So, luther, a number of poll watchers have made claims about things done incorrectly. Can you tell us how those claims are addressed, and how they are dismissed? If you've ever worked in a bureaucracy, you'd know that claims of impropriety simply vanish - a lot of time the "claimant doesn't know the big picture; therefore, he/she couldn't possibly know what's wrong or important." That's why every now and then there's a whistle blower, a big scandal, and people wondering how this could have gone on for so long.
Perhaps the reason there's no evidence of wrongdoing is because poll watchers and election workers have no formal path forcing accusations to be heard? In court they have no standing. Seems like the whole concept of poll watchers is something like off gas in a hurricane. Imagine football or other sport where the officials could make calls and a coach could overrule - how many times do you suppose both coaches would bless the officials call?