carlos86
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2011
- Messages
- 8,776
- Likes
- 6,986
There is nothing that Trump ever says which requires deep analysis. His accusations always reflect a simple-mindedness. They are invariably transparent in their motive, self-serving and easily refuted.That isn't a rationalization of Trump, it's just an observation of you guys.
You play this weird game of bouncing back and forth between taking stuff Trump says and saying he's a thoughtless buffoon, and taking stuff Trump says and deeply analyzing it ad nauseam for meaning and malicious intent.
It is hilarious to watch.
Citing threats, Mayor Lori Lightfoot defends ban on protesters on her block: ‘I have a right to make sure that my home is secure’lol............You sited a bunch of sh*** sources. That proves my point much more than it does yours. Fear Porn Propaganda.
PBS
Chicago 5 - WTH?
MSN - WTH?
The U S Sun - WTH?
RT - WTH?
Daily Caller - WTH?
Fox News - WTH?
There was one legitimate source (PBS) and it was a minor story about beefed up security around her house.
You said Chicago 5 - WTH?No it's not propaganda. It's a local story.
You guys acting like it is some national story that everyone should be familiar with and gravely concerned over is where propaganda rears it's ugly head.
No it's not propaganda. It's a local story.
You guys acting like it is some national story that everyone should be familiar with and gravely concerned over is where propaganda rears it's ugly head.
No, I was just giving examples that shattered your talking points with things he did. You tried for a gotcha moment against the governors that "ordered" something. Trying to be cute is where you went wrong. What the governors did rose up to authoritarian but trump's "order" didn't?You were asking about where he could have done more. I pointed it out. You have since deflected to arguing that he is wrong instead of what more could he do.
That isn't a rationalization of Trump, it's just an observation of you guys.
You play this weird game of bouncing back and forth between taking stuff Trump says and saying he's a thoughtless buffoon, and taking stuff Trump says and deeply analyzing it ad nauseam for meaning and malicious intent.
It is hilarious to watch.
I could be wrong, but what I get he is saying is that the story is irrelevant except on a local level.Are you questioning the content or what?
And yet another deflection...Yes how can you not know / understand the way a group that followed Hitler was compatible to the Democratic Party following the slavery philosophy? How does a history major see a Cuban refugee giving first hand knowledge escaping socialism / communism , a part of your party’s active political agenda - Bernie Sanders / AOC/ ANTIFA / defunding the police / doing away with prisons / Free health for everyone / free education for everyone ) and come away in your words as spreading fear ? Im sure I can come up with more but that a full plate I just handed you so ... I digress .
Was it an actual order? Written down somewhere and sent to GM? I havent seen that said, so it's not on the level of the governors. If he did actually send them an order then yes that would be at least as bad as what the governors did.No, I was just giving examples that shattered your talking points with things he did. You tried for a gotcha moment against the governors that "ordered" something. Trying to be cute is where you went wrong. What the governors did rose up to authoritarian but trump's "order" didn't?
And yet another deflection...
Reframing the narrative is what you guys do. Continue on with your mindless rambling.It’s not a deflection it’s all about buzz words , power phrases , controlling language , control the flow of information, threats of fines , jail , loosing your job and not being able to provide for your family . Are you sure you are a history major , I mean it works the same way all down through history . You are choosing to highlight what makes you uncomfortable ( RNC/ fear mongering ) but ignore what pleases you ( DNC/ perfectly acceptable to you) . I still find what you call “ scary “ very interesting.