The Hunter Biden Thread

#927
#927
Orangeburst said:
Yes sir. Not sure how I missed it all these year, but not even sure 5 years ago it made as much sense as it does today. The antitrust thing is conflicting, but shows titans putting their hand on scale and makes u wonder how they currently support progressives. Fact is the whole thing is a Dem scam for votes, just like this foreign collusion and corporate support.

We can add this to your list of Dem sheep stupidity.
Click to expand...

Politics comes down to power and money - and usually power is all about getting more money. It's still all about do as I say not do as I do. The party that claims not to support big business has it's hands as deep in those pockets as anybody else. Just look at who attends the speeches the Clintons have given for years. Generally there's more of both money and power to be gained in times of change; for example, who gained financially over the table from globalism - it wasn't the many who loved cheep Chinese goods. You can bet the politicians who brokered the arrangement did very well on untraceable payments. Joe probably did better than Hunter, but it's not something we'll likely ever know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, TN-POSSUM, midnight orange and 4 others
#928
#928
hUTch2002 said:
Funny how that works. Sadly, you’re correct but we need to go through the charade so it at least appears people in DC care. This story will get complete cover though because both sides do things like this.
Click to expand...

Except for the party control thing, we might elect outsiders and then dump them before they become insiders - like one and done. Don't bet against the GOP asking the dems how you rig primaries to make sure future Trumps don't happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, marcusluvsvols, Orangeburst and 2 others
#929
#929
volfanhill said:
Disagree. He’s down 30%. He’s down that bc 30% of the country would cheer Trump on while he was plowing their wife.
Click to expand...

You are not DR viewer or you could not make such an assessment. EVERY article is negative now. I have heard it from family, friends and many on here.
As to say 30% would cheer on adultery with their spouse, that is a pathetic statement.

Edit: Lets just agree to disagree.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, 1972 Grad, davethevol and 2 others
#934
#934
Orangeburst said:
I watched the History channel with "The Men who Built America" and learned about the titans collaborating against WJB, the first progressive Prez candidate. Wonder what the Gates, Bezos, Zuckers, and Buffets of the world are thinking. Then get TDR in as VP as he was antitrust and to watch that backfire, Very interesting. Produced in 2012, Cuban even made a comment about his rivalry with Trump.

This election seems to parallel that era.
Click to expand...
You can observe whatever you want about the proggies adopting many of the populist goals from the omaha platform. However, WJB was a Dem, and trust-busting TR was a Rep. That is an amazing series, esp the one on westinghouse, morgan, tesla, and edison, but i mustve missed the ep you are talking about.

Edit: to ref your other post, i think theres a good reason you didnt know that all these years. Ha
 
#935
#935
GordonC said:
You can observe whatever you want about the proggies adopting many of the populist goals from the omaha platform. However, WJB was a Dem, and trust-busting TR was a Rep. That is an amazing series, esp the one on westinghouse, morgan, tesla, and edison, but i mustve missed the ep you are talking about.

Edit: to ref your other post, i think theres a good reason you didnt know that all these years. Ha
Click to expand...

That was the episode in reference. What did I say that contradicts your statement?
 
#936
#936
Orangeburst said:
I watched the History channel with "The Men who Built America" and learned about the titans collaborating against WJB, the first progressive Prez candidate. Wonder what the Gates, Bezos, Zuckers, and Buffets of the world are thinking. Then get TDR in as VP as he was antitrust and to watch that backfire, Very interesting. Produced in 2012, Cuban even made a comment about his rivalry with Trump.

This election seems to parallel that era.
Click to expand...

I started to watch that but I kept going.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#942
#942
AM64 said:
Politics comes down to power and money - and usually power is all about getting more money. It's still all about do as I say not do as I do. The party that claims not to support big business has it's hands as deep in those pockets as anybody else. Just look at who attends the speeches the Clintons have given for years. Generally there's more of both money and power to be gained in times of change; for example, who gained financially over the table from globalism - it wasn't the many who loved cheep Chinese goods. You can bet the politicians who brokered the arrangement did very well on untraceable payments. Joe probably did better than Hunter, but it's not something we'll likely ever know.
Click to expand...

I know a guy that is in logistics. It wasn't his background in college. Someone referred him because overseas defense contractors had a need for people willing to handle supply chain work in volatile environments. We know there is billions tied up in these bridges to nowhere government contracts aka our tax dollars. All of a sudden Trump starts bringing soldiers home and getting us out of the business of nation building with no end games.

He's back over here doing domestic logistics for another company but those big companies are pissed that the swamp has started to dry. This is where Joe/Kamala come in with their globalist policies and stepping in the middle of every foreign issue. Making us even more hated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, ajvol01, AM64 and 1 other person
#944
#944
Orangeburst said:
Yes sir. Not sure how I missed it all these year, but not even sure 5 years ago it made as much sense as it does today. The antitrust thing is conflicting, but shows titans putting their hand on scale and makes u wonder how they currently support progressives. Fact is the whole thing is a Dem scam for votes, just like this foreign collusion and corporate support.

We can add this to your list of Dem sheep stupidity.
Click to expand...
I figured out Teddy Roosevelt initials quickly, but wasn't sure about Bryan. Didn't he run for Pres about as many times as Biden?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and AM64
#945
#945
1972 Grad said:
I figured out Teddy Roosevelt initials quickly, but wasn't sure about Bryan. Didn't he run for Pres about as many times as Biden?
Click to expand...

Not sure and dont want any more red marks for my lack of memory. That whole era between Reconstruction and WW1 just was not that interesting to me during my learned years.. Industrialization, western expansion, Spanish American War and labor issues were about all I remember.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and AM64
#946
#946
Orangeburst said:
I am sure I have as I have a PS degree. Just do not get to memorize it for class like a history teacher.
Click to expand...
No man, I'm not meaning it that way at all. What I was trying to say, and apparently did a poor job of saying it, is that I am not surprised that was something you had never heard before.
I doubt WJB ever heard it either.
I would love to know how those creators of that HC doc are determining someone to be a "progressive."
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and AM64
#947
#947
Orangeburst said:
Not sure and dont want any more red marks for my lack of memory. That whole era between Reconstruction and WW1 just was not that interesting to me during my learned years.. Industrialization, western expansion, Spanish American War and labor issues were about all I remember.
Click to expand...
At least you HAD some learned years LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, AM64 and Orangeburst
#948
#948
1972 Grad said:
I figured out Teddy Roosevelt initials quickly, but wasn't sure about Bryan. Didn't he run for Pres about as many times as Biden?
Click to expand...
no clue as to how many times he was "in the hunt" for the nomination
ran 3x, two consecutive with second time as a defeated candidate
Stevenson did the same against Ike
would be curious to look and see who else
Edit: Dewey lost to FDR and Truman in 44 and 48
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and AM64
#949
#949
GordonC said:
no clue as to how many times he was "in the hunt" for the nomination
ran 3x, two consecutive with second time as a defeated candidate
Stevenson did the same against Ike
would be curious to look and see who else
Edit: Dewey lost to FDR and Truman in 44 and 48
Click to expand...
Check out Harold Stassen sometime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and GordonC
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top