Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#68,526
#68,526
Sea Ray said:
I doubt that he broke their TOS . In fact their TOS actually allows what Trump Jr posted even if you believe the drug is dangerous:



Twitter Terms of Service

So tell me, what term of service did he violate?
Click to expand...

Only speculating as to Twitter response being related to the insistence that wearing a mask isn't helpful, which runs counter to public health recommendations.

So, if Twitter believes the risk, due to the high-profile status of Don Jr., worth taking action, per their TOS, it is their prerogative.
 
#68,527
#68,527
And another:
Yale epidemiologist says hydroxychloroquine is 'the key to defeating COVID-19'
Yale epidemiologist says hydroxychloroquine is 'the key to defeating COVID-19'
An Ivy League epidemiology professor is claiming that hydroxychloroquine — the drug that has been at the center of a politicized medical debate for the last several months — is "the key to defeating COVID-19," and that medical officials should be widely prescribing it to save the lives of thousands of coronavirus patients.
Harvey Risch, a professor of epidemiology at Yale as well as the director of that school's Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Laboratory, argues in a Newsweek op-ed this week that "the data fully support" the wide use of hydroxychloroquine as an effective treatment of COVID-19.
...
Click to expand...
 
#68,538
#68,538
Stew Cook said:
It's been widely banned in the EU as a COVID treatmemt. Global conspiracy?
Click to expand...
For the same reason here. People want something cheap and affordable that actually works and this does according to many Doctors on the front lines. Governments and Big Pharma want to profit, I thought liberals were against that. So you are saying the Yale Prof is wrong?
 
#68,544
#68,544
Stew Cook said:
It's been widely banned in the EU as a COVID treatmemt. Global conspiracy?
Click to expand...

Yes.

Coronavirus and hydroxychloroquine: What do we know?

Trials around the world were temporarily derailed when a study published in The Lancet claimed the drug increased fatalities and heart problems in some patients.

The results prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) and others to halt trials over safety concerns.

However, the Lancet subsequently retracted the study when it was found to have serious shortcomings and the WHO resumed its trials.

Other studies have looked at using the drugs as a preventative measure against Covid-19.

The Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU) is conducting mass clinical trials and has enrolled 40,000 frontline workers in Europe, Africa, Asia and South America, giving participants either chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine or a placebo.

Professor Sir Nick White, who's leading the trial, said: "Most experts agree there is a much better chance of benefit in prevention than treatment."

This study is able to resume after being placed on hold following the fallout from The Lancet's retracted study.
Click to expand...

Top European hospitals deny providing data for retracted COVID-19 research

Spain will not stop use of HCQ to treat COVID-19 patients, unlike other European nations
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123 and BigOrangeD
#68,547
#68,547
BigOrangeD said:
For the same reason here. People want something cheap and affordable that actually works and this does according to many Doctors on the front lines. Governments and Big Pharma want to profit, I thought liberals were against that. So you are saying the Yale Prof is wrong?
Click to expand...

Im saying he has an opinion and claims peer-reviewed supporting documentation. Yet, official clinical trials were stopped after observing the opposite of therapeutic benefits.

So, both his opinions.and "proofs", to this point, are as good as the opinions that say the opposite, but not as good as official trials.

My doctor, my choice seems to be an option here, if you believe one over another.
 
#68,549
#68,549
Stew Cook said:
Im saying he has an opinion and claims peer-reviewed supporting documentation. Yet, official clinical trials were stopped after observing the opposite of therapeutic benefits.

So, both his opinions.and "proofs", to this point, are as good as the opinions that say the opposite.

My doctor, my choice seems to be an option here, if you believe one over another.
Click to expand...
I'm good with that. Many doctors are being lied to by the CDC and FDA IMO. Lawsuits are pending.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top