently way more popular than Barry ever thought of being......but so was Trump. Landslide numbers and all.

 

[Delmar]

Whether true or not you all gotta stop acting as if foxnews is a right wing news channel. Since Rupert died it has went much further left and outside of the nightly talk show host and a few others like Greg and Watters it's pretty much CNNlite.

Most staunch conservatives went to Newsmax and went in droves.

Good. I don’t get Newsmax in my cable package. It can stay in the nut section with OAN.

 

[RockyTop85]

Only 6? Slacker.

Only 6 were in my name. That was before the Democratic Party sent me that printing equipment and a list of registered voters.

 

[luthervol]

Over the last four years, Donald Trump has frequently referred to this 2016 electoral college margin of victory as being a "landslide". So, if we are applying Trump's own logic, and also being consistent? Yes. Trump won in 2016 by a landslide... and he just lost in 2020 by a landslide.

And then you have the voice of the American people which Trump lost in a landslide in 2016 and a tsunami in 2020.

 

[AM64]

Well Fox News is calling Rudy a liar now so there’s that.

By definition lawyers lie. They argue for one side to support a client, they do not seek fact detrimental to the client; therefore they neither speak nor attempt to find the whole truth. Lying by omission is still lying.

 

[carlos86]

Well certainly not ones with Republican Governors.

The only Senator he would consider appointing to any position would be Susan Collins.

 

[volinbham]

Ah, it’s shift change for the “I am not a trumpkin but can’t help but respond to from unflattering statements about Trump,” employees.



Obama was a bad president. I voted against him twice. Trump was worse. That’s why I voted against him 6 times.

Do you ever refer to unflattering comments about Democrats? If you do does that make you the D equivalent of a Trumpkin - never mind, your endorsement of Sanders for Treasury Sec confirms it.

 

[37L1]

Only 6 were in my name. That was before the Democratic Party sent me that printing equipment and a list of registered voters.

What did you need registered voters for?

Come on, Man!

 

[carlos86]

 

[BowlBrother85]

There is a crap load more evidence in 2020 (yes sworn affidavits are evidence) than the 2016 election Russia fiction that was investigated for years afterward.

Sworn affidavits can be used as evidence, but they don't necessarily prove anything, and that is what this comes down to - proof. The burden of proof lies with the people who are alleging misconduct. There hasn't been any proof of fraud presented... and we are now 16 days out from the election.

 

[luthervol]

Right. Biden is apparently way more popular than Barry ever thought of being......but so was Trump. Landslide numbers and all.

Obama was far more popular than Biden. It's just that Trump is infinitely more hated than McCain or Romney.

 

[TN Ribs]

Ah, more of that "party of facts" stuff I see.

FYI, out of 59 presidential elections, 45 had larger margins of victory AND it appears Biden's win over Trump is the exact margin as Trump's over Clinton. Guess he won in a landslide in 2016?

Here's a fact for you: Trump lost, it's time for him to put his big boy pants on and concede so the adults can start running the Country again.

 

[zeppelin128]

Only 6 were in my name. That was before the Democratic Party sent me that printing equipment and a list of registered voters.

 

[Velo Vol]

 

[McDad]

There is nothing that will come even remotely close to changing the landslide numbers. The affidavits are laughable.

Are you seeing evidence of fraud?

If yes, is the fraud inconsequential to outcome?

If yes, is the fraud a concern for your trust in future elections?

 

[tvolsfan]

Certify and get on with it.

 

[carlos86]

Pennsylvania Court REJECTS Trump's appeal of the Bucks County Board of Elections decision to count certain mail-in ballots.

Trump and his allies are now 1-31 in post-election litigation.

 

[volinbham]

Here's a fact for you: Trump lost, it's time for him to put his big boy pants on and concede so the adults can start running the Country again.

Here's a fact for you: I've never claimed he didn't lose and do think he should concede.

 

[zeppelin128]

as hill says - he can't take one from a state with an R governor. 23 states have D governors from which he could choose. Bernie and Warren though are off limits (thank God).

Even the 50/50 split will be dicey for all those D Senators up in 2022 - doubt they'll want to be on board with a completely non-partisan move by the Senate.

I don't think he will pull anyone from the Senate. Jmo

 

[37L1]

Are you seeing evidence of fraud?

If yes, is the fraud inconsequential to outcome?

If yes, is the fraud a concern for your trust in future elections?

I'll answer for him.

No to #1, so #2 and #3 is N/A.

There you go, luther.