Marxist Black Lives Matter

  • Like
Reactions: 508mikey
https://www.stltoday.com/opinion/ed...cle_fc44a15a-98c5-560a-a4da-ce988ae947f0.html

The greatest danger the McCloskeys faced during the brief encounter was from each other as they wildly aimed their firearms and exercised minimal trigger-finger discipline. At one point, pistol-wielding Patricia McCloskey walked right in front of her husband’s assault-rifle muzzle. At various other points, he aimed his rifle directly at her upper torso and head. At no point in video footage did protesters appear to step on the McCloskeys’ property, keeping a distance of 25 to 30 feet from the mansion.


lmao
I made jokes about him having the gun pointed at her..... right at her upper torso
 


Them twins speaking that truth again . It’s odd don’t you think , that we never and I mean never see a liberal comment on the Hodge twins videos ? Now I wonder why that is ? I’m especially interested why we don’t see a @k-town_king comment about these two black men dropping truth bombs . 🤔
 
Last edited:
It is. Prosecutors that charge without merit should have ethics hearings. Prosecutors works for the people to bring justice. Acting despite the laws is ot justice, therefore, not acting in the best interest of the people.

Yep...and this one specific Prosecutor has some shady ties, as well. Financial ties to multiple George Soros owned political “sponsors “...

She’s also under criminal investigation for her indictment of former Missouri governor Eric Greitens, in which her hand picked investigator has been indicted on 7 counts of perjury and awaiting trial. The case against Greitens was dropped for lack of evidence..
 


From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

"In a statement, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner said, 'It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St. Louis.'"

If they hadn't pointed their weapons at people, they wouldn't have been arrested.
 
From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

"In a statement, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner said, 'It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St. Louis.'"

If they hadn't pointed their weapons at people, they wouldn't have been arrested.
She is wrong. They were posing a threat when they broke down the gate.
 
From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

"In a statement, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner said, 'It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St. Louis.'"

If they hadn't pointed their weapons at people, they wouldn't have been arrested.

The "protesters" were trespassing. DA is going to lose bigly on this political stunt.
 
The "protesters" were trespassing. DA is going to lose bigly on this political stunt.
Yep. I ask this: Why is it OK for Government Officials\Leaders to point guns at anyone that breaks through their gate\barrier(Governor Mansion, White House, Embassy, Military Compound, etc) and not a private citizen? All are secured premises. A threat is a threat.
 
From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

"In a statement, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner said, 'It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St. Louis.'"

If they hadn't pointed their weapons at people, they wouldn't have been arrested.

There is no small amount of leeway when facing a mob that literally nobody is arguing wasn't trespassing while standing on one's own property.

If the people that want to bring the charges follow through (which IMO is much more politically motivated than any pursuit of justice) the accusations will have to bear up under actual legal scrutiny.

Note I'm not excluding the possibility of other legal considerations I'm not aware of at this point which may bolster the prosecutions case.
 

He cannot be this dumb...
Exploit your workers as much as you can, and hoard all the profits for yourself. Fire enployees that speak of unionization and worker safety.
The second your marketing department posts a black square on instagram you officially become communist!
Oh, Amazon changed the corporate logo to pride colors! I guess that means they are leftist?
Sadly this is what many conservatives unironically believe. People are now conflating cultural identity politics with economics as being one in the same.Guess there's no choice but to heavily tax Amazon as punishment for its Marxism ;)
 

He cannot be this dumb...
Exploit your workers as much as you can, and hoard all the profits for yourself. Fire enployees that speak of unionization and worker safety.
The second your marketing department posts a black square on instagram you officially become communist!
Oh, Amazon changed the corporate logo to pride colors! I guess that means they are leftist?
Sadly this is what many conservatives unironically believe. People are now conflating cultural identity politics with economics as being one in the same.Guess there's no choice but to heavily tax Amazon as punishment for its Marxism ;)


Can't tell if serious.
This is ANTIFA and determined to do damage. NOT a peaceful protest.
Please tell me you are joking with your comments.
 
Can't tell if serious.
This is ANTIFA and determined to do damage. NOT a peaceful protest.
Please tell me you are joking with your comments.

I was referring to our acting Director of homeland security characterizing Amazon as "LEFT" per his tweet. Someone thinking that ANY mega-corporation could be in any meaningful way, "leftist" is moronic---he is in trump's cabinet for a reason I suppose.
Did you not get this? Nuance/Irony really is dead. So, for all the folks who can't stop thinking in binary terms: being "socially left" doesn't mean they're economically left.--- i.e., Amazon changing the corporate logo to pride colors or Amazon's "performative" gesture amid the ongoing Black Lives Matter protests. This does not denote leftism ---this is about market share. Again, VN always seems to conflating cultural identity politics--which the vast majority of corporations are embracing-- with economics as being one in the same. To be clear Amazon is not economically "right" either ---they are basically integrated with the government and enjoy the benefit of tax gifts and winner take all hypercapitalism. Bezos is the king of the Neolibs.
Anyone remember when people got upset about how some looters took $100k worth of stuff from Walmart a couple of weeks ago? I bet you that Bezos made that amount in 3 minutes. ....oh....Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
What is you definition of a looter?

Lawmaker blasts Amazon’s ‘performative’ support of Black Lives Matter movement
 
I was referring to our acting Director of homeland security characterizing Amazon as "LEFT" per his tweet. Someone thinking that ANY mega-corporation could be in any meaningful way, "leftist" is moronic---he is in trump's cabinet for a reason I suppose.
Did you not get this? Nuance/Irony really is dead. So, for all the folks who can't stop thinking in binary terms: being "socially left" doesn't mean they're economically left.--- i.e., Amazon changing the corporate logo to pride colors or Amazon's "performative" gesture amid the ongoing Black Lives Matter protests. This does not denote leftism ---this is about market share. Again, VN always seems to conflating cultural identity politics--which the vast majority of corporations are embracing-- with economics as being one in the same. To be clear Amazon is not economically "right" either ---they are basically integrated with the government and enjoy the benefit of tax gifts and winner take all hypercapitalism. Bezos is the king of the Neolibs.
Anyone remember when people got upset about how some looters took $100k worth of stuff from Walmart a couple of weeks ago? I bet you that Bezos made that amount in 3 minutes. ....oh....Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
What is you definition of a looter?

Lawmaker blasts Amazon’s ‘performative’ support of Black Lives Matter movement

A CRIMINAL
 
Advertisement

Back
Top