"Should haves" and "should nots".The sum of my argument is the blatant conflict of interest displayed by Donald Trump. He should not have been party to any investigation of Joe Biden last year. Period.
It's basis is in the U.S. Constitution. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal protection under the law. Trump was effectively trying to tip the scales against him. An investigation into criminal activity by an American citizen, should be left under the purview of the U.S. Department of Justice; not the President of the United States. If it involves alleged crimes committed overseas? Then the foreign government with jurisdiction should be the one to lead that investigation: once again, not the President of the United States.
I can give you a link to the U.S. Constitution which says that American citizens are entitled to equal protection under the law."Should haves" and "should nots".
Link the law that states a US President can't ask for anti-corruption measures if it may adversely affect a politician who may want to run for President in the future.
LOL. It was a year away from an election year and Biden was the clear front runner for the Democratic Party nomination - which he did eventually secure. You are not this naive. Nobody is. Trump's motive behind wanting Joe Biden investigated, was to damage him politically and in doing so, enhance his own chances of being re-elected.
"Should haves" and "should nots".
Link the law that states a US President can't ask for anti-corruption measures if it may adversely affect a politician who may want to run for President in the future.
He's got messages, data that he's turning over to the FBI. Says Joe is FOS when he says he wasn't involved. Meeting with Senate committee looking into this.
At least 3 phones with messaging apps conversations.
No way to ignore the story now
Wasn't aware Donald Trump was usurping the presidency of Ukraine in the process and "leading" the investigation.It's basis is in the U.S. Constitution. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal protection under the law. Trump was effectively trying to tip the scales against him. An investigation into criminal activity by an American citizen, should be left under the purview of the U.S. Department of Justice; not the President of the United States. If it involves alleged crimes committed overseas? Then the foreign government with jurisdiction should be the one to lead that investigation: once again, not the President of the United States.
Trump withheld aid to the Ukraine for the purpose of prompting the investigation. I would call that "taking a lead".Wasn't aware Donald Trump was usurping the presidency of Ukraine in the process and "leading" the investigation.
Your head is so far up your own ass you don't even know what you're saying anymore.
Trump was asking the Ukraine to do the investigating, and it has zero to do with US COnstitution, or the BIiens' rights as US citizens.It's basis is in the U.S. Constitution. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal protection under the law. Trump was effectively trying to tip the scales against him. An investigation into criminal activity by an American citizen, should be left under the purview of the U.S. Department of Justice; not the President of the United States. If it involves alleged crimes committed overseas? Then the foreign government with jurisdiction should be the one to lead that investigation: once again, not the President of the United States.
Somebody give me the video