BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 46,701
- Likes
- 41,322
Certainly possible, O’Biden doesn’t bother me sure he’s a pandering, senile moron but him alone I don’t see as dangerous. My issue with O’Biden is the pro commie people he is going to surround himself with. A big key to President Trump winning is getting O’Biden out of the bunker and out on the campaign trail so everyone can once again be reminded he isn’t fit for officeBiden is going to win the election.
Biden doesn't inspire me at all. He is as much of a career politician as anyone, which I really don't like. I hate career politicians when talking about Mitch McConnell, and I still hate them when talking about Biden. However, there will definitely be multiple liberal Supreme Court Justices who either from death or retirement, will be replaced in the next 4 years. In order for there to be a balance to the court, they need to be replaced by liberal justices. That only happens if Biden is elected. I'm also just tired of the Trump schtick. A Biden Administration will be quieter and less chaotic. I think the country is ready for that.Barring something massive, you're probably right. It still doesn't make him a good choice. I'm not sure how either winning actually makes anyone "happy". We should all be sad(and outraged) that we cannot get a good candidate from either side.
My biggest point of contention would be the argument about liberal justices. I understand the SCOTUS has been turned into a political body, but that never should have happened. More than anything, we need justices able to see both sides, willing to compromise, and willing to rule on the word of law. Interpret the Constitution, don't try to rewrite it. Stick to the lane you are meant to occupy. The courts were never meant to be political, or used as political weapons. Something I truly wish both sides would remember. Something I wish the justices themselves would remember.Biden doesn't inspire me at all. He is as much of a career politician as anyone, which I really don't like. I hate career politicians when talking about Mitch McConnell, and I still hate them when talking about Biden. However, there will definitely be multiple liberal Supreme Court Justices who either from death or retirement, will be replaced in the next 4 years. In order for there to be a balance to the court, they need to be replaced by liberal justices. That only happens if Biden is elected. I'm also just tired of the Trump schtick. A Biden Administration will be quieter and less chaotic. I think the country is ready for that.
I agree with you 100%, but as you pointed out, it has already been turned into a political body. There is no doubt that Trump perceives it to be a political extension (Trump politicizes everything) and he has even openly expressed disappointment in Roberts and Gorsuch for not strictly walking the conservative line.My biggest point of contention would be the argument about liberal justices. I understand the SCOTUS has been turned into a political body, but that never should have happened. More than anything, we need justices able to see both sides, willing to compromise, and willing to rule on the word of law. Interpret the Constitution, don't try to rewrite it. Stick to the lane you are meant to occupy. The courts were never meant to be political, or used as political weapons. Something I truly wish both sides would remember. Something I wish the justices themselves would remember.
Gave you a like because this is a honest answer and is a valid reason for voting for Biden..I wish SCOTUS wasn't a political entity but it isBiden doesn't inspire me at all. He is as much of a career politician as anyone, which I really don't like. I hate career politicians when talking about Mitch McConnell, and I still hate them when talking about Biden. However, there will definitely be multiple liberal Supreme Court Justices who either from death or retirement, will be replaced in the next 4 years. In order for there to be a balance to the court, they need to be replaced by liberal justices. That only happens if Biden is elected. I'm also just tired of the Trump schtick. A Biden Administration will be quieter and less chaotic. I think the country is ready for that.
Sounds like a candidate for office who wants to pander to his largest voting bloc (white men without college degrees) during an election year... and as for whether or not, "college is for fun"? That completely depends on the goals of each individual student. No such blanket statement is applicable to everyone. Try becoming a physician, attorney or CPA without going to college.I like this..I'm with Elon Musk..college is for fun...I think it's too expensive and alot of degrees could easily be ended with apprenticeships
Trump executive order stresses skill over college degree in hiring
It became a political body long before Trump. But just because it currently IS a political body is not a defense for it to remain a political body. The justices themselves could change that. Maybe Roberts and Gorsuch are trying. Maybe the rest of the justices, on both sides, should join in. It's not a one sided problem, so addressing it as such is incorrect.I agree with you 100%, but as you pointed out, it has already been turned into a political body. There is no doubt that Trump perceives it to be a political extension (Trump politicizes everything) and he has even openly expressed disappointment in Roberts and Gorsuch for not strictly walking the conservative line.
As if Barry didn’t do the sameI agree with you 100%, but as you pointed out, it has already been turned into a political body. There is no doubt that Trump perceives it to be a political extension (Trump politicizes everything) and he has even openly expressed disappointment in Roberts and Gorsuch for not strictly walking the conservative line.
There weren't any polls in 2016 showing Hillary Clinton with a lead in Texas. If Texas is truly in play, Trump is toast.
I didn't say it began with Trump, and I didn't say it was one-sided. But it has become a political body and there is no going back now. Clearly, Trump does view his Supreme Court nominations to be extensions of his administration. Trump's tweet that the Supreme Court may not like him, was very telling. He doesn't consider their rulings to be legal interpretations of the law or of the Constitution. He considers them to be political decisions.It became a political body long before Trump. But just because it currently IS a political body is not a defense for it to remain a political body. The justices themselves could change that. Maybe Roberts and Gorsuch are trying. Maybe the rest of the justices, on both sides, should join in. It's not a one sided problem, so addressing it as such is incorrect.
Nice find! I stand corrected. I guess we will see if history repeats itself. I still prefer when my candidate leads in the polls.Poll: Hillary Clinton Leads Donald Trump in Texas
SEP 6, 2016
Poll: Hillary Clinton Leads Donald Trump in Texas
Also, didn't Trump frequently criticize Obama for signing too many executive orders? This is a very silly EO. The President of the United States has no business advising companies on their hiring criteria, much less signing an order around it. This is executive overreach.I like this..I'm with Elon Musk..college is for fun...I think it's too expensive and alot of degrees could easily be ended with apprenticeships
Trump executive order stresses skill over college degree in hiring
Nice find! I stand corrected. I guess we will see if history repeats itself. I still prefer when my candidate leads in the polls.
I get your 2016 refrain. I will still say that polls will be right more often than they will be wrong. History, beyond simply pointing to 2016, bears that out. Once again, I will always prefer my candidate of choice to have a big lead in the polls, than to be way behind.The Crooked Hillary campaign, including James Carville, and the corrupt news media felt exactly the same way as you do throughout 2016.
If a Pollster were to call me I would tell them I am voting for Sleepy Joe.
Agree on governing by EO..this is for government positions onlyAlso, didn't Trump frequently criticize Obama for signing too many executive orders? Especially if they were improper infringements into the private sector? This is a very silly EO. The President of the United States has no business advising private companies on their hiring criteria, much less signing an order around it. This is executive overreach.