Ghislaine Maxwell

Raz, Since you seem to have been "paying so much attention" and don't mind insulting me or accusing me of being a troll I am interested in your opinion on couple of things.
1.) I'm curious how much you know, or what your opinion is of Trump's ties to Mossad, the Zionist, and the Khazarian Mafia.
2.) His real connection to Epstein, his own child sexual abuse, and his connection to Roy Cohn.
For the record I am neither Democrat or Republican because I believe they are all evil and corrupt. So don't try to drag me into the party debate.
3.) Who do you think controls Trump?
Well first off, I'm sorry you took offense or assumed I was attacking you. Go back and look at what I posted. I wasn't sure if you were being serious or being sarcastic. I then proceeded to follow up with a question afterwards about recent Middle East history just in case you were seriously asking.

Headscratcher here... I'm not sure if you are trolling or if you are serious.

Have you been paying attention to what has been going on in the ME over the last 40 years?
 
Spying Under International Humanitarian Law
Privacy Under Human Rights Law - Article 17 of the ICCPR
Extraterritorial Obligations Under Human Rights Law -
Violations of Domaine Riservd
Illegal Usurpation of a Government Function
A Violation of Self-Determination

Are those US laws or international/United Nation laws?

So we can impeach or charge a POTUS for allegedly violating international law?
 
Are those US laws or international/United Nation laws?

So we can impeach or charge a POTUS for allegedly violating international law?
I'm speaking about Russia at this point.
At a minimum, Trump encouraged and welcomed the interference.
 
Raz, Since you seem to have been "paying so much attention" and don't mind insulting me or accusing me of being a troll I am interested in your opinion on couple of things.
1.) I'm curious how much you know, or what your opinion is of Trump's ties to Mossad, the Zionist, and the Khazarian Mafia.
2.) His real connection to Epstein, his own child sexual abuse, and his connection to Roy Cohn.
For the record I am neither Democrat or Republican because I believe they are all evil and corrupt. So don't try to drag me into the party debate.
3.) Who do you think controls Trump?

Khazarian Mafia? Interesting... What are you saying?
 
Well, before the lefties come in here. GM seems to be saying that she doesn't "actually remember" ("not off the top of my head") herself in the presence of Trump and Epstein together, but there is obviously a photo of them together somewhere. I'm sure that will need to be pressed a bit more.
She couldn’t tell a bigger lie. Is she claiming diminished capacity?

30318810-8485479-Maxwell_with_Epstein_and_Donald_and_Melania_Trump_in_2000-a-17_1593736371000.jpg
 
Yeah, you said a mouthful.

So let me get this straight. The Russians flooded social media with propaganda. You do know most Trump voters are mostly older voters that don't get their info from social media, but from mainstream sources/FOXNews. Also, whatever campaign Russia had on social media, are you really going to tell me that Russia's social media presence was more influential than Hillary's $1 billion campaign and the free cheerleading from 90% of the major US newspapers, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, etc?
This is the reality that truly boggles my mind.

Russia interference is the narrative.

What about the media interference?

What about big tech interference (e.g. Google search results)?

It’s so ridiculous it’s funny.
 
Are those US laws or international/United Nation laws?

So we can impeach or charge a POTUS for allegedly violating international law?
By the way, there's no proof of (at least) most of those. Especially the claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers and distributed the info. Even Crowdstrike has since backed away from that claim, as many of us predicted from the first.
 
This is the reality that truly boggles my mind.

Russia interference is the narrative.

What about the media interference?

What about big tech interference (e.g. Google search results)?

It’s so ridiculous it’s funny.
Hillary lost because blacks didn't show up and vote for her. Democrats vowed 'never again'. Hence, racial armageddon.
 
By the way, there's no proof of (at least) most of those. Especially the claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers and distributed the info. Even Crowdstrike has since backed away from that claim, as many of us predicted from the first.
Oh, I realize that. I just wanted to assume the worst case scenario.
 
Hillary lost because blacks didn't show up and vote for her. Democrats vowed 'never again'. Hence, racial armageddon.
But she carried hot sauce in her purse! And now, Joe helped them understand that they can't be black if the don't vote for him.


Hmmm... I wonder if that means they get some sort of new privileges if they refuse to vote for him...
 
But she carried hot sauce in her purse! And now, Joe helped them understand that they can't be black if the don't vote for him.


