RikidyBones
Formerly utvols88
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2009
- Messages
- 39,691
- Likes
- 99,897
So instead of having school let's have school but without the education
So instead of having school let's have school but without the education
There are a lot of caveats involved with schools reopening. They are saying to do so safely, meaning masks, social distancing, cleaning, among other things. Last time I went to my sons school, he can't social distance in his classroom. So that is a no go. You may want to read past the headlines.Science isn’t exactly being celebrated on the left when it comes to whether or not schools should reopen.
I agree if you don't count murdering that groundhogQuite possibly the dumbest thing he has done. Did they have covid-19 parties in the school buildings or something? You know the places that are equipped to keep the children safe , feed children, school nurses ,playgrounds to get some space and have a janitorial staff to disinfect to their hearts content.
CDC says schools should openView attachment 293624
SCREW YOU, EINSTEIN!
Take your fake news scientific theories and shove em up your GOYA bean hole.
View attachment 293625
Finally someone taking the virus seriously....Wanna be GI Joe's vs. Cartel, make it a ppv match all proceeds go to St Jude
Colombian cartels killing anyone who doesn't obey coronavirus lockdown orders: report
You mean the part where he started with the assumption that it was the presidents job to do everything for the nation before the states themselves did anything?You clearly didn’t read it.
And you may want to read up on the numerous different approaches school systems were looking at to overcome that problem. Rotating days, temporary structures etc..There are a lot of caveats involved with schools reopening. They are saying to do so safely, meaning masks, social distancing, cleaning, among other things. Last time I went to my sons school, he can't social distance in his classroom. So that is a no go. You may want to read past the headlines.
Not to mention, the country and world weren’t near the numbers they are now so the percentage that died was a much larger percentage of the population both domestically and worldwide.The 1918 Flu killed 500 million people worldwide and almost 700K in the U.S. We aren't even going to sniff those numbers without some serious manipulation of the data.
This is a new virus that makes some people sick some of the time and is one of any number of things that kill old and susceptible people. If it were killing all kind of people in droves then you have a point. But the simple truth is it isn't. It isn't even taxing the hospital system, not even in NY. The MSM and fear peddlers should be ashamed of themselves here.