2020 Presidential Race

Well, I am, but that faith will soon hit the liberals right in the face.
GUEST_fd895826-8f2b-4179-b46e-1fc9a2d7dd5d
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Are you intentionally ignoring your point was wrong? It wasn’t a two vote error as you claim. I can give you two other links that say the error was found and corrected but do not discount the amounts in the claims
The Republican monitor wrote in an affidavit that after raising the issue, the count for that batch of recounted ballots was off by two votes, not the 9,626 that he had initially said.
 
ND,
It's time to give it up and lay low. Do not willingly sacrifice the last shreds of credibility you have remaining as so many other Trumpers seem intent on doing.
 
He has an outside shot at the two closest. Which I think is GA and Arizona. But it's not going to be enough.

And honestly I dont think it's going to be close on any of them.
Recounts won't help in any of them imo...audit is the only way to know for sure...otherwise you are just recounting possibly fraudulent votes
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne and NEO
The Republican monitor wrote in an affidavit that after raising the issue, the count for that batch of recounted ballots was off by two votes, not the 9,626 that he had initially said.
They made a mistake but fixed it before sending in the results.

This isn't rocket science.
 
The Republican monitor wrote in an affidavit that after raising the issue, the count for that batch of recounted ballots was off by two votes, not the 9,626 that he had initially said.
Georgia official debunks tweet about mismanagement of ballots in DeKalb

BATTLEGROUND BLOG: Twitter Flags Georgia GOP Chairman For Election Misinformation

Here is his Twitter feed he’s not backing down. This isn’t over. I have no idea if it will change the outcome but your states voting is a clown show.

David Shafer (@DavidShafer) on Twitter
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Recounts won't help in any of them imo...audit is the only way to know for sure...otherwise you are just recounting possibly fraudulent votes
In that case trumps legal teams need to get their act together. As it is they have one sorta successful case going with far more easy defeats.

I think right now they are lashing out in a "if you defend everything, you defend nothing" kind of way.
 
Trump has already stated this fight will go to the supreme court.
Not really his call. They choose what cases they want to hear. Again, you are asking for an activist court. They very well may hear his cases. Doesn’t mean they have a shot in hell. There is zero chance they will call for what you asked. That would be disastrous for this country. That last statement has nothing to do with R’s or D’s. Courts should not be deciding how states want to cast votes.
 
Recounts won't help in any of them imo...audit is the only way to know for sure...otherwise you are just recounting possibly fraudulent votes


If it makes it to the SC, and I am not saying it will, but if it does they could force a full audit for the sanctity of the Union.

It could fall under betterment of the country so whomever is elected is deemed the true winner and this country can move forward with some form of unity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
If it makes it to the SC, and I am not saying it will, but if it does they could force a full audit for the sanctity of the Union.

It could fall under betterment of the country so whomever is elected is deemed the true winner and this country can move forward with some form of unity.
The only shot at unity was a clear cut winner with there being no questions or funny business ala Nevada taking a day off. We dont have that. We wont get it.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top