Sin City Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2014
- Messages
- 9,170
- Likes
- 10,658
Link?Not buying it I’ve seen it mentioned in other places also.
Here is a reply. It hasn’t been verified and no where is a “2 count error” mentioned. It remains an open issue.
Are you intentionally proving my point?Here is a reply. It hasn’t been verified and no where is a “2 count error” mentioned. It remains an open issue.
DeKalb CEO responds to GOP claims of vote counting error
The Republican monitor wrote in an affidavit that after raising the issue, the count for that batch of recounted ballots was off by two votes, not the 9,626 that he had initially said.Are you intentionally ignoring your point was wrong? It wasn’t a two vote error as you claim. I can give you two other links that say the error was found and corrected but do not discount the amounts in the claims
Recounts won't help in any of them imo...audit is the only way to know for sure...otherwise you are just recounting possibly fraudulent votesHe has an outside shot at the two closest. Which I think is GA and Arizona. But it's not going to be enough.
And honestly I dont think it's going to be close on any of them.
Georgia official debunks tweet about mismanagement of ballots in DeKalbThe Republican monitor wrote in an affidavit that after raising the issue, the count for that batch of recounted ballots was off by two votes, not the 9,626 that he had initially said.
In that case trumps legal teams need to get their act together. As it is they have one sorta successful case going with far more easy defeats.Recounts won't help in any of them imo...audit is the only way to know for sure...otherwise you are just recounting possibly fraudulent votes
Not really his call. They choose what cases they want to hear. Again, you are asking for an activist court. They very well may hear his cases. Doesn’t mean they have a shot in hell. There is zero chance they will call for what you asked. That would be disastrous for this country. That last statement has nothing to do with R’s or D’s. Courts should not be deciding how states want to cast votes.Trump has already stated this fight will go to the supreme court.
Recounts won't help in any of them imo...audit is the only way to know for sure...otherwise you are just recounting possibly fraudulent votes
The only shot at unity was a clear cut winner with there being no questions or funny business ala Nevada taking a day off. We dont have that. We wont get it.If it makes it to the SC, and I am not saying it will, but if it does they could force a full audit for the sanctity of the Union.
It could fall under betterment of the country so whomever is elected is deemed the true winner and this country can move forward with some form of unity.