The Hunter Biden Thread

The sum of my argument is the blatant conflict of interest displayed by Donald Trump. He should not have been party to any investigation of Joe Biden last year. Period.
"Should haves" and "should nots".

Link the law that states a US President can't ask for anti-corruption measures if it may adversely affect a politician who may want to run for President in the future.
 
Oh I’m laughing at your implication of why the aid was delivered it’s that simple. You’re guessing. However it’s a stated fact that your boy got a prosecutor fired in order to receive aid. In fact he admitted it on video! 😀
No, you are misrepresenting that video. We have been over that before.
 
It's basis is in the U.S. Constitution. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal protection under the law. Trump was effectively trying to tip the scales against him. An investigation into criminal activity by an American citizen, should be left under the purview of the U.S. Department of Justice; not the President of the United States. If it involves alleged crimes committed overseas? Then the foreign government with jurisdiction should be the one to lead that investigation: once again, not the President of the United States.

Fusion GPS and Steele say "hey" (via Team Clinton and the DNC of course)
 
"Should haves" and "should nots".

Link the law that states a US President can't ask for anti-corruption measures if it may adversely affect a politician who may want to run for President in the future.
I can give you a link to the U.S. Constitution which says that American citizens are entitled to equal protection under the law.
 
He's got messages, data that he's turning over to the FBI. Says Joe is FOS when he says he wasn't involved. Meeting with Senate committee looking into this.

At least 3 phones with messaging apps conversations.

No way to ignore the story now
Should be interesting
 
LOL. It was a year away from an election year and Biden was the clear front runner for the Democratic Party nomination - which he did eventually secure. You are not this naive. Nobody is. Trump's motive behind wanting Joe Biden investigated, was to damage him politically and in doing so, enhance his own chances of being re-elected.
"Should haves" and "should nots".

Link the law that states a US President can't ask for anti-corruption measures if it may adversely affect a politician who may want to run for President in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
He's got messages, data that he's turning over to the FBI. Says Joe is FOS when he says he wasn't involved. Meeting with Senate committee looking into this.

At least 3 phones with messaging apps conversations.

No way to ignore the story now

Even after today, the MSM will continue to cover it up for Crooked Joe Biden.
 
It's basis is in the U.S. Constitution. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal protection under the law. Trump was effectively trying to tip the scales against him. An investigation into criminal activity by an American citizen, should be left under the purview of the U.S. Department of Justice; not the President of the United States. If it involves alleged crimes committed overseas? Then the foreign government with jurisdiction should be the one to lead that investigation: once again, not the President of the United States.
Wasn't aware Donald Trump was usurping the presidency of Ukraine in the process and "leading" the investigation.

Your head is so far up your own ass you don't even know what you're saying anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
Wasn't aware Donald Trump was usurping the presidency of Ukraine in the process and "leading" the investigation.

Your head is so far up your own ass you don't even know what you're saying anymore.
Trump withheld aid to the Ukraine for the purpose of prompting the investigation. I would call that "taking a lead".

If you deny that was Trump's motive behind withholding the aid, then you are the one with his head up his ass.
 
It's basis is in the U.S. Constitution. As an American citizen, Joe Biden is entitled to equal protection under the law. Trump was effectively trying to tip the scales against him. An investigation into criminal activity by an American citizen, should be left under the purview of the U.S. Department of Justice; not the President of the United States. If it involves alleged crimes committed overseas? Then the foreign government with jurisdiction should be the one to lead that investigation: once again, not the President of the United States.
Trump was asking the Ukraine to do the investigating, and it has zero to do with US COnstitution, or the BIiens' rights as US citizens.
 
Trump withheld aid to the Ukraine for the purpose of prompting the investigation. I would call that "taking a lead".

If you deny that was Trump's motive behind withholding the aid, then you are the one with his head up his ass.
Well that’s definitely your implication now isn’t it! 😂
 

VN Store



Back
Top