volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 70,373
- Likes
- 64,358
And that’s the crux of it. I can’t see how anybody would try to defend Hunter it’s clear he’s a worthless POS. But did daddy use his influence in a quid pro quo to place Hunter in jobs and did Hunter and his dad sell his dad’s influence.Even without the laptop there is zero doubt that Hunter got rich off the family name.
Can't believe anyone would buy Joe's claim that he never discussed any of Hunter's business dealing with him.
Did any flow to Joe? Uncertain but some indications it may have.
Wonder how many debate questions Joe gets tomorrow night about this. I’m guessing zero.
If Trump gets re-elected Wray does not survive till the end of the year.Trump should call Wray in his office and ask him three questions.
Did they have this laptop during the impeachment hearings.
When did you learn of it’s existence
Why didn’t you bring it’s existence forth sooner? Why did we have to learn about its existence in the news.
And I don’t see how Wray could survive keeping his job if he answers those questions truthfully.
Joe got his 10% share through Hunter.
You voting for Jorgensen?
Nah, I'm using my vote to cancel out @Grand Vol's vote.
Trump will bring it up and Biden will point out the underlying thesis of it has been disproven and everyone will move on. Trump however will probably make some claim about some big announcement or event or release of information (which was his ploy in 2016 to try to get some attention). His base will get amped but it will fall flat. Again.
which underlying thesis; there are many.
There is no doubt Hunter profited off the Biden name.
There is no doubt the Joe actually did have conversations with Hunter about his business.
There is doubt whether or not: Joe participated in the proceeds and if Joe took any actions resulting from Hunter's relationships with foreign countries.
It's silly for Joe to deny the first two; it's silly for anyone to deny them