The Hunter Biden Thread

Even without the laptop there is zero doubt that Hunter got rich off the family name.

Can't believe anyone would buy Joe's claim that he never discussed any of Hunter's business dealing with him.





Did any flow to Joe? Uncertain but some indications it may have.
And that’s the crux of it. I can’t see how anybody would try to defend Hunter it’s clear he’s a worthless POS. But did daddy use his influence in a quid pro quo to place Hunter in jobs and did Hunter and his dad sell his dad’s influence.

Hunter is the mechanism. Corruption is the question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Wonder how many debate questions Joe gets tomorrow night about this. I’m guessing zero.




Trump will bring it up and Biden will point out the underlying thesis of it has been disproven and everyone will move on. Trump however will probably make some claim about some big announcement or event or release of information (which was his ploy in 2016 to try to get some attention). His base will get amped but it will fall flat. Again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hunerwadel
Trump should call Wray in his office and ask him three questions.

Did they have this laptop during the impeachment hearings.

When did you learn of it’s existence

Why didn’t you bring it’s existence forth sooner? Why did we have to learn about its existence in the news.

And I don’t see how Wray could survive keeping his job if he answers those questions truthfully.
If Trump gets re-elected Wray does not survive till the end of the year.
 
When you look at a worthless unskilled POS like Hunter drawing millions to "work" in a foreign corporation, or a Caroline Kennedy sitting on the Boeing board of directors, then you have to draw a connection to governmental influence. Perhaps there is and perhaps not cash flow between the kids and connected families, but there is certainly influence peddling or the kids would be doing something far different. I'd never accuse us of having the best government money can buy, but we certainly have a bought government - bought by foreign and domestic entities, and that definitely seems counter to sworn oaths of office.
 
Trump will bring it up and Biden will point out the underlying thesis of it has been disproven and everyone will move on. Trump however will probably make some claim about some big announcement or event or release of information (which was his ploy in 2016 to try to get some attention). His base will get amped but it will fall flat. Again.

which underlying thesis; there are many.

There is no doubt Hunter profited off the Biden name.

There is no doubt the Joe actually did have conversations with Hunter about his business.

There is doubt whether or not: Joe participated in the proceeds and if Joe took any actions resulting from Hunter's relationships with foreign countries.

It's silly for Joe to deny the first two; it's silly for anyone to deny them
 
You coming out here and voting for Kendra Horn to offset me?

No way I'm flying over there, way too many 'nados for my taste. I will however mail a duffel full of pre marked ballots to her district from my dark web business.
 
which underlying thesis; there are many.

There is no doubt Hunter profited off the Biden name.

There is no doubt the Joe actually did have conversations with Hunter about his business.

There is doubt whether or not: Joe participated in the proceeds and if Joe took any actions resulting from Hunter's relationships with foreign countries.

It's silly for Joe to deny the first two; it's silly for anyone to deny them

Look at it this way. Even if Hunter never passed money to Joe, the corrupt connection meant Joe didn't have to send Hunter a huge allowance. Money not spent is probably more worthwhile than having to earn more to support a bad choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1
Advertisement

Back
Top