Hmmm... I wonder if that means they get some sort of new privileges if they refuse to vote for him...
Assuming JB does win, it's going to be hard for the Ds to put the genie in the bottle after Nov. They assume that their base will get in line and Rs will respect the rule of law. I'm not so sure that either of those things will happen. If I had the money. I'd leave the country for a year or two.
 
Assuming JB does win, it's going to be hard for the Ds to put the genie in the bottle after Nov. They assume that their base will get in line and Rs will respect the rule of law. I'm not so sure that either of those things will happen. If I had the money. I'd leave the country for a year or two.
The genie will 100% go back in the bottle and Washington will return to normal. You seem to be making the mistake of assuming this has been partisan politics. It hasn't. It's been the swamp creatures trying to protect themselves. If Trump loses and Biden wins, the swamp rats on both sides will go back to business as usual.
 
They flooded social media with misinformation. Granted, the right wing propaganda machine was doing it also, but Russia's efforts definitely had an impact. How much will never be known.


The more tangible connection is Stone as go between to wikileaks. Stone was in direct contact with Assange and Trump at the same time. In fact, Trump was told in advance, and encouraged, attacks on Clinton by them.

Add that to Trump's intransigence on release of financial records, various ties to Russian-influenced banks...

This isn't hard to figure out.
 
The more tangible connection is Stone as go between to wikileaks. Stone was in direct contact with Assange and Trump at the same time. In fact, Trump was told in advance, and encouraged, attacks on Clinton by them.

Add that to Trump's intransigence on release of financial records, various ties to Russian-influenced banks...

This isn't hard to figure out.

When is Mueller filing his charges?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
The genie will 100% go back in the bottle and Washington will return to normal. You seem to be making the mistake of assuming this has been partisan politics. It hasn't. It's been the swamp creatures trying to protect themselves. If Trump loses and Biden wins, the swamp rats on both sides will go back to business as usual.
When President Trump is reelected on November 3rd the Denizens of the Swamp will continue to act like they have for the past four years:rolleyes:
 
Yeah, you said a mouthful.

So let me get this straight. The Russians flooded social media with propaganda. You do know most Trump voters are mostly older voters that don't get their info from social media, but from mainstream sources/FOXNews. Also, whatever campaign Russia had on social media, are you really going to tell me that Russia's social media presence was more influential than Hillary's $1 billion campaign and the free cheerleading from 90% of the major US newspapers, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, etc?
Can we start an investigation into the MSM interference in elections? The Russians don't hold a candle to their corruption.
 
Last edited:
Well first off, I'm sorry you took offense or assumed I was attacking you. Go back and look at what I posted. I wasn't sure if you were being serious or being sarcastic. I then proceeded to follow up with a question afterwards about recent Middle East history just in case you were seriously asking.

No problem, I just felt disrespected. I certainly do not want to debate you, I have nothing to prove.
But allow me to explain.
I will probably get off the politics thread, I get to upset with people attacking each other because of not agreeing with them. It seems we have many agendas dividing us right now, and we should be more aware of that and more sensitive to each other.

And, honestly I'm very sensitive around the 4th of July. For what it stands for, plus the fireworks bring back bad memories and spark more nightmares that I live with off and on throughout my life. You would have to been in the Vietnam war to understand the trauma and after affects. The warrior that the Army and war instilled in me comes out sometime. I guess it has to escape, so when I am accused of being someone that I am not, or my integrity is attacked I will defend it strongly.

I'm not a hero or I never ask for anything special, just only respect. You can call me ugly,, fat, old man, redneck, hillbilly or about anything and I will laugh it off. So, I think we should all be careful of everyone else's feelings, they may have just been someone that fought for your rights, or helped save someone in your family their life. ALL FEELINGS MATTER...

You do not owe me an apology, you did that. Sorry this is so long but thought that I owed you an apology and an explanation.
 
The truth about Trump will come out eventually.

There has already been a lot of what I personally believe to be the truth come out about Trump, especially info before him being elected, but it has been covered up and paid to go away. Some of it I think will be brought out again before election to at least plant doubt in peoples mind about him.
I think he was much more involved with Epstein than we are led to believe, at least before 2005. He was smart enough to distance himself from him then.
 
There has already been a lot of what I personally believe to be the truth come out about Trump, especially info before him being elected, but it has been covered up and paid to go away. Some of it I think will be brought out again before election to at least plant doubt in peoples mind about him.
I think he was much more involved with Epstein than we are led to believe, at least before 2005. He was smart enough to distance himself from him then.


I dont rule it out. Trump os a cheater at every level. He would have no problem breaking laws in that area if he wanted to.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top